ChatGPT as Co-author: Are researchers impressed or distressed?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another notable problem is the unedited use of AI-generated outputs as if they were the original work of the researcher.
“Another notable problem is the unedited use of AI-generated outputs as if they were the original work of the researcher (Bhatia & Kulkarni, 2023).”
From GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as Bhatia & Kulkarni, 2023
GAI tools are known to 'hallucinate' and fabricate unfounded information.
“GAI tools are known to”
From Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: Bibliometric analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [11]
GAI can produce inaccurate, biased, or misleading outputs.
“This is important because, as publishers such as Elsevier and SAGE have noted, GAI can produce inaccurate, biased, or misleading outputs.11 13”
From Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: Bibliometric analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [11]
Cites
ChatGPT: five priorities for research
van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 · Cited by 1,842 · see citing works
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove
Stokel-Walker, C. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z · Cited by 868 · see citing works
Loh, H. W., Ooi, C. P., Seoni, S., Barua, P. D., Molinari, F., & Acharya, U. R. (2022) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107161 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
Can ChatGPT draft a research article? An example of population-level vaccine effectiveness analysis
Macdonald, C., Adeloye, D., Sheikh, A., & Rudan, I. (2023) · Journal of Global Health · doi:10.7189/jogh.13.01003 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ganjavi, C., Eppler, M. B., Pekcan, A., Biedermann, B., Abreu, A., Collins, G. S., Gill, I. S., & Cacciamani, G. E. (2024) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-077192 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Bozkurt, A. (2024) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bhatia, G., & Kulkarni, A.
- Affiliations
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot (IN)
- Shamnur Shivashankarappa Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Bhatia, Gayatri
- Venue
- Asian Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-06
- Volume
- 84
- Pages
- 103564
- ISSN
- 1876-2018 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4327922434
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Asian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, AI co-authorship, researcher attitudes, artificial intelligence in research, research ethics
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Humans, Research Personnel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
