Cited by 102Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyObesity, Physical Activity, DietConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Food companies' calorie-reduction pledges to improve U.S. diet

Open access
Slining, Meghan M., Ng, Shu Wen, Popkin, Barry M.·2013·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Heretofore, corporate voluntary pledges to improve the health of Americans have been linked neither to explicit measurable commitments nor to a framework for an independent evaluation. The Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation (HWCF), whose members include 16 of the nation's leading consumer packaged goods food and beverage manufacturers, voluntarily pledged to collectively remove 1 trillion calories from their products by 2012 (against a 2007 baseline), and 1.5 trillion calories by 2015. The pledge is designed to reduce the calorie gap commensurate with the HWCF companies' role in the U.S. diet. To date, no system exists for documenting the nutritional and public health impacts of industry-led changes in the food supply on individual diets. The current study represents a unique opportunity to understand how the consumer packaged goods food and beverage sector is changing and how these changes are associated with changes in the American diet. It presents data on national caloric sales from this sector, purchases of these goods by various subpopulations, and methods linking these to individual intakes of Americans. Findings show that HWCF companies accounted for approximately 25% of calories consumed in the U.S. in 2007 and that the 1.5 trillion-calorie pledge (about 14 calories/day/capita) accounts for 0.8% of the calories sold across all consumer packaged goods food and beverage brands in 2007. The authors hope that this evaluation will continue to create models and methods for demonstrating the effects of changes in the food supply on individual diets, particularly among those from vulnerable subpopulations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.064

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 102

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation Food and Beverage Manufacturers Pledging to Reduce Annual Calories By 1.5 Trillion By 2015 Press Release 2010; May 17, 2010. www.healthyweightcommit.org/news/Reduce_Annual_Calories/

Authors
Slining, M. M., Ng, S. W., & Popkin, B. M.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Popkin, Barry M.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
174-184
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994300074
Cited by
102
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19
FWCI
36.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
RWJF for the Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation Evaluation project (67506, 68793)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
food and beverage industry, fast-moving consumer goods, dietary intake, vulnerable subpopulations
MeSH terms
Beverages, Energy Intake, Diet, Food, Food Supply, Humans, Public Health, Food Packaging, Food Industry, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review