An online stress management workbook for breast cancer
Open accessAbstract
Cognitive behavioral stress management groups have been shown to be decrease psychological symptoms and increase adaptive coping in breast cancer patients, but dissemination of this effective intervention has been challenging. The goal of the present project was to develop an online cognitive behavioral stress management intervention for early stage breast cancer survivors and evaluate its effectiveness using a 2 group × 3 time randomized, waitlist-controlled design. Intervention and waitlist control group participants were assessed at three time points: at baseline; at 10 weeks, after which only intervention participants had used the workbook; and at 20 weeks, after which both groups had used the workbook. Results indicate that at 10 weeks intervention participants showed improved self-efficacy for coping with their cancer and for regulating negative mood and lower levels of cancer-related post-traumatic symptoms as compared to the control group, suggesting that an internet stress management intervention could be effective for helping breast cancer patients increase their confidence in their ability to cope with stress.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This randomized waitlist-controlled trial evaluated an online Coping with Cancer Workbook adapted from cognitive behavioral stress management for breast cancer survivors. Immediate access improved self-efficacy for coping with cancer and negative mood at week 10 and reduced cancer-related post-traumatic symptoms relative to waitlist, with high satisfaction but no effects on benefit finding, social/functional well-being, or positive affect.
Key findings
- Primary outcomes showed a multivariate condition effect, F(3, 98) = 3.04, p = .033, η² = .085; univariate effects were significant for self-efficacy for coping with cancer, F(1, 100) = 5.67, p = .019, η² = .054, and self-efficacy for coping with negative mood, F(1, 100) = 7.58, p = .007, η² = .070, with intervention scores higher than control after controlling for baseline.
- Secondary outcomes showed a condition × time interaction, F(4, 98) = 2.77, p = .031, η² = .102, significant for cancer-related post-traumatic symptoms, F(1, 108) = 9.66, p = .002, η² = .088; symptoms decreased at week 10 in the intervention group but not control, and by week 20 the control group showed comparable reduction. No significant effects were found for benefit finding, social well-being, functional well-being, or positive affect.
- Satisfaction was high: overall impression mean 4.3 (SD = 0.8), “good tool” mean 4.4 (SD = 0.8), and “recommend to a friend” mean 4.4 (SD = 0.8). Usage data showed 29% completed all 10 chapters, participants visited an average 159.8 pages (SD = 93.1) of 195 unique pages (82%), and signed on an average of 13.3 days (SD = 8.8).
- Retention: 115 (87%) completed week 10, 116 (88%) completed week 20, and 111 (84%) completed baseline, week 10, and week 20. Intervention participants were more likely than control participants to miss the week 10 assessment, χ²(1) = 9.32, p = .002, and week 20 assessment, χ²(1) = 8.33, p = .004.
Methods
- Randomized waitlist-controlled trial using a 2 group × 3 time design (baseline, week 10, week 20). Of 210 screened, 132 women were randomized; eligible participants were English-speaking adult women within 18 months of Stage 0, I, II, or III breast cancer diagnosis, reporting at least moderate distress, with phone and internet access. Mean age was 50.9 years (SD = 9.9; range 25–73); 19% endorsed racial/ethnic minority status, 94% had breast cancer-related surgery, 45% chemotherapy, 49% radiation, and 20% were currently undergoing chemotherapy or radiation.
- The intervention was an online Coping with Cancer Workbook modeled on an in-person CBSM intervention, consisting of an introduction and 10 chapters with didactic instruction, interactive exercises, relaxation/guided imagery/meditation, guided expressive writing, weekly homework, video/audio elements, and an asynchronous discussion board. Participants were encouraged to complete one chapter per week; waitlist controls received access after the week 10 assessment. All participants received biweekly phone calls, and email reminders were sent at the start of each workbook week.
- Analysis used MANCOVA controlling for baseline scores and baseline-related covariates, with condition as between-subjects factor and time as within-subjects factor. All randomized participants were invited and included without regard to intervention participation; no imputation was used due to relatively low missing data. Primary outcomes were Cancer Behavior Inventory, Negative Mood Regulation Scale, and Benefit Finding Scale; secondary outcomes included Revised Impact of Event Scale, FACT-B social and functional well-being subscales, and PANAS positive affect.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: the study lacked an active control condition; relaxation exercise practice amount and duration were not tracked; and most participants came from the Love/Avon Army of Women registry and were eager to participate in research, potentially limiting generalizability to the broader community of breast cancer survivors.
- Evident from the text: attrition was differential by condition, with intervention participants more likely to drop out, and no imputation was used; the authors note it is possible that women who did not find the workbook helpful were the ones who dropped out, making results difficult to interpret. The moderated discussion board was not frequently used, and actual enactment of coping skills was not measured.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 40 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Mean rating of whether one would recommend the workbook to a friend with breast cancer was 4.4 (SD = 0.8) on a 5-point scale where 5 indicated strongly agree.
“4.4 (SD = 0.8) on the item assessing whether one would recommend the workbook to a friend with breast cancer (5 indicated strongly agree)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The conditions differed significantly in level of post-traumatic symptoms at week 10 (p < .05).
“Post hoc pairwise comparisons indicated that the conditions differed significantly in level of post-traumatic symptoms at week 10 (p < .05) but not at week 20.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The intervention did not increase positive affect.
“the intervention did not increase positive affect”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mean overall impression of the workbook was 4.3 (SD = 0.8) on a 5-point scale where 5 indicated 'wonderful'.
“4.3 (SD = 0.8) on the overall impression item (5 indicated “wonderful”)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The moderated discussion board was not frequently used.
“it was not frequently used”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Women in the wait-list control group lagged behind until receiving access to the intervention.
“while those in the wait-list control group lagged behind until receiving access to the intervention”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Controlling for baseline scores and collapsing across week 10 and week 20, self-efficacy for coping with cancer scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (p < .05).
“Post-hoc pairwise comparisons revealed that, controlling for baseline scores and collapsing across week 10 and week 20, self-efficacy for coping with cancer and negative mood scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (p < .05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
By week 20, the control group evidenced a comparable reduction in post-traumatic symptoms.
“By week 20, the control group evidenced a comparable reduction in post-traumatic symptoms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The condition by time interaction was significant for cancer-related post-traumatic symptoms, F(1, 108) = 9.66, p = .002, η2 = .088.
“the interaction was significant for cancer-related post-traumatic symptoms, F(1, 108) = 9.66, p = .002, η2 = .088”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Women randomly assigned to use the intervention first showed significantly increased self-efficacy at the week 10 assessment.
“Women who were randomly assigned to use the intervention first showed significantly increased self-efficacy at the week 10 assessment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The main effect of condition was significant for self-efficacy for coping with cancer, F(1, 100) = 5.67, p = .019, η2 = .054.
