Cited by 62Vector-borne infectious diseasesInsect Pest Control StrategiesDermatological diseases and infestations

Long-lasting Permethrin Impregnated Uniforms

Open access
Vaughn, Meagan F., Funkhouser, Sheana Whelan, Lin, Feng-Chang, Fine, Jason, Juliano, Jonathan J., Apperson, Charles S., Meshnick, Steven R.·2014·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Because of frequent exposure to tick habitats, outdoor workers are at high risk for tick-borne diseases. Adherence to National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-recommended tick bite prevention methods is poor. A factory-based method for permethrin impregnation of clothing that provides long-lasting insecticidal and repellent activity is commercially available, and studies are needed to assess the long-term effectiveness of this clothing under field conditions. Purpose To evaluate the protective effectiveness of long-lasting permethrin impregnated uniforms among a cohort of North Carolina outdoor workers. Design, setting, and participants A double-blind RCT was conducted between March 2011 and September 2012. Subjects included outdoor workers from North Carolina State Divisions of Forestry, Parks and Recreation, and Wildlife who worked in eastern or central North Carolina. A total of 159 volunteer subjects were randomized, and 127 and 101 subjects completed the first and second years of follow-up, respectively. Intervention Uniforms of participants in the treatment group were factory-impregnated with long-lasting permethrin whereas control group uniforms received a sham treatment. Participants continued to engage in their usual tick bite prevention activities. Main outcome measures Incidence of work-related tick bites reported on weekly tick bite logs. Results Study subjects reported 1,045 work-related tick bites over 5,251 person-weeks of follow-up. The mean number of reported tick bites in the year prior to enrollment was similar for both the treatment and control groups, but markedly different during the study period. In our analysis conducted in 2013, the effectiveness of long-lasting permethrin impregnated uniforms for the prevention of work-related tick bites was 0.82 (95% CI=0.66, 0.91) and 0.34 (95% CI=-0.67, 0.74) for the first and second years of follow-up. Conclusions These results indicate that long-lasting permethrin impregnated uniforms are highly effective for at least 1 year in deterring tick bites in the context of typical tick bite prevention measures employed by outdoor workers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaughn, M. F., Funkhouser, S. W., Lin, F.-C., Fine, J., Juliano, J. J., Apperson, C. S., & Meshnick, S. R.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Vaughn, Meagan F.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
473-480
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034074698
Cited by
62
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • U.S. Forest Service
  • North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
Keywords
permethrin, tick bite prevention, tick-borne diseases, outdoor workers, occupational exposure
MeSH terms
Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Insecticides, Male, Middle Aged, North Carolina, Protective Clothing, Incidence, Tick-Borne Diseases, Permethrin, Tick Bites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review