Cited by 33Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityElectronic Health Records SystemsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

e-Health Research and Patient-Centered Care

Atienza, Audie A., Hesse, Bradford W., Gustafson, David H., Croyle, Robert T.·2010·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.027

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 33

Authors
Atienza, A. A., Hesse, B. W., Gustafson, D. H., & Croyle, R. T.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Atienza, Audie A.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
85-88
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2202804719
Cited by
33
References
33
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
e-health, patient-centered care, physician-patient relationship, online health information seeking, trust in health information sources, patient-provider communication, health information seeking, patient engagement, health information technology, patient empowerment, quality of care, health care access, health care utilization, health care outcomes, health care disparities
MeSH terms
Diffusion of Innovation, Europe, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Physician-Patient Relations, Research, United States, Patient-Centered Care, Internet, Access to Information, Consumer Health Information, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review