“the main effect of condition was significant for self-efficacy for coping with cancer, F(1, 100) = 5.67, p = .019, η2 = .054”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The main effect of condition was significant for self-efficacy for coping with negative mood, F(1, 100) = 7.58, p = .007, η2 = .070.
“self-efficacy for coping with negative mood, F(1, 100) = 7.58, p = .007, η2 = .070”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Women in the intervention group maintained gains in self-efficacy from week 10 to week 20.
“Women in the intervention group maintained gains in self-efficacy from week 10 to week 20”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mean rating of whether the workbook was a good tool for breast cancer patients was 4.4 (SD = 0.8) on a 5-point scale where 5 indicated strongly agree.
“4.4 (SD = 0.8) on the item assessing whether the workbook was a good tool for breast cancer patients (5 indicated strongly agree)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
MANCOVA revealed a multivariate condition by time interaction for secondary outcomes, F(4, 98) = 2.77, p = .031, η2 = .102.
“MANCOVA revealed a multivariate condition by time interaction, F(4, 98) = 2.77, p = .031, η2 = .102.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The conditions did not differ significantly in level of post-traumatic symptoms at week 20.
“Post hoc pairwise comparisons indicated that the conditions differed significantly in level of post-traumatic symptoms at week 10 (p < .05) but not at week 20.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The expected condition by time interaction for self-efficacy did not reach significance.
“Although the expected condition by time interaction did not reach significance”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Controlling for baseline scores and collapsing across week 10 and week 20, self-efficacy for coping with negative mood scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (p < .05).
“Post-hoc pairwise comparisons revealed that, controlling for baseline scores and collapsing across week 10 and week 20, self-efficacy for coping with cancer and negative mood scores were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (p < .05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In the present study overall attrition was low.
“In the present study overall attrition was low”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Women assigned to the intervention group had significantly higher attrition rates than control group women.
“women assigned to the intervention group had significantly higher attrition rates than control group women”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The most common reason cited by participants in both groups who formally withdrew from the study was a lack of time.
“The most common reason cited by participants in both groups who formally withdrew from the study was a lack of time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast Cancer
The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer bring psychosocial consequences for many patients, ranging from mild distress to diagnosable mood and anxiety disorders.
“The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer bring psychosocial consequences for many patients (Glanz & Lerman, 1992; Moyer & Salovey, 1996), ranging from mild distress to diagnosable mood and anxiety disorders (Antoni, 2003; Holland, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast Cancer
Patients already turn to the internet for health information.
“Patients already turn to the internet for health information (Atienza et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Atienza et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast Cancer
Coping self-efficacy is associated with favorable outcomes in cancer-related contexts, including reduced anxiety, depression and improved quality of life.
“coping self-efficacy has been found to be associated with favorable outcomes in cancer-related contexts, including reduced anxiety, depression and improved quality of life (Giese-Davis et al., 1999; Merluzzi & Martinez Sanchez, 1997; Philip et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Giese-Davis et al., 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Merluzzi & Martinez Sanchez, 1997 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Philip et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast Cancer
Adaptive coping skills can be learned.
“According to Lazarus and Folkmans’ Transactional Model of Stress and Coping (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984), adaptive coping skills can be learned.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lazarus & Folkman, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast Cancer
A subset of breast cancer patients experience significant levels of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic symptoms (e.g., intrusive thoughts, hyper-arousal) or adjustment disorder symptoms that make successful coping with cancer-related stressors more difficult.
“a subset of breast cancer patients experience significant levels of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic symptoms (e.g., intrusive thoughts, hyper-arousal) or adjustment disorder symptoms that make successful coping with cancer-related stressors more difficult (e.g., Khan et al., 2012; Mehnert & Koch, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Khan et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mehnert & Koch, 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast Cancer
CBSM seems effective in applied clinical settings with cancer patients.
“CBSM also seems effective in applied clinical settings with cancer patients (e.g., Beatty & Koczwara, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beatty & Koczwara, 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast Cancer
Effects of CBSM appear durable, with women's distress continuing to decrease for up to 12 months following treatment.
“Further, the effects of CBSM appear to be durable, with women’s distress continuing to decrease for up to 12 months following treatment (Antoni, Wimberly, et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Antoni, Wimberly, et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast Cancer
The internet is one way to overcome logistical and organizational barriers to dissemination of psychosocial interventions.
“The internet is one way to overcome these logistical and organizational barriers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The study was powered to detect medium between-groups effects in the primary outcome variables in the context of repeated measures MANOVA.
“The study was powered to detect medium between-groups effects in the primary outcome variables in the context of repeated measures MANOVA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
84% (111) of randomized participants completed baseline, week 10, and week 20 assessments.
“As shown in Figure 1, 84% (111) of randomized participants completed baseline, week 10, and week 20 assessments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Chi-square and t-tests revealed no significant differences between the intervention and control groups on any of the demographic, treatment, or outcome variables at baseline.
“Chi-square and t-tests revealed no significant differences between the intervention and control groups on any of the demographic, treatment, or outcome variables at baseline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
High coping self-efficacy could decrease stress by changing the appraisal of stressors.
“High coping self-efficacy could decrease stress by changing the appraisal of stressors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
There were no significant differences between 20-week completers and non-completers with regard to any of the demographic, background, or baseline outcome variables.
“Again, there were no significant differences between 20 week completers and non-completers with regard to any of the demographic, background, or baseline outcome variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The findings from the present Cancer Coping Workbook study are consistent with findings from studies of other web-based psychological interventions, which appear to work about as well as in-person interventions for conditions such as pain, asthma, and improving health behaviors.
“The findings from the present Cancer Coping Workbook study are consistent with findings from studies of other web-based psychological interventions, which appear to work about as well as in-person interventions for conditions such as pain, asthma, and improving health behaviors (Cuijpers, 2008; Wantland, 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Study design and conductown data
There were no significant differences between 10-week completers and non-completers with regard to any of the demographic, background, or baseline outcome variables.
“Otherwise, there were no significant differences between 10 week completers and non-completers with regard to any of the demographic, background, or baseline outcome variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Women who did not complete the 20-week assessment were more likely to be in the intervention group than the control group, χ2(1) = 8.33, p = .004, N = 132.
“However, a chi-square test revealed that women who did not complete the 20 week assessment were more likely to be in the intervention group than the control group, χ2(1) = 8.33, p = .004, N = 132.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
CBT appears particularly amenable to translation to self-directed web-based formats.
“CBT appears particularly amenable to translation to self-directed web-based formats.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Andersson & Cuijpers, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Spek et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
Power analysis using G*Power 3 indicated that a sample size of N = 98 with both pretest and posttest data would yield power of .80 to detect a medium effect size (Cohen's f = .25).
“Power analysis conducted using G*Power 3 software (Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, & Buchner, 2007) indicated that a sample size of N = 98 with both pretest and posttest data would yield power of .80 to detect a medium effect size (Cohen’s f = .25).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, & Buchner, 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Randomized women who did not complete the 10-week assessment were more likely to be in the intervention group than the control group, χ2(1) = 9.32, p = .002, N = 132.
