Cited by 42Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFluid Dynamics and Mixing

Turbidostat operation of outdoor pilot-scale photobioreactors

Open access
de Vree, Jeroen H., Bosma, Rouke, Wieggers, Rick, Gegic, Snezana, Janssen, Marcel, Barbosa, Maria J., Wijffels, René H.·2016·Algal Research

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.algal.2016.06.006

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microalgae cultivation is mostly done in very diluted biomass concentrations, from 0.2 to 2 g l−1, to avoid large dark zones in the cultivation systems, which leads to low productivities.

    “Microalgae cultivation is mostly done in very diluted biomass concentrations, from 0.2 to 2 g l−1, to avoid large dark zones in the cultivation systems, which leads to low productivities (Bilad et al., 2014; de Vree et al., 2016).”

    From Perspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry (2022) · cites this paper as de Vree et al., 2016

    The indexed Abstract reports experiments at concentrations including 0.25 and 2.0 g L−1 and says higher concentrations produced a steeper light gradient. It does not establish that microalgae are mostly cultivated at 0.2–2 g L−1 to avoid dark zones, or that dilution leads to low productivity; in some reactors, the highest tested concentrations instead reduced productivity. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Microalgae have higher areal productivity and higher biomass production rates than plant crops.

    “When comparing microalgae to plant crops, they present several advantages: they have higher areal productivity and higher biomass production rates, they can grow in diverse and inhospitable environments, they do not compete for land, and some species can grow in seawater (Zeng et al., 2011; de Vree et al., 2016).”

    From Perspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry (2022) · cites this paper as de Vree et al., 2016

    The indexed Abstract passage contains keywords for areal productivity and biomass concentration, but no comparison with plant crops. Searches for the claimed higher productivity and biomass production rates, including searches for plant crops, found no passage addressing that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Microalgae can grow in diverse and inhospitable environments, do not compete for land, and some species can grow in seawater.

    “When comparing microalgae to plant crops, they present several advantages: they have higher areal productivity and higher biomass production rates, they can grow in diverse and inhospitable environments, they do not compete for land, and some species can grow in seawater (Zeng et al., 2011; de Vree et al., 2016).”

    From Perspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry (2022) · cites this paper as de Vree et al., 2016

    The passages labeled Abstract contain bibliographic details and keywords, not statements about growth in inhospitable environments, land competition, or seawater. Searches for those terms and paraphrases found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Vree, J. H., Bosma, R., Wieggers, R., Gegic, S., Janssen, M., Barbosa, M. J., & Wijffels, R. H.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Nord University (NO)
Venue
Algal Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
18
Pages
198-208
ISSN
2211-9264 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2466410968
Cited by
42
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Algal Research (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation (TRCDKI/2010/0956)
  • Province of Gelderland and Biosolar Cells
  • BASF
  • BioOils
  • Drie Wilgen Development
  • DSM
  • Exxon Mobil
  • GEA Westfalia Separator
  • Heliae
  • Neste
  • Nijhuis
  • Paques
  • Cellulac
  • Proviron
  • Roquette
  • SABIC
  • Simris Alg
  • Staatsolie Suriname
  • Synthetic Genomics
  • TOTAL
  • Unilever
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Keywords
turbidostat, outdoor photobioreactor, Nannochloropsis, areal productivity, photosynthetic efficiency, biomass concentration, raceway ponds, light interception, optical absorption coefficient, microalgae growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review