Assessing Area-Level Deprivation as a Proxy for Individual-Level Social Risks
Abstract
Introduction Concerns about the opportunity costs of social screening initiatives have led some healthcare organizations to consider using social deprivation indices (area-level social risks) as proxies for self-reported needs (individual-level social risks). Yet, little is known about the effectiveness of such substitutions across different populations. Methods This analysis explores how well the highest quartile (cold spot) of three different area-level social risk measures-the Social Deprivation Index, Area Deprivation Index, and Neighborhood Stress Score-corresponds with six individual-level social risks and three risk combinations among a national sample of Medicare Advantage members (N=77,503). Data were derived from area-level measures and cross-sectional survey data collected between October 2019 and February 2020. Agreement between individual and individual-level social risks, sensitivity values, specificity values, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values was calculated for all measures in summer/fall 2022. Results Agreement between area and individual-level social risks ranged from 53% to 77%. Sensitivity for each risk and risk category never exceeded 42%; specificity values ranged from 62% to 87%. Positive predictive values ranged from 8% to 70%, and negative predictive values ranged from 48% to 93%. There were modest performance discrepancies across area-level measures. Conclusions These findings provide additional evidence that area-level depri…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing research has explored integrating patient SDoH data with geospatial datasets like census demographics and social vulnerability index (SVI) to estimate SDoH factors at a community or neighborhood level.
“Existing research has also explored integrating patient SDoH data with geospatial datasets like census demographics and social vulnerability index (SVI) to estimate SDoH factors at a community or neighborhood level41–44.”
From Social determinants of health extraction from clinical notes across institutions using large language models (2025) · cites this paper as [44]
Other work has explored mapping SDoH documentation and area-level deprivation to assess individual-level social risks.
“Other work has explored mapping SDoH documentation and area-level deprivation to assess individual-level social risks44.”
From Social determinants of health extraction from clinical notes across institutions using large language models (2025) · cites this paper as [44]
Cites
Making Neighborhood-Disadvantage Metrics Accessible — The Neighborhood Atlas
Kind, A. J. H., & Buckingham, W. R. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1802313 · Cited by 3,310 · see citing works
Social determinants of health and diabetes: A scientific review
Hill-Briggs, F., Adler, N. E., Berkowitz, S. A., Chin, M. H., Gary-Webb, T. L., Navas-Acien, A., Thornton, P. L., & Haire-Joshu, D. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci20-0053 · Cited by 1,732 · see citing works
Butler, D. C., Petterson, S., Phillips, R. L., & Bazemore, A. W. (2013) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01449.x · Cited by 689 · see citing works
Cottrell, E. K., Hendricks, M., Dambrun, K., Cowburn, S., Pantell, M., Gold, R., & Gottlieb, L. M. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16852 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Keloth, V. K., Selek, S., Chen, Q., Gilman, C., Fu, S., Dang, Y., Chen, X., Hu, X., Zhou, Y., He, H., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01645-8 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“Existingresearch hasalsoexplored integrating patientSDoHdata with geospatial datasets like census demographics and social vulnerability index (SVI) to estimate SDoH factors at a community or neighborhood level 41 – 44 .”
- Authors
- Brown, E. M., Franklin, S. M., Ryan, J. L., Canterberry, M., Bowe, A., Pantell, M. S., Cottrell, E. K., & Gottlieb, L. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Humana (United States) (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Erika M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1163-1171
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4380151643
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 13.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Kaiser Permanente (20210883)
- National Institutes of Health (L40HD106442)
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (77959)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Keywords
- social risk screening, social deprivation index, Area Deprivation Index, proxy validity, social determinants of health
- MeSH terms
- Social Deprivation, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Health Facilities, Medicare, Humans, Risk-Taking, United States, Policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review