Cited by 65

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gibberellin-regulated protein allergy: Clinical features and cross-reactivity

Inomata, Naoko·2020·Allergology International

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.alit.2019.10.007

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Fig. 1 Gibberellin-regulated proteins (GRPs) identi fi ed as allergens and their cross-reactivity. To date, clinical cross-reactivity between at least four fruit-derived GRPs, Pru p 7, Pru m 7, Cit s 7, and Pun g 7, have been proven. In addition, cross-reactivity between Cypmaclein and two fruit-derived GRPs, Pru p 7 and Pun g 7, has been demonstrated. Left right double arrow indicates cross-reactivity.
Fig. 1 Gibberellin-regulated proteins (GRPs) identi fi ed as allergens and their cross-reactivity. To date, clinical cross-reactivity between at least four fruit-derived GRPs, Pru p 7, Pru m 7, Cit s 7, and Pun g 7, have been proven. In addition, cross-reactivity between Cypmaclein and two fruit-derived GRPs, Pru p 7 and Pun g 7, has been demonstrated. Left right double arrow indicates cross-reactivity.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Fig. 4 The prevalence of Pru p 7-monosensitization in Japanese patients with fruit allergies. Of 100 Japanese patients with fruit allergies, 20 patients had negative ImmunoCAP results for Bet v 1 homologs and pro fi lin. Of these 20 patients, 13 patients had positive speci fi c immunoglobulin E results by enzyme-linked immunoassay and/or skin prick test (SPT) examinations using puri fi ed nPru p 7 as a representative gibberellin-regulated protein (GRP). One patient was ImmunoCAP positive for nPru p 3 as a representative lipid transfer protein (LTP). y GRP-sensitized patients indicate patients with positive results for nPru p 7 in at least one allergic test. z LTP-sensitized patients indicate patients with positive ImmunoCAP results for Pru p 3.
Fig. 4 The prevalence of Pru p 7-monosensitization in Japanese patients with fruit allergies. Of 100 Japanese patients with fruit allergies, 20 patients had negative ImmunoCAP results for Bet v 1 homologs and pro fi lin. Of these 20 patients, 13 patients had positive speci fi c immunoglobulin E results by enzyme-linked immunoassay and/or skin prick test (SPT) examinations using puri fi ed nPru p 7 as a representative gibberellin-regulated protein (GRP). One patient was ImmunoCAP positive for nPru p 3 as a representative lipid transfer protein (LTP). y GRP-sensitized patients indicate patients with positive results for nPru p 7 in at least one allergic test. z LTP-sensitized patients indicate patients with positive ImmunoCAP results for Pru p 3.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Ma, 2003, A survey on the management of pollen-food allergy syndrome in allergy practices, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 112, 784, 10.1016/S0091-6749(03)02008-6 · DOI
  2. Valenta, 1996, Type 1 allergic reactions to plant-derived food: a consequence of primary sensitization to pollen allergens, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 97, 893, 10.1016/S0091-6749(96)80062-5 · DOI
  3. Amlot, 1987, Oral allergy syndrome (OAS): symptoms of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to foods, Clin Allergy, 17, 33, 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1987.tb02317.x · DOI
  4. Fernández-Rivas, 2003, Clinically relevant peach allergy is related to peach lipid transfer protein, Pru p 3, in the Spanish population, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 112, 789, 10.1016/S0091-6749(03)02016-5 · DOI
  5. Asero, 2009, EpidemAAITO: features of food allergy in Italian adults attending allergy clinics: a multicentre study, Clin Exp Allergy, 39, 547, 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03167.x · DOI
  6. Pastorello, 2010, Characterization of the T-cell epitopes of the major peach allergen Pru p 3, Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 153, 1, 10.1159/000301573 · DOI
  7. Mothes-Luksch, 2017, Pru p 3, a marker allergen for lipid transfer protein sensitization also in Central Europe, Allergy, 72, 1415, 10.1111/all.13151 · DOI
  8. Tuppo, 2013, Peamaclein—a new peach allergenic protein: similarities, differences and misleading features compared to Pru p 3, Clin Exp Allergy, 43, 128, 10.1111/cea.12028 · DOI
  9. Inomata, 2014, Identification of peamaclein as a marker allergen related to systemic reactions in peach allergy, Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 112, 175, 10.1016/j.anai.2013.11.003 · DOI
