Cited by 15Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareTreatment of Major Depression

Antenatal identification of major depressive disorder: a cohort study

Lyell, Deirdre J., Chambers, Andrea S., Steidtmann, Dana, Tsai, Esther, Caughey, Aaron B., Wong, Amy, Manber, Rachel·2012·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to estimate the frequency of identification of major depressive disorder by providers during prenatal care.Study design A cohort of pregnant women who were participating in a randomized controlled trial and who had received a diagnosis of major depressive disorder was examined. Women were included in the current study if prenatal clinic records were available and legible.Results Clinical depression was noted in 56% of prenatal charts and on 24% of problem lists. Physicians and certified nurse midwives noted depression equally (P = .935); physicians more frequently noted mental health referral (23% vs 0%; P = .01), and midwives more frequently included depression on the problem list (P = .01). Recent medication use, which was stopped before conception or study participation, predicted notation of depression in the chart (P = .001).Conclusion Depression frequently is missed during pregnancy and, when identified, is underacknowledged as a problem. Women who have not recently used antidepressant medication are more likely to be missed. Better screening and acknowledgment are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.030

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyell, D. J., Chambers, A. S., Steidtmann, D., Tsai, E., Caughey, A. B., Wong, A., & Manber, R.
Affiliations
  • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Lyell, Deirdre J.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
207
Issue
6
Pages
506.e1-506.e6
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126972209
Cited by
15
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS09988)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, prenatal care, maternal depression, problem list, mental health referral, antidepressant use, depression screening in pregnancy
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Cohort Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review