The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The March Toward Malaria Vaccines
Open accessAbstract
In 2013 there were an estimated 584,000 deaths and 198 million clinical illnesses due to malaria, the majority in sub-Saharan Africa. Vaccines would be the ideal addition to the existing armamentarium of anti-malaria tools. However, malaria is caused by parasites, and parasites are much more complex in terms of their biology than the viruses and bacteria for which we have vaccines, passing through multiple stages of development in the human host, each stage expressing hundreds of unique antigens. This complexity makes it more difficult to develop a vaccine for parasites than for viruses and bacteria, since an immune response targeting one stage may not offer protection against a later stage, because different antigens are the targets of protective immunity at different stages. Furthermore, depending on the life cycle stage and whether the parasite is extra- or intra-cellular, antibody and/or cellular immune responses provide protection. It is thus not surprising that there is no vaccine on the market for prevention of malaria, or any human parasitic infection. In fact, no vaccine for any disease with this breadth of targets and immune responses exists. In this limited review, we focus on four approaches to malaria vaccines, (1) a recombinant protein with adjuvant vaccine aimed at Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) pre-erythrocytic stages of the parasite cycle (RTS,S/AS01), (2) whole sporozoite vaccines aimed at Pf pre-erythrocytic stages (PfSPZ Vaccine and PfSPZ-CVac), (3) prime boost vaccines that include recombinant DNA, viruses and bacteria, and protein with adjuvant aimed primarily at Pf pre-erythrocytic, but also asexual erythrocytic stages, and (4) recombinant protein with adjuvant vaccines aimed at Pf and Plasmodium vivax sexual erythrocytic and mosquito stages. We recognize that we are not covering all approaches to malaria vaccine development, or most of the critically important work on development of vaccines against P. vivax, the second most important cause of malaria. Progress during the last few years has been significant, and a first generation malaria candidate vaccine, RTS,S/AS01, is under review by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for its quality, safety and efficacy under article 58, which allows the EMA to give a scientific opinion about products intended exclusively for markets outside of the European Union. However, much work is in progress to optimize malaria vaccines in regard to magnitude and durability of protective efficacy and the financing and practicality of delivery. Thus, we are hopeful that anti-malaria vaccines will soon be important tools in the battle against malaria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
First Results of Phase 3 Trial of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Children
The RTS, S. C. T. P. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1102287 · Cited by 896
Stoute, J. A., Slaoui, M., Heppner, D. G., Momin, P., Kester, K. E., Desmons, P., Wellde, B. T., Garçon, N., Krzych, U., Marchand, M., et al. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199701093360202 · Cited by 870
A Phase 3 Trial of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Infants
The RTS, S. C. T. P. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1208394 · Cited by 752
Cited by
Protection against malaria at 1 year and immune correlates following PfSPZ vaccination
Ishizuka, A. S., Lyke, K. E., DeZure, A., Berry, A. A., Richie, T. L., Mendoza, F. H., Enama, M. E., Gordon, I. J., Chang, L.-J., Sarwar, U. N., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4110 · Cited by 367
Self-citationmRNA-based therapeutics: looking beyond COVID-19 vaccines
Parhiz, H., Atochina-Vasserman, E. N., & Weissman, D. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02444-3 · Cited by 279
T cell-mediated immunity to malaria
Kurup, S. P., Butler, N. S., & Harty, J. T. (2019) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0158-z · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffman, S. L., Vekemans, J., Richie, T. L., & Duffy, P. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- S319-S333
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2181213627
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 28.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The March Toward Malaria Vaccines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.011
- The paper
- Hoffman, S. L., Vekemans, J., Richie, T. L., & Duffy, P. E. (2015). The March Toward Malaria Vaccines. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.