  10. Inomata, 2016, Eyelid edema as a predictive factor for sensitization to Pru p 7 in peach allergy, J Dermatol, 43, 900, 10.1111/1346-8138.13316 · DOI
  11. Inomata, 2017, J Dermatol, 44, 735, 10.1111/1346-8138.13795 · DOI
  12. Sénéchal, 2018, A new allergen family involved in pollen food-associated syndrome: snakin/gibberellin-regulated proteins, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 141, 411, 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.06.041 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Klingebiel, 2019, Pru p 7 sensitization is a predominant cause of severe, cypress pollen-associated peach allergy, Clin Exp Allergy, 49, 526, 10.1111/cea.13345 · DOI
  14. Tuppo, 2019, Isolation of cypress gibberellin-regulated protein: analysis of its structural features and IgE binding competition with homologous allergens, Mol Immunol, 114, 189, 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.07.023 · DOI
  15. Segura, 1999, Snakin-1, a peptide from potato that is active against plant pathogens, Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 12, 16, 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.1.16 · DOI
  16. Nahirñak, 2019, Snakin-1 affects reactive oxygen species and ascorbic acid levels and hormone balance in potato, PLoS One, 14, e0214165, 10.1371/journal.pone.0214165 · DOI
  17. Aubert, 1998, Expression patterns of GASA genes in Arabidopsis thaliana: the GASA 4 gene is up-regulated by gibberellins in meristematic regions, Plant Mol Biol, 36, 871, 10.1023/A:1005938624418 · DOI
  18. Muhammad, 2019, A systematic in silico prediction of gibberellic acid stimulated GASA family members: a novel small peptide contributes to floral architecture and transcriptomic changes induced by external stimuli in rice, J Plant Physiol, 234, 117, 10.1016/j.jplph.2019.02.005 · DOI
  19. Hedden, 2015, A century of gibberellin research, J Plant Growth Regul, 34, 740, 10.1007/s00344-015-9546-1 · DOI
  20. Maeda, 2009, [Anaphylaxis due to peach with negative ImmunoCAP result to peach allergens, including rPru p 1, rPru p 3, AND rPru p 4: a report of two cases], Arerugi, 58, 140
  21. Inomata, 2017, Gibberellin-regulated protein in Japanese apricot is an allergen cross-reactive to Pru p 7, Immun Inflamm Dis, 5, 469, 10.1002/iid3.180 · DOI
  22. Tuppo, 2017, Pomegranate cultivars: identification of the New IgE-binding protein pommaclein and analysis of antioxidant variability, J Agric Food Chem, 65, 2702, 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00092 · DOI
  23. Inomata, 2018, Identification of gibberellin-regulated protein as a new allergen in orange allergy, Clin Exp Allergy, 48, 1509, 10.1111/cea.13247 · DOI
  24. Tuppo, 2014, Structure, stability, and IgE binding of the peach allergen Peamaclein (Pru p 7), Biopolymers, 102, 416, 10.1002/bip.22530 · DOI
  25. Hotta, 2016, Case of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis due to peach with Pru p 7 sensitization, J Dermatol, 43, 222, 10.1111/1346-8138.13163 · DOI
  26. Muraro, 2018, The urgent need for a harmonized severity scoring system for acute allergic reactions, Allergy, 73, 1792, 10.1111/all.13408 · DOI
  27. Ahrazem, 2006, Orange germin-like glycoprotein Cit s 1: an equivocal allergen, Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 139, 96, 10.1159/000090384 · DOI
  28. Ahrazem, 2005, Lipid transfer proteins and allergy to oranges, Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 137, 201, 10.1159/000086332 · DOI
  29. López-Torrejón, 2005, Isolation, cloning and allergenic reactivity of natural profilin Cit s 2, a major orange allergen, Allergy, 60, 1424, 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00903.x · DOI
  30. Shahali, 2012, Differential IgE sensitization to cypress pollen associated to a basic allergen of 14 kDa, FEBSJ, 279, 1445, 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08536.x · DOI
  31. Tamburrini, 2005, Kiwellin, a novel protein from kiwi fruit. Purification, biochemical characterization and identification as an allergen*, Protein J, 24, 423, 10.1007/s10930-005-7638-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Inomata, N.
Venue
Allergology International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
11-18
ISSN
1323-8930
Cited by
65
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26461663)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review