Sugar-dependent rats show enhanced intake of unsweetened ethanol
Abstract
Rats show signs of dependence on sugar when it is available intermittently, including bingeing, withdrawal, and cross-sensitization with amphetamine. In the current study, we sought to determine whether sugar-dependent rats would show increased intake of unsweetened ethanol and, conversely, whether intermittent access to ethanol would augment sugar consumption. In Experiment 1, with intermittent versus ad libitum access to ethanol, Sprague-Dawley rats were given escalating concentrations of ethanol (1%, 2%, 4%, 7%, and 9%) over the course of 20 days. Rats in the intermittent ethanol access group, with 12-h daily access, consumed more 4%, 7%, and 9% ethanol during the first hour of access, and more 9% ethanol daily, than did rats in the ad libitum ethanol access group. In Experiment 2, with ethanol as a gateway to sugar intake, the rats from Experiment 1 were switched to 10% sucrose with 12-h daily access for 1 week. Rats in the intermittent ethanol access group consumed significantly more sugar than was consumed by rats in a control group with no prior ethanol experience. In Experiment 3, with sugar as a gateway to ethanol to determine whether sugar dependence leads to increased ethanol intake, four groups were maintained for 21 days according to the following designations: intermittent access to sugar and chow, ad libitum access to sugar and chow, intermittent access to chow, or ad libitum access to chow. Four days later, all groups were switched to intermittent ethanol access, as described in Experiment 1. The group with intermittent access to sugar and chow consumed the most 9% ethanol, supporting the suggestion that sugar dependence alters a rat's proclivity to drink ethanol. These results may relate to the co-morbidity between binge-eating disorders and alcohol intake and the tendency of people abstaining from alcohol to consume excessive amounts of sugar. In conclusion, bingeing on either ethanol or sugar fosters intake of the other.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In rats, access to sugar followed by forced abstinence enhances alcohol intake.
“in rats, access to sugar followed by forced abstinence enhances alcohol intake,193”
From Early life adversity and health-risk behaviors: Proposed psychological and neural mechanisms (2018) · cites this paper as [193]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 149
- Authors
- Avena, N. M., Carrillo, C. A., Needham, L., Leibowitz, S. F., & Hoebel, B. G.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Rockefeller University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hoebel, Bartley G.
- Venue
- Alcohol
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 203-209
- ISSN
- 0741-8329 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043091987
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Alcohol (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA12882, R01AA012882)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH65024, R21MH065024)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-016458, F31DA016458)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Keywords
- ethanol consumption, binge drinking, intermittent access, sucrose, binge eating disorder, alcohol consumption, binge eating
- MeSH terms
- Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Male, Sucrose, Sweetening Agents, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review