“A chi-square test revealed that randomized women who did not complete the 10 week assessment were more likely to be in the intervention group than the control group, χ2(1) = 9.32, p = .002, N = 132.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The percentage of participants who completed all 10 chapters did not differ between groups.
“A chi square test indicated that this percentage did not differ between groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
All content in the Coping with Cancer Workbook was written at or below a sixth-grade reading level, as determined by the Flesch-Kincaid method.
“All content was written at or below a sixth-grade reading level, as determined by the Flesch-Kincaid method (Kincaid et al., 1975).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kincaid et al., 1975
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The present study joins an emerging literature supporting the effectiveness of internet based interventions for cancer patients.
“The present study joins an emerging literature supporting the effectiveness of internet based interventions for cancer patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Limitations of the study include the lack of an active control condition.
“Limitations of the study include the lack of an active control condition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Email does seem to be an effective method of prompting participation in online health interventions.
“Email does seem to be an effective method of prompting participation in online health interventions (see Fry & Neff, 2009 for a review).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fry & Neff, 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The sample composition may limit generalizability of our findings to the general community of breast cancer survivors.
“it may perhaps limit generalizability of our findings to the general community of breast cancer survivors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
In conclusion, it appears that an internet intervention based on an empirically supported cognitive behavioral stress management intervention is effective for helping breast cancer patients live with more confidence in their ability to cope with stress.
“In conclusion, it appears that an internet intervention based on an empirically supported cognitive behavioral stress management intervention is effective for helping breast cancer patients live with more confidence in their ability to cope with stress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 29
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast CancerOur literature search revealed only two CBT-based online interventions for cancer patients, one by Owen et al. (2005) and one by Beatty et al. (2011), both providing structured CBT for distressed cancer patients.
“Our literature search revealed only two CBT-based online interventions for cancer patients, one developed by Owen and colleagues (2005) and the other by Beatty and colleagues (2011), both providing structured CBT for distressed cancer patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Owen et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Beatty et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong secondary outcomes, there was a significant condition by time interaction for cancer-related post-traumatic symptoms, which decreased at week 10 in the intervention group but not in the control group.
“there was a significant condition by time interaction for cancer-related post-traumatic symptoms, which decreased at week 10 in the intervention group but not in the control group”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo significant differences were found in regard to either social or functional well-being.
“No significant differences were found in regard to either social or functional well-being”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInspection of the 95% confidence intervals for both measures of self-efficacy showed they did not overlap at week 10 but did overlap at week 20.
“support for this hypothesis was found in inspection of the 95% confidence intervals for both measures of self-efficacy, which did not overlap at week 10 but did overlap at week 20”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUnlike the in-person CBSM group intervention, the online adaptation did not appear to affect finding benefit in the cancer experience, for which no significant effects or interactions were found.
“unlike the in-person CBSM group intervention, the online adaptation did not appear to affect finding benefit in the cancer experience, for which we found no significant effects or interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataMANCOVA revealed a multivariate main effect for condition on primary outcomes (self-efficacy for coping with cancer and negative mood), F(3, 98) = 3.04, p = .033, η2 = .085.
“MANCOVA revealed a multivariate main effect for condition, F(3, 98) = 3.04, p = .033, η2 = .085.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne hundred thirty-two women completed baseline measures and were randomized.
“One hundred thirty-two women completed baseline measures and were randomized.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataNo acute exacerbations of distress were encountered during the biweekly phone calls.
“Acute exacerbations of distress would have prompted further intervention; however, none were encountered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe condition by time interaction was not significant for any of the other secondary outcomes, and there were no other significant effects.
“The interaction was not significant for any of the other secondary outcomes, and there were no other significant effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUse of the workbook was not significantly different between intervention and control women even though the intervention women were contacted by phone five times during the 10 week intervention period and asked about their workbook use.
“use of the workbook was not significantly different between intervention and control women even though the intervention women were contacted by phone five times during the 10 week intervention period and asked about their workbook use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMost of our sample came from the Love/Avon Army of Women research registry and was comprised of women eager to participate in research that might help other women with breast cancer.
“most of our sample came from the Love/Avon Army of Women research registry and was comprised of women eager to participate in research that might help other women with breast cancer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast CancerMost women diagnosed with breast cancer experience heightened distress.
“Most women diagnosed with breast cancer experience heightened distress (e.g., Boehmke & Brown, 2005)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boehmke & Brown, 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll procedures were approved by a human subjects review board, including a waiver of written consent.
“All procedures were approved by a human subjects review board, including a waiver of written consent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast CancerDissemination of empirically-validated psychological interventions for cancer patients is challenging, and many patients who could benefit do not receive it.
“Despite substantial evidence for the effectiveness of psychological interventions in reducing distress among cancer patients, dissemination of empirically-validated interventions is challenging, and many patients who could benefit from this intervention do not receive it (Ellis et al., 2005; Jacobsen, 2009; Kerner et al., 2005; Stanton, 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast CancerInterventions that include coping skills and stress management training increase coping self-efficacy, which can empower patients to face the future with less anxiety.
“Such interventions not only help patients learn new skills to cope with their current stressors, but also serve to increase coping self-efficacy (i.e., confidence in the ability to cope with cancer), which can empower patients to face the future with less anxiety (Bandura, 1991).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bandura, 1991 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast CancerThe gap in dissemination and implementation of empirically supported interventions is due to lack of therapists trained in delivering psychosocial interventions and because most interventions are delivered in urban clinic- and university-based settings using in-person groups, which can be difficult to access and fit into survivors' schedules.
“This gap in the dissemination and implementation of empirically supported interventions is due not only to a lack of therapists trained in delivering psychosocial interventions, but also to the fact that most interventions are delivered in urban clinic- and university-based settings using in-person groups, which can be difficult to access and fit into survivors’ schedules (Institute of Medicine, 2”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Institute of Medicine, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast CancerInterventions that include coping skills and stress management training for cancer patients increase positive coping and decrease symptoms.
“interventions that include coping skills and stress management training for cancer patients have been found to increase positive coping and decrease symptoms (e.g., Andersen et al., 2004; Antoni et al., 2001; Cunningham et al., 1993; Cunningham & Tocco, 1989; Telch & Telch, 1986; Yates et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast CancerThe Beatty et al. (2011) intervention was modeled on existing self-help materials and appears promising, but has only been evaluated in a small pilot study.
“The Beatty et al (2011) intervention was modeled on existing self-help materials and appears promising, although to date it has only been evaluated in a small pilot study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beatty et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataParticipants were randomized into intervention or wait-list control according to a computerized random number table.
“Upon completing the questionnaires, participants were randomized into the intervention or wait-list control condition according to a computerized random number table.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast CancerThe Owen et al. (2005) study investigated an intervention not modeled on a specific empirically-validated intervention, and a small randomized trial revealed no differences between intervention and wait-list control.
