CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cigarette smoking among American Indian youth in Minneapolis-St. Paul

Forster, Jean L., Brokenleg, Isaiah, Rhodes, Kristine L., Lamont, Genelle R., Poupart, John·2008·American Journal of Preventive Medicine
DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Reported prevalence of cigarette smoking among American Indian youth is higher than other racial/ethnic minorities, and limited data indicate that this disparity is especially pronounced in the Upper Midwest of the U.S. The purposes of this study are to measure traditional and recreational tobacco use among American Indian youth in an urban Upper Midwest area, and to identify social and environmental factors associated with recreational tobacco use (cigarette smoking). Methods A cross-sectional convenience sample of 336 American Indian youth aged 11-18 years was given a self-administered survey. Data were analyzed using bivariate chi-square tests and multivariate logistical stepwise regression. Results Almost 37% reported some recreational smoking in the previous 30 days, with about three times as many in the group aged 16-18 years reporting smoking as in the group aged 11-13 years (p Conclusions These results indicate that American Indian youth in this area report high use of recreational tobacco, and the statewide focus on youth smoking prevention has not eliminated the disparity in smoking levels between American Indian youth and Minnesota youth overall. These findings suggest several pathways to reduce cigarette smoking among urban American Indian youth.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Levin, 2002, Geographic variation in cardiovascular disease risk factors among American Indians and comparisons with the corresponding state populations, Ethn Health, 7, 57, 10.1080/13557850220146993 · DOI
  2. 2003, Cancer mortality among American Indians and Alaska Natives—United States, 1994–1998, MMWR, 52, 704
  3. Beauvais, 2007, Prevalence of American Indian adolescent tobacco use: 1993–2004, Subst Use Misuse, 42, 591, 10.1080/10826080701202171 · DOI
  4. Forster, 2007, American Indian Community Tobacco Project Steering Council, Nicotine Tob Res, 9, S29, 10.1080/14622200601083434 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Alesci, 2003, Smoking visibility, perceived acceptability, and frequency in various locations among youth and adults, Prev Med, 36, 272, 10.1016/S0091-7435(02)00029-4 · DOI
  6. Siegel, 2005, Effect of local restaurant smoking regulations on progression to established smoking among youths, Tob Control, 14, 300, 10.1136/tc.2005.012302 · DOI
  7. Forster, 1998, The effects of community policies to reduce youth access to tobacco, Am J Public Health, 88, 1193, 10.2105/AJPH.88.8.1193 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Widome, 2007, Longitudinal patterns of youth access to cigarettes and smoking progression: Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort (MACC) study (2000–2003), Prev Med, 45, 442, 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.016 · DOI
  9. Liang, 2002, Differential effects of cigarette price on youth smoking intensity, Nicotine Tob Res, 4, 109, 10.1080/14622200110103188 · DOI
  10. Lazovich, 2007, Tobacco possession, use, and purchase laws and penalties in Minnesota: enforcement, tobacco diversion programs, and youth awareness, Nicotine Tob Res, 9, S57, 10.1080/14622200601083475 · DOI
  11. Avenevoli, 2003, Familial influences on adolescent smoking, Addiction, 98, 1, 10.1046/j.1360-0443.98.s1.2.x · DOI
  12. Kegler, 2000, The social context of experimenting with cigarettes: American Indian “start stories.”, Am J Health Promot, 15, 89, 10.4278/0890-1171-15.2.89 · DOI
  13. Komro, 2003, Parental, family, and home characteristics associated with cigarette smoking among adolescents, Am J Health Promot, 17, 291, 10.4278/0890-1171-17.5.291 · DOI
  14. Slomkowski, 2005, Sibling effects on smoking in adolescence: evidence for social influence from a genetically informative design, Addiction, 100, 430, 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00965.x · DOI
  15. Turner, 2004, Individual and contextual influences on adolescent smoking, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1021, 175, 10.1196/annals.1308.023 · DOI
  16. Conley Thomson, 2005, Household smoking bans and adolescents' perceived prevalence of smoking and social acceptability of smoking, Prev Med, 41, 349, 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.12.003 · DOI
  17. Mowery, 2004, Progression to established smoking among U.S. youths, Am J Public Health, 94, 331, 10.2105/AJPH.94.2.331 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Forster, J. L., Brokenleg, I., Rhodes, K. L., Lamont, G. R., & Poupart, J.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
S449-S456
ISSN
0749-3797
DOI
10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.005
Cited by
18
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review