Long-lasting Permethrin Impregnated Uniforms
Open accessAbstract
Background Because of frequent exposure to tick habitats, outdoor workers are at high risk for tick-borne diseases. Adherence to National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-recommended tick bite prevention methods is poor. A factory-based method for permethrin impregnation of clothing that provides long-lasting insecticidal and repellent activity is commercially available, and studies are needed to assess the long-term effectiveness of this clothing under field conditions. Purpose To evaluate the protective effectiveness of long-lasting permethrin impregnated uniforms among a cohort of North Carolina outdoor workers. Design, setting, and participants A double-blind RCT was conducted between March 2011 and September 2012. Subjects included outdoor workers from North Carolina State Divisions of Forestry, Parks and Recreation, and Wildlife who worked in eastern or central North Carolina. A total of 159 volunteer subjects were randomized, and 127 and 101 subjects completed the first and second years of follow-up, respectively. Intervention Uniforms of participants in the treatment group were factory-impregnated with long-lasting permethrin whereas control group uniforms received a sham treatment. Participants continued to engage in their usual tick bite prevention activities. Main outcome measures Incidence of work-related tick bites reported on weekly tick bite logs. Results Study subjects reported 1,045 work-related tick bites over 5,251 person-weeks of follow-up. The mean number of reported tick bites in the year prior to enrollment was similar for both the treatment and control groups, but markedly different during the study period. In our analysis conducted in 2013, the effectiveness of long-lasting permethrin impregnated uniforms for the prevention of work-related tick bites was 0.82 (95% CI=0.66, 0.91) and 0.34 (95% CI=-0.67, 0.74) for the first and second years of follow-up. Conclusions These results indicate that long-lasting permethrin impregnated uniforms are highly effective for at least 1 year in deterring tick bites in the context of typical tick bite prevention measures employed by outdoor workers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another laboratory study showed a similar reduction in landing and blood feeding behavior with permethrin-treated clothing compared to untreated clothing using slightly different methods.
“Another laboratory study showed a similar reduction in landing and blood feeding behavior with permethrin-treated clothing compared to untreated clothing using slightly different methods.[45,51]”
From Pyrethroid insecticides maintain repellent effect on knock-down resistant populations of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes (2018) · cites this paper as [51]
The efficacy of permethrin-treated clothing against mosquitoes has been demonstrated in many laboratory studies and short-duration field trials.
“The efficacy of permethrin-treated clothing against mosquitoes has been demonstrated in many laboratory studies and short-duration field trials.[4,6,7,44,45,47–60]”
From Pyrethroid insecticides maintain repellent effect on knock-down resistant populations of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes (2018) · cites this paper as [51]
Cites
Schreck, C. E., Mount, G. A., & Carlson, D. A. (1982) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/75.6.1059 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bowman, N. M., Akialis, K., Cave, G., Barrera, R., Apperson, C. S., & Meshnick, S. R. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196410 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationKittayapong, P., Olanratmanee, P., Maskhao, P., Byass, P., Logan, J., Tozan, Y., Louis, V., Gubler, D. J., & Wilder-Smith, A. (2017) · PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005197 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Long-Lasting Permethrin-Impregnated Clothing Protects Against Mosquito Bites in Outdoor Workers
Londono-Renteria, B., Patel, J. C., Vaughn, M., Funkhauser, S., Ponnusamy, L., Grippin, C., Jameson, S. B., Apperson, C., Mores, C. N., Wesson, D. M., et al. (2015) · The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.15-0130 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Vaughn, M. F., Funkhouser, S. W., Lin, F.-C., Fine, J., Juliano, J. J., Apperson, C. S., & Meshnick, S. R.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vaughn, Meagan F.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 473-480
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034074698
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- U.S. Forest Service
- North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
- Keywords
- permethrin, tick bite prevention, tick-borne diseases, outdoor workers, occupational exposure
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Insecticides, Male, Middle Aged, North Carolina, Protective Clothing, Incidence, Tick-Borne Diseases, Permethrin, Tick Bites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review