“The Owen et al study (2005) investigated an intervention that was not modeled on a specific empirically-validated intervention and a small randomized trial of the intervention revealed no differences between the intervention group and a wait-list control condition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Owen et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ An Online Stress Management Workbook for Breast CancerAccording to a 2011 Pew Report, the internet is second only to physicians as a significant source of health information for 80% of online users.
“A 2011 Pew Report states that the internet is second only to physicians as a significant source of health information for 80% of online users (Fox, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fox, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenDependent variables were not assessed during the biweekly phone calls and no explicit adherence troubleshooting took place.
“Dependent variables were not assessed during these calls and no explicit adherence troubleshooting took place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe research assistant was not blind to condition assignment because intervention participants were asked about workbook use and offered technical support.
“Because intervention participants were also asked about their use of the workbook and offered technical support if necessary, the research assistant was not blind to condition assignment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningDue to the relatively low amount of missing data and the psychosocial nature of the intervention and outcome variables, we did not impute data.
“Due to the relatively low amount of missing data and the psychosocial nature of the intervention and outcome variables, we did not impute data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll randomized participants were invited to complete outcome measures and were included in the analyses, without regard to their degree of participation in the intervention.
“All randomized participants were invited to complete outcome measures and were included in the analyses, without regard to their degree of participation in the intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCronbach's alpha for the Negative Mood Regulation Scale full scale was .902.
“Cronbach’s alpha for the full scale was .902.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn the present study, Cronbach's alpha for the Cancer Behavior Inventory v2.0 full scale was .945.
“In the present study, Cronbach’s alpha for the full scale was .945.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCronbach's alpha for the Revised Impact of Event Scale full scale was .920.
“Cronbach’s alpha for the full scale was .920.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataParticipants signed on to the workbook on an average of 13.3 (SD = 8.8) days.
“Participants signed on to the workbook on an average of 13.3 (SD = 8.8) days.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGiven the time limited nature of the study, and the fact that there were never more than 50 women in the intervention arm of the study at any one time, it is perhaps not surprising that the users did not come together to form a support community.
“Given the time limited nature of the study, and the fact that there were never more than 50 women in the intervention arm of the study at any one time, it is perhaps not surprising that the users did not come together to form a support community.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCronbach's alpha for the Benefit Finding Scale full scale was .941.
“Cronbach’s alpha for the full scale was .941.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe week 10 assessment was completed by 115 (87%) of participants.
“Ten weeks after completing the baseline assessment, all participants were emailed a link to the week 10 assessment which was completed by 115 (87%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLazarus and Folkman's theory of stress, appraisal and coping states that feeling stressed results from appraising a situation as requiring more personal resources than one possesses.
“Lazarus and Folkman’s theory of stress, appraisal and coping (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984; Folkman, 2010) states that feeling stressed results from appraising a situation as requiring more personal resources than one possesses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lazarus & Folkman, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Folkman, 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataNumber of pages and number of days did not differ between groups.
“Independent groups t-tests indicated that number of pages and number of days did not differ between groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCronbach's alpha for the social well-being subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast was .833.
“Cronbach’s alphas for social and functional wellbeing subscales were .833 and .839, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAcross conditions, 29% of participants completed all 10 chapters (defined as accessing the final page of each chapter).
“Across conditions, 29% of participants completed all 10 chapters (defined as accessing the final page of each chapter).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCronbach's alpha for the functional well-being subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast was .839.
“Cronbach’s alphas for social and functional wellbeing subscales were .833 and .839, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCronbach's alpha for the five positive affect items was .844.
“Cronbach’s alpha for the five items was .844.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe week 20 assessment was completed by 116 (88%) of participants.
“Ten weeks after completing the week 10 assessment, all participants were emailed a link to the week 20 assessment completed by 116 (88%) of the participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationCoping self-efficacy is a theoretically important proxy for coping.
“coping self-efficacy is a theoretically important proxy for coping”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lazarus & Folkman, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Folkman, 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe pattern of results suggests that the condition by time interaction did not reach significance because women in the wait-list control group did not entirely catch up to the intervention group at week 20 although they were not significantly different at that time.
“The pattern of results apparent in the graphs suggests that the condition by time interaction did not reach significance because women in the wait-list control group did not entirely catch up to the intervention group at week 20 although they were not significantly different at that time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMeta-analyses have shown that internet-based CBT interventions are effective overall, with effect sizes similar to those found in meta-analyses of face-to-face treatment.
“Meta-analyses have shown that internet-based CBT interventions are effective overall, with effect sizes similar to those found in meta-analyses of face-to-face treatment (Andersson & Cuijpers, 2009; Spek et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Andersson & Cuijpers, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Spek et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataParticipants visited an average 159.8 pages (SD = 93.1) of the 195 unique pages of the workbook (i.e., 82%).
“Participants visited an average 159.8 pages (SD = 93.1) of the 195 unique pages of the workbook (i.e., 82%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe present study found a self-directed online version of an empirically-supported cognitive behavioral stress management intervention for breast cancer patients to be effective in increasing coping self-efficacy, specifically self-efficacy for coping with cancer and self-efficacy for regulating negative mood.
“The present study found a self-directed online version of an empirically-supported cognitive behavioral stress management intervention for breast cancer patients to be effective in increasing coping self-efficacy, specifically self-efficacy for coping with cancer and self-efficacy for regulating negative mood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe development process for the Coping with Cancer Workbook was iterative and included review by content and cultural competency experts, focus groups, and usability testing with breast cancer survivors.
“The development process was iterative and included review by content and cultural competency experts in addition to focus groups and usability testing with breast cancer survivors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationWomen who are more confident in their coping abilities may be more likely to appraise situations as manageable, resulting in decreased stress levels and the negative physiological and affective correlates of stress.
“Women who are more confident in their coping abilities may be more likely to appraise situations as manageable, resulting in decreased stress levels and the negative physiological and affective correlates of stress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe Coping with Cancer Workbook was developed by a team of clinical psychologists and oncology social workers with expertise in CBT and the original in-person CBSM intervention, as well as experience translating face-to-face interventions into self-directed internet interventions.
“the Coping with Cancer Workbook was developed by a team of clinical psychologists and oncology social workers with expertise in CBT interventions in general and the original in-person CBSM intervention in particular, as well as experience in translating face-to-face interventions into self-directed internet interventions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere are a number of existing active online communities for breast cancer survivors with memberships that number in the thousands.
“There are a number of existing active online communities for breast cancer survivors with memberships that number in the thousands (e.g., www.youngsurvival.org).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites www.youngsurvival.org
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThis differential attrition rate is a weakness of the study as it is possible that women who did not find the workbook helpful were the ones who dropped out of the study, making it difficult to interpret the results.
