CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 329Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesGun Ownership and Violence ResearchHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reducing a Suicidal Person’s Access to Lethal Means of Suicide

Open access
Barber, Catherine W., Miller, Matthew J.·2014·American Journal of Preventive Medicine
DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.028
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Reducing the availability of highly lethal and commonly used suicide methods has been associated with declines in suicide rates of as much as 30%-50% in other countries. The theory and evidence underlying means restriction is outlined. Most evidence of its efficacy comes from population-level interventions and natural experiments. In the U.S., where 51% of suicides are completed with firearms and household firearm ownership is common and likely to remain so, reducing a suicidal person's access to firearms will usually be accomplished not by fiat or other legislative initiative but rather by appealing to individual decision, for example, by counseling at-risk people and their families to temporarily store household firearms away from home or otherwise making household firearms inaccessible to the at-risk person until they have recovered. Providers, gatekeepers, and gun owner groups are important partners in this work. Research is needed in a number of areas: communications research to identify effective messages and messengers for "lethal means counseling," clinical trials to identify effective interventions, translational research to ensure broad uptake of these interventions across clinical and community settings, and foundational research to better understand method choice and substitution. Approaches to suicide methods other than firearms are discussed. Means restriction is one of the few empirically based strategies to substantially reduce the number of suicide deaths.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.028

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vyrostek, 2004, Surveillance for fatal and nonfatal injuries–U.S., 2001, MMWR Surveill Summ, 53, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 329

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Barber, C. W., & Miller, M. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Barber, Catherine W.
ORCID
Barber, Catherine W.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
S264-S272
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.028
OpenAlex
W2121004493
Cited by
329
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1
FWCI
22.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicide prevention, means restriction, firearm access, household firearms, suicide methods, gatekeepers, at-risk individuals, suicide rates
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Clinical Trials as Topic, Firearms, Humans, Ownership, Research, Risk Factors, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, United States, Information Dissemination, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review