Cited by 7Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsInfection Control in Healthcare

Use of a state regulation for adult vaccination

Hempstead, Katherine, Bresnitz, Eddy, Howell-White, Sandra, Crabtree, Deborah, Scotto Rosato, Nancy·2004·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Influenza and pneumococcal disease are major causes of vaccine-preventable death among the elderly. In an effort to raise immunization rates, New Jersey in 1999 adopted a regulation requiring hospitals to offer pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations to all inpatients aged 65 and over. This study examined the effect of implementation strategies on immunization rates within hospitals in 2000 and 2001.Methods Hospital infection control directors were surveyed and random chart review was conducted from a stratified sample of hospitals. The infection control director's assessment of their institution's success was a major outcome measure.Results Relatively few respondents thought their hospital has been successful in implementing new immunization protocols. Approximately 67% responded that they did not think physicians agreed with the "scope and nature" of the regulation. Physician attitudes led the list of barriers to implementation cited by respondents. Chart review revealed moderate amounts of immunization assessment performed by nurses, but virtually no evidence of physicians' orders for immunization.Conclusions Thus far, there is little evidence that the New Jersey regulation has resulted in a meaningful change in pneumococcal or influenza vaccination practices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.12.011

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mokdad et al. have presented the 9 leading actual or underlying causes of death in the United States.

    “Mokdad et al. have presented the 9 leading “actual” or “underlying” causes of death in the United States,12 as shown in Table 3”

    From The scientific basis for law as a public health tool (2009) · cites this paper as [12]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hempstead, K., Bresnitz, E., Howell-White, S., Crabtree, D., & Scotto Rosato, N.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • New Jersey Department of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Hempstead, Katherine
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
311-314
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042900728
Cited by
7
References
26
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R06 CCR218666)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
adult vaccination, pneumococcal vaccination, influenza vaccination, government regulation, implementation strategies, vaccination coverage, older adults, physician attitudes, implementation barriers, New Jersey
MeSH terms
Aged, Hospitals, Humans, Influenza Vaccines, New Jersey, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Vaccination, Pneumococcal Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review