Tobacco Industry Marketing, Population-Based Tobacco Control, and Smoking Behavior
Abstract
Two of the major influences of cigarette smoking behavior are tobacco industry marketing and public health tobacco-control activities. These vie with each other to influence the proportion of each generation who initiate smoking, the intensity level reached by smokers, and the time before smokers are able to quit successfully. This article provides a brief summary of the evidence associating tobacco marketing practices (organized under the four "Ps" of marketing), with smoking behavior. The evidence for causality in this association is considered convincing. Publicly funded, comprehensive, statewide tobacco-control programs were introduced into the United States in the late 1980s, with money either from tobacco taxes or from legal settlements of states with the tobacco industry. These programs use organized statewide approaches to implement current recommendations on "best practices" to discourage tobacco use, recommendations that have changed over time. During the 1990s, "best practices" evolved to include protection against secondhand smoke, sale of cigarettes to minors, and restrictions on tobacco advertising. Evaluations have been published on four statewide tobacco-control programs (Sydney/Melbourne, California, Massachusetts, and Florida) and a national program aimed at youth (American Legacy Program). For each program, there was a positive association with reduced smoking. The evidence supporting the conclusion that tobacco-control programs reduce smoking behavior is evaluated as strong.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In longitudinal studies, exposure to tobacco marketing is consistently related to positive attitudes and beliefs about tobacco use, experimenting with cigarettes, and becoming a smoker, with a dose-response relation between extent of exposure to marketing and risk.
“In longitudinal studies, exposure to tobacco marketing is consistently related to positive attitudes and beliefs about tobacco use, experimenting with cigarettes, and becoming a smoker, with a dose-response relation between extent of exposure to marketing and risk.”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [477]
The powerful effects of tobacco advertising and promotion on consumer behavior are well documented, particularly among children and adolescents.
“The powerful effects of tobacco advertising and promotion on consumer behavior are well documented, particularly among children and adolescents.22,474–478”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [477]
The clear impact of advertising on tobacco-related attitudes and behaviors provides robust evidence that the absence or limitation of such influences reduces their pro-tobacco effects in youth.
“Overall, the clear impact of advertising on tobacco-related attitudes and behaviors22,474–478 provides robust evidence that the absence or limitation of such influences reduces their pro-tobacco effects in youth.”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [477]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 84 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Pierce, J. P.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pierce, John P.
- ORCID
- Pierce, John P.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- S327-S334
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045318112
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
- Keywords
- tobacco industry marketing, smoking behavior, smoking initiation, smoking intensity, smoking cessation, tobacco control program evaluation, tobacco advertising restrictions, tobacco taxation, youth tobacco prevention, causal evidence
- MeSH terms
- Health Promotion, Humans, Public Policy, Smoking, State Government, Tobacco Use Disorder, United States, Health Behavior, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Industry, Marketing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review