Cited by 63Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications

Relation of morbid obesity and female gender to risk of procedural complications in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation

Open access
Shoemaker, M. Benjamin, Muhammad, Raafia, Farrell, Maureen, Parvez, Babar, White, Brenda W., Streur, Megan, Stubblefield, Tanya, Rytlewski, Jason +7 more·2013·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Obese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently treated with AF ablation. We sought to examine whether a body mass index (BMI) threshold exists beyond which the odds of experiencing a complication from AF ablation increases. All patients enrolled in the Vanderbilt AF Registry who underwent catheter-based AF ablation from May 1999 to February 2012 were included. Major complications were recorded. Morbid obesity was defined as a BMI >40 kg/m(2) and examined in multivariable analysis. A total of 35 complications (6.8%) occurred in 512 ablations. Morbidly obese patients experienced a greater rate of complications (6 of 42, 14.3%) than the nonmorbidly obese (29 of 470, 6.2%; p = 0.046). Using a discrete BMI cutoff, the odds of complications increased 3.1-fold in those with morbid obesity (odds ratio [OR] 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 8.4, p = 0.03) and 2.1-fold for female gender (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.38, p = 0.04). With BMI as a continuous variable, the odds of complications increased by 5% per 1 unit increase in BMI (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.11, p = 0.05), and the increase for female gender was 2.2-fold (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.6, p = 0.03). In conclusion, morbid obesity represents a BMI threshold above which the odds of complications with AF ablation increase significantly. The increase in complications appears to be driven primarily by events in women, suggesting that morbidly obese women are a special population when considering AF ablation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.10.013

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shoemaker, M. B., Muhammad, R., Farrell, M., Parvez, B., White, B. W., Streur, M., Stubblefield, T., Rytlewski, J., Parvathaneni, S., Nagarakanti, R., Roden, D. M., Saavedra, P., Ellis, C., Whalen, S. P., & Darbar, D.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Darbar, Dawood
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
111
Issue
3
Pages
368-373
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073835735
Cited by
63
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • American Heart Association (UL1 RR024975, U19 HL65962, HL092217, UL1 TR000445, 11CRP7420009)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Keywords
morbid obesity, atrial fibrillation ablation, procedural complications, body mass index, female sex, catheter ablation, obesity as risk factor
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Tennessee, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Survival Rate, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review