“This differential attrition rate is a weakness of the study as it is possible that women who did not find the workbook helpful were the ones who dropped out of the study, making it difficult to interpret the results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningWhile we were able to use server logs to track participation in the online intervention, it is unclear how many women practiced the relaxation exercises and for how long.
“While we were able to use server logs to track participation in the online intervention, it is unclear how many women practiced the relaxation exercises and for how long.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe phone call protocol was instituted, in part, to keep the control women engaged in the study, and that strategy seems to have been successful.
“We instituted the phone call protocol, in part, to keep the control women engaged in the study and that strategy seems to have been successful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Most web sites for cancer patients are not structured interventions.
“Although web sites exist in abundance for cancer patients, most are not structured interventions.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The number of iCBT studies targeting the symptoms of depression and anxiety in people living with breast cancer is very limited, and the available interventions were self-guided, i.e., no supporter or therapist provided feedback to the users on the programme.
“The number of iCBT studies targeting the symptoms of depression and anxiety in people living with breast cancer is indeed very limited (Carpenter et al., 2014; Owen et al., 2005) and the available interventions were self-guided, i.e., no supporter or therapist provided feedback to the users on the programme.”
From A randomised controlled trial comparing internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) with and without main carer access versus treatment-as-usual for depression and anxiety among breast cancer survivors: Study protocol (2021) · cites this paper as Carpenter et al., 2014
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredUptake was lower than reported uptake of online psychological interventions for breast cancer survivors.
“while uptake was lower than reported uptake of online psychological interventions for breast cancer survivors (e.g. [7, 11])”
From Uptake and adherence to an online intervention for cancer-related distress: older age is not a barrier to adherence but may be a barrier to uptake (2017) · cites this paper as [7]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentχ²(1) = 9.32reported p = .002 · recomputed p = .002
“χ2(1) = 9.32, p = .002”
- Consistentχ²(1) = 8.33reported p = .004 · recomputed p = .004
“χ2(1) = 8.33, p = .004”
- ConsistentF(3, 98) = 3.04reported p = .033 · recomputed p = .033
“F(3, 98) = 3.04, p = .033”
- ConsistentF(1, 100) = 5.67reported p = .019 · recomputed p = .019
“F(1, 100) = 5.67, p = .019”
- ConsistentF(1, 100) = 7.58reported p = .007 · recomputed p = .007
“F(1, 100) = 7.58, p = .007”
- ConsistentF(4, 98) = 2.77reported p = .031 · recomputed p = .031
“F(4, 98) = 2.77, p = .031”
- ConsistentF(1, 108) = 9.66reported p = .002 · recomputed p = .002
“F(1, 108) = 9.66, p = .002”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,588 · see citing works
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971 · see citing works
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,406 · see citing works
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,385 · see citing works
Eysenck, H. J. (1985) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90087-7 · Cited by 32,026 · see citing works
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833 · see citing works
Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress
Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004 · Cited by 7,813 · see citing works
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875 · see citing works
Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, Jr., Robert P., R., Richard L., C., & Brad, S. (1975) · doi:10.21236/ada006655 · Cited by 3,497 · see citing works
The Impact of Event Scale: Revised
Weiss, D. S. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70990-1_10 · Cited by 3,008 · see citing works
Brady, M. J., Cella, D. F., Mo, F., Bonomi, A. E., Tulsky, D. S., Lloyd, S. R., Deasy, S., Cobleigh, M., & Shiomoto, G. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.974 · Cited by 1,752 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Social and functional well-being were assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (Brady et al., 1997), which consists of thirty-seven items rated on a 5-point Likert scale with response options ranging from 0, not at all, to 4, very much.”
MethodInternet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis
SPEK, V., CUIJPERS, P., NYKLÍČEK, I., RIPER, H., KEYZER, J., & POP, V. (2007) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291706008944 · Cited by 1,586 · see citing works
Antoni, M. H., Lehman, J. M., Kilbourn, K. M., Boyers, A. E., Culver, J. L., Alferi, S. M., Yount, S. E., McGregor, B. A., Arena, P. L., Harris, S. D., et al. (2001) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.20.1.20 · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
Self-citationAntoni, M. H., Lehman, J. M., Klibourn, K. M., Boyers, A. E., Culver, J. L., Alferi, S. M., Yount, S., McGregor, B. A., Arena, P. L., Harris, S. D., et al. (2001) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.20.1.20 · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works
Self-citationWantland, D. J., Portillo, C. J., Holzemer, W. L., Slaughter, R., & McGhee, E. M. (2004) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6.4.e40 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial
Christensen, H. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.37945.566632.ee · Cited by 928 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some countries with national health services promote and support evidence-based internet interventions (e.g. the MoodGym depression intervention in Australia which has been used by at least 30,000 people, Christensen et al., 2004, 2002).”
Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., & Rodgers, B. (1999) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00251-7 · Cited by 850 · see citing works
Cancer Care for the Whole Patient
Institute of Medicine (2008) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/11993 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
Catanzaro, S. J., & Mearns, J. (1990) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.1990.9674019 · Cited by 609 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Self-efficacy for coping with negative mood was assessed with the Negative Mood Regulation Scale (NMR; Catanzaro & Mearns, 1990), a 30-item, self-rated scale designed to measure the strength of beliefs in one’s ability to alter negative mood states using a variety of emotion regulation strategies.”
Catanzaro, S., & Mearns, J. (1990) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5403&4_11 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
Internet-administered cognitive behavior therapy for health problems: a systematic review
Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., & Andersson, G. (2008) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-007-9144-1 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
Folkman, S. (2010) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1836 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer
Winzelberg, A. J., Classen, C., Alpers, G. W., Roberts, H., Koopman, C., Adams, R. E., Ernst, H., Dev, P., & Taylor, C. B. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11174 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Fry, J. P., & Neff, R. A. (2009) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1138 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs
(2007) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e718322007-001 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Psychological, behavioral, and immune changes after a psychological intervention: a clinical trial
Andersen, B. L., Farrar, W. B., Golden-Kreutz, D. M., Glaser, R., Emery, C. F., Crespin, T. R., Shapiro, C. L., & Carson, W. E. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.06.030 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Psychosocial concerns and interventions for cancer survivors
Stanton, A. L. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.06.8775 · Cited by 409 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…of psychological interventions in reducing distress among cancer patients, dissemination of empirically-validated interventions is challenging, and many patients who could benefit from this intervention do not receive it (Ellis et al., 2005; Jacobsen, 2009; Kerner et al., 2005; Stanton, 2006).”
Mehnert, A., & Koch, U. (2007) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1057 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Carver, C. S., & Antoni, M. H. (2004) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.6.595 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
How Stress Management Improves Quality of Life After Treatment for Breast Cancer.
