Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (part 3)

Macones, George A., Caughey, Aaron B., Wood, Stephen L., Wrench, Ian J., Huang, Jeffrey, Norman, Mikael, Pettersson, Karin, Fawcett, William J., Shalabi, Medhat M., Metcalfe, Amy, Gramlich, Leah, Nelson, Gregg, Wilson, R. Douglas·2019·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

This Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Guideline for postoperative care in Cesarean Delivery (CD) will provide best practice, evidenced-based, recommendations for post-operative care with, primarily a maternal focus. The pathway process for scheduled and unscheduled CD, for this ERAS CD guideline, will consider time from completion of cesarean until maternal hospital discharge. The literature search (1966-2017) used Embase and PubMed to search medical subject headings including "Cesarean Section", "Cesarean Delivery", "Cesarean Section Delivery" and all post-operative ERAS® items. Study selection allowed titles and abstracts to be screened by individual reviewers to identify potentially relevant articles. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled studies, nonrandomized controlled studies, reviews, and case series were considered for each individual topic. Quality assessment and data analyses evaluated the quality of evidence and recommendations were evaluated according to the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) as used and described in previous ERAS® Guidelines. The ERAS Cesarean Delivery guideline / pathway has created a pathway for postoperative care). Specifics include sham feeding, nausea and vomiting prevention, post-operative analgesia, nutritional care, glucose control, thromboembolism prophylaxis, early mobilization, urinary drainage, and discharge counseling.A number of elements of postoperative care of women undergoing cesarean delivery are recommended based on the evidence. As the ERAS Cesarean Delivery pathway (elements / processes) are studied, implemented, audited, evaluated, and optimized by the maternity care teams, there will be an opportunity for focused and optimized areas of care and recommendations to be further enhanced.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.012

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 128 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Pereira Gomes Morais, 2016, Chewing gum for enhancing early recovery of bowel function after caesarean section, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10, CD011562
  2. Harmon, 2000, Acupressure and prevention of nausea and vomiting during and after spinal anaesthesia for cesarean section, Br J Anaesth, 84, 463, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013471 · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013471
  3. Carvalho, 2000, Prophylactic ephedrine during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Dose-response study of bolus and continuous infusion administration, Braz J Anesthesiol (Int), 11, 32
  4. Ure, 1999, Glycopyrrolate reduces nausea during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section without affecting neonatal outcome, Br J Anaesth, 82, 277, 10.1093/bja/82.2.277 · doi:10.1093/bja/82.2.277
  5. Stein, 1997, Acupressure versus iv metoclopramide to prevent nausea and vomiting during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section, Anesth Analg, 84, 342, 10.1213/00000539-199702000-00018 · doi:10.1213/00000539-199702000-00018
  6. Lussos, 1992, The antiemetic efficacy and safety of prophylactic metoclopramide for elective cesarean delivery during spinal anesthesia, Reg Anesth, 17, 126, 10.1136/rapm-00115550-199217030-00002 · doi:10.1136/rapm-00115550-199217030-00002
  7. Chestnut, 1987, Administration of metoclopramide for prevention of nausea and vomiting during epidural anesthesia for elective cesarean section, Anesthesiology, 66, 563, 10.1097/00000542-198704000-00022 · doi:10.1097/00000542-198704000-00022
  8. Santos, 1984, Prophylactic use of droperidol for control of nausea and vomiting during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section, Anesth Analg, 63, 85, 10.1213/00000539-198401000-00018 · doi:10.1213/00000539-198401000-00018
  9. Emmett, 2006, Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for caesarean section, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4, CD002251
  10. 2012, Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management, Anesthesiology, 16, 248
  11. Sultan, 2016, The effect of intrathecal morphine dose on outcomes after elective cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis, Anesth Analg, 123, 154, 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001255 · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000001255
  12. Mkontwana, 2015, Oral analgesia for relieving post-caesarean pain, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3, CD010450
  13. Masood, 2014, A randomized comparative trial of early initiation of oral maternal feeding versus conventional oral feeding after cesarean delivery, Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 126, 115, 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.02.023 · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.02.023
  14. Jalilian, 2014, Randomized clinical trial comparing postoperative outcomes of early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section, J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 40, 1649, 10.1111/jog.12246 · doi:10.1111/jog.12246
  15. Hsu, 2013, Early oral intake and gastrointestinal function after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Obstet Gynecol, 121, 1327, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318293698c · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e318293698c
  16. Modi, 2016, Controversies in the peripartum management of diabetes, Anaesthesia, 71, 750, 10.1111/anae.13487 · DOI
  17. Ghoreishi, 2003, Indwelling urinary catheters in cesarean delivery, Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 83, 267, 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00144-9 · doi:10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00144-9
  18. Barnes, 1998, Is it better to avoid urethral catheterization at hysterectomy and cesarean section?, Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol, 8, 15
  19. Senanayake, 2005, Elective cesarean section without urethral catheterization, J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 31, 32, 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2005.00237.x · doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2005.00237.x
  20. Vukmir, 1993, Compliance with emergency department referral: the effect of computerized discharge instructions, Ann Emerg Med, 2, 819, 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)80798-X · doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80798-x

Cited by

See all 448

Metadata

Authors
Macones, G. A., Caughey, A. B., Wood, S. L., Wrench, I. J., Huang, J., Norman, M., Pettersson, K., Fawcett, W. J., Shalabi, M. M., Metcalfe, A., Gramlich, L., Nelson, G., & Wilson, R. D.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
221
Issue
3
Pages
247.e1-247.e9
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886021238
Cited by
448
References
128
FWCI
45.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (part 3). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.012
The paper
Macones, G. A., Caughey, A. B., Wood, S. L., Wrench, I. J., Huang, J., Norman, M., Pettersson, K., Fawcett, W. J., Shalabi, M. M., Metcalfe, A., Gramlich, L., Nelson, G., & Wilson, R. D. (2019). Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (part 3). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.