Cited by 55Sodium Intake and HealthBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNutritional Studies and Diet

A Dietary Intervention in Urban African Americans

Open access
Miller, Edgar R., Cooper, Lisa A., Carson, Kathryn A., Wang, Nae-Yuh, Appel, Lawrence J., Gayles, Debra, Charleston, Jeanne, White, Karen +11 more·2016·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Introduction Unhealthy diets, often low in potassium, likely contribute to racial disparities in blood pressure. We tested the effectiveness of providing weekly dietary advice, assistance with selection of higher potassium grocery items, and a $30 per week food allowance on blood pressure and other outcomes in African American adults with hypertension.Design We conducted an 8-week RCT with two parallel arms between May 2012 and November 2013.Setting/participants We randomized 123 African Americans with controlled hypertension from an urban primary care clinic in Baltimore, Maryland, and implemented the trial in partnership with a community supermarket and the Baltimore City Health Department. Mean (SD) age was 58.6 (9.5) years; 71% were female; blood pressure was 131.3 (14.7)/77.2 (10.5) mmHg; BMI was 34.5 (8.2); and 28% had diabetes.Intervention Participants randomized to the active intervention group (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension [DASH]-Plus) received coach-directed dietary advice and assistance with weekly online ordering and purchasing of high-potassium foods ($30/week) delivered by a community supermarket to a neighborhood library. Participants in the control group received a printed DASH diet brochure along with a debit account of equivalent value to that of the DASH-Plus group.Main outcome measures The primary outcome was blood pressure change. Analyses were conducted in January to October 2014.Results Compared with the control group, the DASH-Plus group increased self-reported consumption of fruits and vegetables (mean=1.4, 95% CI=0.7, 2.1 servings/day); estimated intake of potassium (mean=0.4, 95% CI=0.1, 0.7 grams/day); and urine potassium excretion (mean=19%, 95% CI=1%, 38%). There was no significant effect on blood pressure.Conclusions A program providing dietary advice, assistance with grocery ordering, and $30/week of high-potassium foods in African American patients with controlled hypertension in a community-based clinic did not reduce BP. However, the intervention increased consumption of fruits, vegetables, and urinary excretion of potassium.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.06.010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in low- and middle-income countries suggest conditional cash transfers may raise preventive care use and improve nutrition, health behaviors, and birth outcomes.

    “While less studied in high-income countries, research in low- and middle-income countries suggests that conditional cash transfers may be effective in increasing preventive health care utilization and improving nutrition, health behaviors, and birth outcomes, as well.(43)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 55

Authors
Miller, E. R., Cooper, L. A., Carson, K. A., Wang, N.-Y., Appel, L. J., Gayles, D., Charleston, J., White, K., You, N., Weng, Y., Martin-Daniels, M., Bates-Hopkins, B., Robb, I., Franz, W. K., Brown, E. L., Halbert, J. P., Albert, M. C., Dalcin, A. T., & Yeh, H.-C.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Miller, Edgar R.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
87-95
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1125052666
Cited by
55
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001079)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P50HL105187, P50-HL0105187)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
hypertension, African Americans, DASH diet, potassium intake, dietary intervention, food aid, blood pressure, racial disparities, fruits and vegetables, potassium excretion, community-based intervention, urban primary care
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Blood Pressure, Diet, Female, Fruit, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Nuts, Urban Population, Vegetables, Baltimore, Health Status Disparities, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review