Antoni, M. H., Lechner, S. C., Kazi, A., Wimberly, S. R., Sifre, T., Urcuyo, K. R., Phillips, K. K., Glück, S., & Carver, C. S. (2006) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.74.6.1152 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Hegel, M. T., Moore, C. P., Collins, E. D., Kearing, S., Gillock, K. L., Riggs, R. L., Clay, K. F., & Ahles, T. A. (2006) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22335 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Christensen, H., Griffiths, K. M., & Korten, A. (2002) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4.1.e3 · Cited by 292 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some countries with national health services promote and support evidence-based internet interventions (e.g. the MoodGym depression intervention in Australia which has been used by at least 30,000 people, Christensen et al., 2004, 2002).”
Psychosocial Impact of Breast Cancer: A Critical Review
Glanz, K., & Lerman, C. (1992) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/14.3.204 · Cited by 292 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer bring psychosocial consequences for many patients (Glanz & Lerman, 1992; Moyer & Salovey, 1996), ranging from mild distress to diagnosable mood and anxiety disorders (Antoni, 2003; Holland, 1998).”
Telch, C. F., & Telch, M. J. (1986) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.54.6.802 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Kerner, J., Rimer, B., & Emmons, K. (2005) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.5.443 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
The Social Life of Health Information
Fox, S., & Jones, S. (2009) · Issue Lab (Candid) · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma
Lieberman, M. A., Golant, M., Giese‐Davis, J., Winzlenberg, A., Benjamin, H., Humphreys, K. N., Kronenwetter, C., Russo, S., & Spiegel, D. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11145 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
McGregor, B. A., Antoni, M. H., Boyers, A. E., Alferi, S. M., Blomberg, B. B., & Carver, C. S. (2004) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(03)00036-9 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Self-citationAntoni, M. H., Wimberly, S. R., Lechner, S. C., Kazi, A., Sifre, T., Urcuyo, K. R., Phillips, K. K., Smith, R. G., Petronis, V. M., Guellati, S., et al. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.10.1791 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
What Makes Internet Therapy Work?
Andersson, G., Carlbring, P., Berger, T., Almlöv, J., & Cuijpers, P. (2009) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506070902916400 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Self‐efficacy for coping with cancer: revision of the Cancer Behavior Inventory (version 2.0)
Merluzzi, T. V., Nairn, R. C., Hegde, K., Sanchez, M. A. M., & Dunn, L. (2001) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.511 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Randomized pilot of a self-guided internet coping group for women with early-stage breast cancer
Owen, J. E., Klapow, J. C., Roth, D. L., Shuster, J. L., Bellis, J., Meredith, R., & Tucker, D. C. (2005) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm3001_7 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Merluzzi, T. V., & Martinez Sanchez, M. A. (1997) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.16.2.163 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Yates, P. M., Aranda, S. K., Hargraves, M., Mirolo, B. R., Clavarino, A. M., McLachlan, S., & Skerman, H. M. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.01.271 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Stress management intervention for women with breast cancer.
Antoni, M. H. (2003) · doi:10.1037/10488-000 · Cited by 148 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer bring psychosocial consequences for many patients (Glanz & Lerman, 1992; Moyer & Salovey, 1996), ranging from mild distress to diagnosable mood and anxiety disorders (Antoni, 2003; Holland, 1998).”
Merluzzi, T. V., & Sanchez, M. A. M. (1997) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.16.2.163 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Psychosocial sequelae of breast cancer and its treatment
Moyer, A., & Salovey, P. (1996) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02909583 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Kim, E., Han, J. Y., Moon, T. J., Shaw, B. R., Shah, D. V., Mctavish, F. M., & Gustafson, D. H. (2011) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1942 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
A randomized trial of group psychoeducational therapy for cancer patients
Cunningham, A. J., & Tocco, E. K. (1989) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/0738-3991(89)90046-3 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Depression and cancer survivorship: importance of coping self‐efficacy in post‐treatment survivors
Philip, E. J., Merluzzi, T. V., Zhang, Z. J., & Heitzmann, C. A. (2012) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3088 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Khan, F., Amatya, B., Pallant, J., & Rajapaksa, I. (2012) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2012.01.013 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Ellis, P., Robinson, P., Ciliska, D., Armour, T., Brouwers, M., O'Brien, M. A., Sussman, J., & Raina, P. (2005) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.5.488 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Promoting evidence‐based psychosocial care for cancer patients
Jacobsen, P. B. (2009) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1468 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Which Cancer Patients Benefit Most from a Brief, Group, Coping Skills Program?
Cunningham, A. J., Lockwood, G. A., & Edmonds, C. V. I. (1993) · The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine · doi:10.2190/eq7n-2ufr-ebhj-qw4p · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Antoni, M. H. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.10.1791 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
e-Health Research and Patient-Centered Care
Atienza, A. A., Hesse, B. W., Gustafson, D. H., & Croyle, R. T. (2010) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.027 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Beatty, L., Koczwara, B., & Wade, T. (2011) · E-Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.7790/ejap.v7i2.256 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
An effectiveness study of a CBT group program for women with breast cancer
Beatty, L., & Koczwara, B. (2010) · Clinical Psychologist · doi:10.1080/13284207.2010.500307 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Predictors of symptom distress in women with breast cancer during the first chemotherapy cycle
Boehmke, M. M., & Brown, J. K. (2005) · Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal · doi:10.5737/1181912x154215220 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Most women diagnosed with breast cancer experience heightened distress (e.g. Boehmke & Brown, 2005), and a subset of breast cancer patients experience significant levels of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic symptoms (e.g. intrusive thoughts, hyper-arousal) or adjustment disorder symptoms that…”
Stress management intervention for women with breast cancer: Participant's workbook.
Antoni, M. H. (2003) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10479-000 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Assessing psychological trauma
Tehrani, N. (2004) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203500620-23 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Giese-Davis, J., Koopman, C., Butler, L. D., Classen, C., Morrow, G. R., & Spiegel, D. (1999). Self-efficacy with emotions predicts higher quality of life in primary breast cancer patients. In self-efficacy and cancer: Theory, assessment and treatment. Symposium conducted at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, San Diego, CA.
