Cited by 54Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

Management of women with human papillomavirus persistence: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.

Open access
Elfgren, Kristina, Elfström, K. Miriam, Naucler, Pontus, Arnheim-Dahlström, Lisen, Dillner, Joakim·2017·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Background Introduction of human papillomavirus-based screening is ongoing in many countries, given its higher sensitivity and longer-lasting protection compared with cytology-based screening. However, optimal clinical management of human papillomavirus-positive but cytology-negative women is unclear, and additional studies with clinical follow-up are warranted. Objective The aim of the current study was to investigate the long-term outcomes of the clinical management used in a double-blind, randomized clinical trial of human papillomavirus screening conducted in the context of the routine, organized screening program in Sweden. Study design Among 12,527 women aged 32-38 years enrolled in the trial, we followed up the 195 women who attended the colposcopy screening who were cytologically normal but persistently human papillomavirus positive (at least 12 months later; median, 19 months) in the human papillomavirus testing arm (n = 100) or were randomly selected from the control arm (n = 95). Women in the human papillomavirus testing arm were followed up with repeated human papillomavirus testing, cytologies, and colposcopies if persistently human papillomavirus-positive without cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse. A similar number of random colposcopies and tests were carried out in the control arm. Women were followed up over 13 years for the main outcome measures: cumulative incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse. Results Among women who continued to attend and had continuous human papillomavirus persistence, all (40 of 40, 100% [95% confidence interval, 91-100%]) developed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse. There were no cases among women who cleared their human papillomavirus persistence (0 of 35, 0% (95% confidence interval, 0-10%) (P < .001). Among women who had had human papillomavirus persistence but did not continue with repeated human papillomavirus tests (unknown persistence status), 56% (15 of 27 women) developed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse. Almost all cases occurred within 6 years. The intensive clinical management in the trial appeared to result in diagnoses of earlier cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse but apparently did not prevent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse. Conclusion Women with human papillomavirus persistence will, in general, either become human papillomavirus negative or develop cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse within 6 years, even with intensive clinical follow-up.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.042

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies suggest that a wider range of HPV genotyping may confer additional clinical benefits.

    “previous studies suggest that a wider range of HPV genotyping may confer additional clinical benefits [23, 24]”

    From Comparison of Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 assay with BD Onclarity HPV assay for human papillomavirus genotyping (2022) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Results report different CIN2+ risks for persistent HPV types, and the Discussion suggests prioritizing women with persistent HPV16 (page not available in our copy). This supports a potential clinical use for type-specific information, but the paper does not evaluate whether genotyping a wider range of HPV types confers additional benefits. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999;189:12-9.
  2. Mayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I, et al. Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papa- nicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1579-88.
  3. Bulkmans NW, Rozendaal L, Voorhorst FJ, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ. Long-term protective effect of high-risk human papillomavirus testing in population-based cervical screening. Br J Cancer 2005;92:1800-2.
  4. Elfstrom KM, Smelov V, Johansson AL, et al. Long term duration of protective effect for HPV negative women: follow-up of primary HPV screening randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2014;348:g130.
  5. Katki HA, Kinney WK, Fetterman B, et al. Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice. Lancet Oncol 2011;12: 663-72.
  6. Munoz N, Castellsague X, de Gonzalez AB, Gissmann L. Chapter 1: HPV in the etiology of human cancer. Vaccine 2006;24(Suppl 3): S3/1-10.
  7. Ylitalo N, Josefsson A, Melbye M, et al. A prospective study showing long-term infection with human papillomavirus 16 before the development of cervical carcinoma in situ. Cancer Res 2000;60:6027-32.
  8. Evander M, Edlund K, Gustafsson A, et al. Human papillomavirus infection is transient in young women: a population-based cohort study. J Infect Dis 1995;171:1026-30.
  9. Ho GY, Bierman R, Beardsley L, Chang CJ, Burk RD. Natural history of cervicovaginal papillomavirus infection in young women. N Engl J Med 1998;338:423-8.
  10. Elfgren K, Rylander E, Radberg T, et al. Colposcopic and histopathologic evaluation of women participating in population-based screening for human papillomavirus deoxy- ribonucleic acid persistence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:650-7.
  11. Naucler P, Ryd W, Tornberg S, et al. Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;357: 1589-97.
  12. Jacobs MV, Snijders PJ, Voorhorst FJ, et al. Reliable high risk HPV DNA testing by polymerase chain reaction: an intermethod and intramethod comparison. J Clin Pathol 1999;52:498-503.
  13. Jacobs MV, Snijders PJ, van den Brule AJ, Helmerhorst TJ, Meijer CJ, Walboomers JM. A general primer GP5þ/GP6(þ)-mediated PCR-enzyme immunoassay method for rapid detection of 14 high-risk and 6 low-risk human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical scrapings. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:791-5.
  14. Luyten A, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Luyten K, et al. Early detection of CIN3 and cervical cancer during long-term follow-up using HPV/Pap smear co-testing and risk-adapted follow-up in a locally organised screening programme. Int J Cancer 2014;135:1408-16.
  15. Eklund C, Forslund O, Wallin KL, Dillner J. Global improvement in genotyping of human papillomavirus DNA: the 2011 HPV LabNet In- ternational Proficiency Study. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:449-59.
  16. Koshiol J, Lindsay L, Pimenta JM, Poole C, Jenkins D, Smith JS. Persistent human papillo- mavirus infection and cervical neoplasia: a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2008;168:123-37.
  17. Castle PE, Rodriguez AC, Burk RD, et al. Long-term persistence of prevalently detected human papillomavirus infections in the absence of detectable cervical precancer and cancer. J Infect Dis 2011;203:814-22.
  18. Munoz N, Hernandez-Suarez G, Mendez F, et al. Persistence of HPV infection and risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a cohort of Colombian women. Br J Cancer 2009;100:1184-90.
  19. Rodriguez AC, Schiffman M, Herrero R, et al. Longitudinal study of human papillomavirus persistence and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia ajog.org GYNECOLOGY Original Research MARCH 2017 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 264.e6 grade 2/3: critical role of duration of infection. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:315-24.
  20. Kreimer AR, Schiffman M, Herrero R, et al. Long-term risk of recurrent cervical human papillomavirus infection and precancer and cancer following excisional treatment. Int J Cancer 2012;131:211-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elfgren, K., Elfström, K. M., Naucler, P., Arnheim-Dahlström, L., & Dillner, J.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Dillner, Joakim
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
216
Issue
3
Pages
264.e1-264.e7
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2547028142
Cited by
54
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
HPV-based screening, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, HPV testing, colposcopy, HPV clearance, long-term follow-up, cervical cancer prevention, organized screening programs, cervical cancer incidence
MeSH terms
Adult, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Colposcopy, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Sweden, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Papillomavirus Infections, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review