The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Walking Distance by Trip Purpose and Population Subgroups
Open accessAbstract
Background Walking distance is an important concept in the fields of transportation and public health. A distance of 0.25 miles is often used as an acceptable walking distance in U.S. research studies. Overall, research on the distance and duration of walking trips for different purposes and across different population groups remains limited. Purpose This study examines the prevalence of walking and distances and durations of walking trips for different purposes among U.S. residents. Methods The distances and durations of walking trips for different purposes across population groups were compared using nationally representative data from the 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS). Distance decay functions were used to summarize the distribution of walking distances and durations for different purposes and population subgroups. Data were analyzed in 2011. Results Sixteen percent of respondents had at least one daily walking trip. The mean and median values for walking distance were 0.7 and 0.5 miles, respectively. For walking duration, the mean and median values were 14.9 and 10 minutes. About 65% of walking trips were more than 0.25 miles, and about 18% of walking trips were more than 1 mile. Large variations were found among various purposes for both distance and duration. The distances and durations of walking for recreation were substantially longer than those for other purposes. People with lower versus higher household income walked longer distances for work but shorter distances for recreation. Conclusions Only a small fraction of respondents walk, but trips longer than 0.25 miles are common. There is substantial variability in the distance and duration of walking trips by purpose and population subgroups. These differences have implications for developing strategies to increase physical activity through walking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models
LIANG, K.-Y., & ZEGER, S. L. (1986) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 · Cited by 18,550
Built Environment Correlates of Walking: A Review
SAELENS, B. E., & HANDY, S. L. (2008) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31817c67a4 · Cited by 1,912
Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults
Hoehner, C. M., Brennan Ramirez, L. K., Elliott, M. B., Handy, S. L., & Brownson, R. C. (2005) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.023 · Cited by 911
Spatial Interaction Models:Formulations and Applications
Fotheringham, A. S., & O’Kelly, M. E. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 731
Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.9.1583 · Cited by 606
Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity
Pikora, T. J., Bull, F. C. L., Jamrozik, K., Knuiman, M., Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2002) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00498-1 · Cited by 500
Operational Definitions of Walkable Neighborhood: Theoretical and Empirical Insights
Moudon, A. V., Lee, C., Cheadle, A. D., Garvin, C., Johnson, D., Schmid, T. L., Weathers, R. D., & Lin, L. (2006) · Journal of Physical Activity and Health · doi:10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s99 · Cited by 443
The Relation between Neighborhood Built Environment and Walking Activity among Older Adults
Nagel, C. L., Carlson, N. E., Bosworth, M., & Michael, Y. L. (2008) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwn158 · Cited by 363
SPATIAL STRUCTURE AND DISTANCE‐DECAY PARAMETERS
FOTHERINGHAM, A. S. (1981) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1981.tb01367.x · Cited by 349
The relationship between destination proximity, destination mix and physical activity behaviors
McCormack, G. R., Giles-Corti, B., & Bulsara, M. (2008) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.01.013 · Cited by 349
Cited by
Rigolon, A., Browning, M. H. E. M., McAnirlin, O., & Yoon, H. (. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18052563 · Cited by 557
Paracchini, M. L., Zulian, G., Kopperoinen, L., Maes, J., Schägner, J. P., Termansen, M., Zandersen, M., Perez-Soba, M., Scholefield, P. A., & Bidoglio, G. (2014) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018 · Cited by 485
Neighbourhood parks and reduction in stress among adolescents: Results from Buffalo, New York
Feda, D. M., Seelbinder, A., Baek, S., Raja, S., Yin, L., & Roemmich, J. N. (2015) · Indoor and Built Environment · doi:10.1177/1420326x14535791 · Cited by 78
Kharel, S., Sharifiasl, S., & Pan, Q. (2025) · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/03611981241254382 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Y., & Diez-Roux, A. V.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-19
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043614425
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 29.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Walking Distance by Trip Purpose and Population Subgroups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.03.015
- The paper
- Yang, Y., & Diez-Roux, A. V. (2012). Walking Distance by Trip Purpose and Population Subgroups. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.03.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.