- Holland, J. C. (1998). Psycho-Oncology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kuester, A., Niemeyer, H., & Knaevelsrud, C. (2016) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.11.004 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Chirico, A., Lucidi, F., Merluzzi, T. V., Alivernini, F., Laurentiis, M. D., Botti, G., & Giordano, A. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.15758 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
van den Berg, S. W., Gielissen, M. F. M., Custers, J. A. E., van der Graaf, W. T. A., Ottevanger, P. B., & Prins, J. B. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.54.9386 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
eHealth for improving quality of life in breast cancer patients: A systematic review
Triberti, S., Savioni, L., Sebri, V., & Pravettoni, G. (2019) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.01.003 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Ye, M., Du, K., Zhou, J., Zhou, Q., Shou, M., Hu, B., Jiang, P., Dong, N., He, L., Liang, S., et al. (2018) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4687 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Willems, R. A., Bolman, C. A. W., Mesters, I., Kanera, I. M., Beaulen, A. A. J. M., & Lechner, L. (2016) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4113 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Electronic Health Interventions for Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
Singleton, A. C., Raeside, R., Hyun, K. K., Partridge, S. R., Tanna, G. L. D., Hafiz, N., Tu, Q., Tat-Ko, J., Sum, S. C. M., Sherman, K. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.01171 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Chen, Y.-Y., Guan, B.-S., Li, Z.-K., & Li, X.-Y. (2018) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x16686777 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Bantum, E. O., Albright, C. L., White, K. K. L., Berenberg, J. L., Layi, G., Ritter, P. L., Laurent, D. D., Plant, K., & Lorig, K. R. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3020 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Lengacher, C. A., Reich, R. R., Ramesar, S., Alinat, C. B., Moscoso, M., Cousin, L., Marino, V. R., Elias, M. N., Paterson, C. L., Pleasant, M. L., et al. (2018) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4491 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Mikolasek, M., Berg, J., Witt, C. M., & Barth, J. (2018) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-017-9679-7 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Urech, C., Grossert, A., Alder, J., Scherer, S., Handschin, B., Kasenda, B., Borislavova, B., Degen, S., Erb, J., Faessler, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.74.8491 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
“In a randomized, wait-list controlled trial, breast cancer survivors (on average, 3 years after initial diagnosis) who participated in an online program in a similar therapist-guided format as presented here reported significantly improved sexual functioning (the primary end point of the trial) as compared with the wa…”
BackgroundBeatty, L., Koczwara, B., & Wade, T. (2016) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-015-2867-6 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Børøsund, E., Mirkovic, J., Clark, M. M., Ehlers, S. L., Andrykowski, M. A., Bergland, A., Westeng, M., & Solberg Nes, L. (2018) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/formative.9954 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“Examples of promising findings include improved self-efficacy for coping with cancer through the use of a Web-based stress management workbook for breast cancer patients [27], improved QoL and physical activity for breast cancer survivors through use of a Web-based portal [28], and improved QoL and reduced distress fo…”
BackgroundWillems, R. A., Mesters, I., Lechner, L., Kanera, I. M., & Bolman, C. A. W. (2017) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-017-0625-0 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Lee, K., Kim, S., Kim, S. H., Yoo, S., Sung, J. H., Oh, E. G., Kim, N. W., & Lee, J. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/38333 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Syrjala, K. L., Yi, J. C., Artherholt, S. B., Romano, J. M., Crouch, M.-L., Fiscalini, A. S., Hegel, M. T., Flowers, M. E. D., Martin, P. J., & Leisenring, W. M. (2018) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-018-0693-9 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Durosini, I., Triberti, S., Savioni, L., Sebri, V., & Pravettoni, G. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191912704 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“, 2014 [56] - Cancer Behavior Inventory v2.”
BackgroundContributors and Inhibitors of Resilience Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer
Rosenberg, A. R., Yi-Frazier, J. P., Wharton, C., Gordon, K., & Jones, B. (2014) · Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology · doi:10.1089/jayao.2014.0033 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Knaevelsrud, C., Böttche, M., Pietrzak, R. H., Freyberger, H. J., & Kuwert, P. (2017) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2017.02.024 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Barrett, K., & Stewart, I. (2021) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.13074 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Simblett, S. K., Birch, J., Matcham, F., Yágüez, L., & Morris, R. G. (2017) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.5558 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Beatty, L., Kemp, E., Butow, P., Girgis, A., Schofield, P., Turner, J., Hulbert‐Williams, N. J., Levesque, J. V., & Koczwara, B. (2018) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4445 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Web based survivorship interventions for women with breast cancer: An integrative review
Post, K. E., & Flanagan, J. (2016) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2016.10.004 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Psychosocial interventions in breast cancer survivorship care
Gudenkauf, L. M., & Ehlers, S. L. (2018) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2017.11.005 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Ham, K., Chin, S., Suh, Y. J., Rhee, M., Yu, E.-S., Lee, H. J., Kim, J.-H., Kim, S. W., Koh, S.-J., & Chung, K.-M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01592 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-efficacy for coping with cancer: Revision of the Cancer Behavior Inventory (Version 3.0).
Merluzzi, T. V., Philip, E. J., Heitzmann, C. A., Liu, H., Yang, M., & Conley, C. C. (2017) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000483 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Bradbury, K., Steele, M., Corbett, T., Geraghty, A. W. A., Krusche, A., Heber, E., Easton, S., Cheetham-Blake, T., Slodkowska-Barabasz, J., Müller, A. M., et al. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0163-4 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
van den Berg, S. W., Peters, E. J., Kraaijeveld, J. F., Gielissen, M. F., & Prins, J. B. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2566 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Ugalde, A., Haynes, K., Boltong, A., White, V., Krishnasamy, M., Schofield, P., Aranda, S., & Livingston, P. (2017) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.009 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
The 2014–2018 Oncology Nursing Society Research Agenda
Knobf, M. T., Cooley, M. E., Duffy, S. A., Doorenbos, A. Z., Eaton, L. H., Given, B. A., Mayer, D. K., McCorkle, R. C., Miaskowski, C. A., Mitchell, S. A., et al. (2015) · Oncology nursing forum · doi:10.1188/15.onf.450-465 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Stress Management for Breast Cancer Patients
Tang, M., Liu, X., Wu, Q., & Shi, Y. (2020) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/ncc.0000000000000804 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Beatty, L., Kemp, E., Binnion, C., Turner, J., Milne, D., Butow, P., Lambert, S., Yates, P., Yip, D., & Koczwara, B. (2017) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3591-1 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Psychosocial interventions for cancer survivors: a meta-analysis of effects on positive affect
