A comparative assessment of microwave assisted (MAE) and conventional solid-liquid (SLE) techniques for the extraction of phloroglucinol from brown seaweed
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The extraction yield of polyphenols obtained by MAE grew up to 70% when compared to solid-liquid extraction with organic solvents.
“and also that the extraction yield of polyphenols that were obtained by MAE grew up to 70% when compared to solid-liquid extraction with organic solvents.”
From Overview on the Application of Modern Methods for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Marine Macroalgae (2018) · cites this paper as [74]
Season time and processing methods such as drying also affected the concentration of polyphenols.
“Except the taxonomical differences, season time and processing methods (such as drying) also affected the concentration of polyphenols.”
From Overview on the Application of Modern Methods for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Marine Macroalgae (2018) · cites this paper as [74]
Polyphenols content varied not only at taxonomic and geographical levels, but also within each of these levels between orders of algae.
“Results showed that the content varied not only at taxonomic and geographical levels, but also within each of these levels between orders of algae.”
From Overview on the Application of Modern Methods for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Marine Macroalgae (2018) · cites this paper as [74]
Water, as a green solvent, has been the most suitable solvent for efficient extraction of polyphenols when compared to other tested solvents.
“Authors noticed that water, as green solvent, has been the most suitable solvent for efficient extraction of polyphenols when compared to other tested solvents”
From Overview on the Application of Modern Methods for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Marine Macroalgae (2018) · cites this paper as [74]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 82 · Cited by 99
- Authors
- Magnusson, M., Yuen, A. K. L., Zhang, R., Wright, J. T., Taylor, R. B., Maschmeyer, T., & de Nys, R.
- Affiliations
- James Cook University (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Magnusson, Marie
- ORCID
- Venue
- Algal Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- 28-36
- ISSN
- 2211-9264 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2574672505
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 8.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Algal Research (publishedVersion)
- ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Australian Government's Cooperative Research Centre Scheme (DP109602)
- Science and Industry Endowment Fund (SIEF RP03-028)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Keywords
- phloroglucinol, brown algae, polyphenols, microwave-assisted extraction, solid-liquid extraction, Ecklonia radiata, extraction yield
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
