Cited by 41Cardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsHealth and Lifestyle StudiesHealth disparities and outcomes

A comparison of black and white racial differences in health lifestyles and cardiovascular disease

Open access
Cockerham, William C., Bauldry, Shawn, Hamby, Bryant W., Shikany, James M., Bae, Sejong·2017·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Introduction This study examines the health lifestyles of a cohort of blacks and whites in relation to cardiovascular disease (CVD). The link between health lifestyles and CVD is well established, but most of the focus has been on SES and more research is needed on racial differences.Methods Data were from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study of black (n=2,451) and white (n=2,351) men and women. Data were analyzed from baseline examinations in 1985-1986 when the participants were aged 18-30 years and any fatal or nonfatal CVD event that occurred over approximately the next 28 years (until August 2013). The first stage of the analysis used latent class models to identify distinct health lifestyles on the basis of race. The second stage used multinomial logit regression models to analyze specific characteristics in relation to the health lifestyles classes, followed by the third stage in which Cox proportional hazards models analyzed associations of the lifestyle classes with CVD risk.Results Four separate health lifestyle patterns for blacks and four for whites were identified, with the "unhealthy" lifestyle among blacks (hazard ratio, 1.60) and "most unhealthy" lifestyle among whites (hazard ratio, 3.12) showing an elevated risk of CVD. An important difference is that, in every lifestyle class, blacks showed a higher probability of excessive energy intake than whites-indicative of the potential for obesity.Conclusions Health lifestyles differ by race and support the exploratory hypothesis that distinct classes of healthy-unhealthy lifestyles exist within each racial group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.019

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recently, researchers have begun to tie theoretical literature on health lifestyles to empirical examinations of clusters of a wide range of behaviors.

    “Recently, researchers have begun to tie the theoretical literature on health lifestyles to empirical examinations of clusters of a wide range of behaviors (Cockerham et al., 2017; Mize, 2017; Mollborn et al., 2014; Saint Onge and Krueger, 2017; Skalamera and Hummer, 2016).”

    From Health lifestyles across the transition to adulthood: implications for health (2017) · cites this paper as Cockerham et al., 2017

  • This nascent literature suggests that U.S. children, adolescents, and adults exhibit coherent patterns of behavior consistent with health lifestyles.

    “This nascent literature suggests that U.S. children, adolescents, and adults exhibit coherent patterns of behavior, consistent with their conceptualization as health lifestyles.”

    From Health lifestyles across the transition to adulthood: implications for health (2017) · cites this paper as Cockerham et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cockerham, W. C., Bauldry, S., Hamby, B. W., Shikany, J. M., & Bae, S.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Cockerham, William C.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
S56-S62
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2565508450
Cited by
41
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHSN268201300028C, HHS-N2-68201300029C, HHSN268201300027C, HHSN268200900041C, HHSN268201300026C, HHS-N2-68201300025C)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK079626)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD008176)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
racial differences, health lifestyle, cardiovascular disease, Black and White comparison, lifestyle patterns, obesity, young adults, Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Healthy Lifestyle, Health Risk Behaviors, Adult, Black or African American, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, White People, Racial Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review