Salsman, J. M., Pustejovsky, J. E., Schueller, S. M., Hernandez, R., Berendsen, M., McLouth, L. E. S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2019) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-019-00811-8 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Beatty, L., Kemp, E., Coll, J. R., Turner, J., Butow, P. N., Milne, D., Yates, P. M., Lambert, S., Wootten, A. C., Yip, D., et al. (2018) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4526-1 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Flannery, M. A., Zhang, Z., Underhill-Blazey, M. L., Bobry, M. D., Leblanc, N. M., Rodriguez, D., & Zhang, C. (2024) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/46116 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Tng, G. Y. Q., Koh, J., Soh, X. C., Majeed, N. M., & Hartanto, A. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.074 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Mendes-Santos, C., Weiderpass, E., Santana, R., & Andersson, G. (2019) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2019.01.004 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Wootten, A. C., Abbott, J.-A. M., Chisholm, K., Austin, D. W., Klein, B., McCabe, M., Murphy, D. G., & Costello, A. J. (2014) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2014.10.001 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Miller, S. M., Hudson, S. V., Hui, S. A., Diefenbach, M. A., Fleisher, L. G., Raivitch, S., Belton, T. D., Roy, G., Njoku, A. U., Scarpato, J., et al. (2015) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-015-0431-5 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Gäebel, W., Großimlinghaus, I., Mucić, D., Maercker, A. R. A., Zielasek, J., & Kerst, A. (2017) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.001 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Beatty, L., Binnion, C., Kemp, E., & Koczwara, B. (2017) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3663-2 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Anxiety and depression in women with breast cancer
Beatty, L., & Kissane, D. W. (2017) · Cancer Forum · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Bamgboje‐Ayodele, A., Smith, A. B., Short, C. E., Fardell, J. E., Shaw, J., Beatty, L., Higgins, K. S., Tutelman, P. R., Chambers, C. T., & Girgis, A. (2021) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.012 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
on behalf of the Finding My Way study investigators, Beatty, L., Kemp, E., Wade, T., & Koczwara, B. (2015) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1322-x · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Ma, Z., Shi, Y., Yao, S., Lu, N., & Cheng, F. (2023) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-023-08052-3 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Ajmera, P., Miraj, M., Kalra, S., Goyal, R. K., Chorsiya, V., Shaik, R. A., Alzhrani, M., Alanazi, A., Alqahtani, M., Miraj, S. A., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.1017343 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Lally, R. M., Eisenhauer, C. M., Buckland, S., & Kupzyk, K. A. (2018) · Oncology nursing forum · doi:10.1188/18.onf.e111-e124 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Rissanen, R., Nordin, K., Ahlgren, J., & Arving, C. (2015) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3763 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Learning Outcomes in a Stress Management Course: Online versus Face-to-Face
Fish, K., & Kang, H. G. (2014) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Digital Interventions for PTSD Symptoms in the General Population: a Review
Stefanopoulou, E., Lewis, D., Mughal, A., & Larkin, J. (2020) · Psychiatric Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11126-020-09745-2 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Flanagan, J. M., Post, K. E., Hill, R. R., & Winters, L. N. (2021) · Holistic Nursing Practice · doi:10.1097/hnp.0000000000000465 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Internet use and preferences among women living with advanced breast cancer
Kemp, E., Koczwara, B., Turner, J., Girgis, A., Schofield, P. E., Hulbert-Williams, N., Levesque, J. V., Spence, D., Vatandoust, S., Kichenadasse, G., et al. (2019) · The Breast Journal · doi:10.1111/tbj.13203 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Nursing strategies to support psychological adaptation in adult cancer patients: a scoping review
Peixoto, T., Peixoto, N. M. D. S. M., Pinto, C., & Santos, C. (2021) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Ochoa, C., Medina, J. C., Flix-Valle, A., & Anastasiadou, D. T. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041548 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Keenan, E., Morris, R. C., Vasiliou, V. S., & Thompson, A. R. (2023) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/13591053231216017 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Akkol-Solakoglu, S., Hevey, D., & Richards, D. (2021) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2021.100367 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Loveys, K., Antoni, M. H., Donkin, L., Sagar, M. A., Xu, W., & Broadbent, E. (2022) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti6110099 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Walsh, E. A., Safren, S. A., Penedo, F. J., & Antoni, M. H. (2023) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102374 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Nursing strategies to support psychological adaptation in adult cancer patients: a scoping review
Peixoto, T., Peixoto, N. M. D. S. M., Pinto, C., & Santos, C. (2021) · Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP · doi:10.1590/s1980-220x2019039203690 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Rissanen, R., Arving, C., Ahlgren, J., Cernvall, M., & Nordin, K. (2013) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3392 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Su, Y., Zhang, S., Duan, L., & Hu, X. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.70089 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Koh, Z. H., Serbetci, D., Skues, J., & Murray, G. (2025) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/59351 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Kane, K., Kennedy, F., Absolom, K. L., Harley, C., & Velikova, G. (2021) · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002820 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Vitale, E., Genovese, V. V., & Allenet, B. (2021) · Education thérapeutique du patient - Therapeutic patient education · doi:10.1051/tpe/2021007 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Walsh, E. A., Popok, P., Ream, M. E., Bainter, S. A., Perdomo, D. M., Taub, C. J., Saez-Flores, E., Kesmodel, S. B., Blomberg, B. B., & Antoni, M. H. (2023) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-023-07939-5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Technology-Based Cancer Survivorship Care Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lim, J., Zhang, A., & Zebrack, B. (2023) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/10497315231199940 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Beatty, L., & Scott, K. M. (2013) · E-Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.7790/ejap.v9i1.349 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Online Psychological Intervention in Breast Cancer Survivors: a Review
Popovic, M. M., Rico, V., DeAngelis, C., Lam, H., & Lim, F. (2022) · Hong Kong Journal of Radiology · doi:10.12809/hkjr2217206 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Effect of Tele-exercise Interventions on Quality of Life in Cancer Patients: A Meta-analysis
Chen, X., Zhu, C., Li, J., Zhou, L., Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., & Hu, X. (2024) · Asian Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.anr.2024.09.005 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Taheri, A., & Falavarjani, M. F. (2019) · Middle East Journal of Positive Psychology · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Arring, N., Reese, J. B., Lafferty, C. K., Barton, D. L., & Carter, J. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/75743 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Psychology, Mental Health, and Quality of Life
Snoek, F. J., Brodar, K. E., Cuddeback, G. S., Fisher, E. B., Golin, C. E., & Sokol, R. L. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-93826-4_32 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Bouriga, R., Mahjoub, M., Chaouch, M. A., Hochlef, M., Kissi, Y. E., & Ahmed, S. B. (2019) · Psycho-Oncologie · doi:10.3166/pson-2019-0093 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
(2019) · Cancer Studies and Therapeutics · doi:10.31038/cst.2019422 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The impact of parental cancer on adolescent and young adult offspring
Morris, J. N. (2018) · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)
Mottaghi, S., Boogar, I. R., Moradi, S., & Sotodehasl, N. (2023) · مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان · doi:10.61186/jrums.22.4.333
Qu, H., Song, B., Yang, L., & Liu, J. (2025) · The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1620/tjem.2025.j030
Rissanen, R. (2014) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
- Authors
- Carpenter, K. M., Stoner, S. A., Schmitz, K., McGregor, B. A., & Doorenbos, A. Z.
- Affiliations
- Alere (United States) (US)
- Talaria (United States) (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Carpenter, Kelly M.
- Venue
- Journal of Behavioral Medicine
- Published
- 2012-12-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 458-468
- ISSN
- 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3521
- PMC
- PMC3622129
- OpenAlex
- W2088223645
- Semantic Scholar
- ea56d9526e0f34560872fedd1dfe7370054e6838
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R43CA106154, R44CA106154)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- breast cancer, stress management, cognitive-behavioral intervention, online intervention, workbook, breast cancer survivors, coping self-efficacy, negative mood regulation, posttraumatic stress symptoms
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Manuals as Topic, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Survivors, Self Efficacy, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review