Cited by 51Renal and Vascular PathologiesPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Prevalence of and Risk Factors of Renal Artery Stenosis in Patients With Resistant Hypertension

Benjamin, Mina M., Fazel, Poorya, Filardo, Giovanni, Choi, James W., Stoler, Robert C.·2014·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a common cause of secondary hypertension. Renal artery angiography is the gold standard for diagnosing RAS. The aim of this study is to report (1) the prevalence of RAS in patients with resistant hypertension and (2) the association of RAS with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and diabetes mellitus (DM). We studied 285 consecutive patients (mean age: 72.5 years) with resistant hypertension (systolic blood pressure >140 mm Hg despite administration of at least 3 antihypertensive drugs) who underwent renal artery angiography at Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital from January 2006 to December 2010. Sixty-nine cases of RAS were identified (incidence: 24.2%). The propensity-adjusted analysis (controlling for clinical and nonclinical risk factors) showed a strong and significant association between RAS and PVD (odds ratio 5.15, 95% confidence interval 2.68 to 9.89, p <0.0001). However, the association between RAS and DM, a previously defined risk factor for RAS, was not significant in this cohort (odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 1.19, p = 0.16). In conclusion, results from this study define the prevalence of RAS in patients with resistant hypertension. Patients with PVD were found to be 5 times more likely to experience RAS than patients without PVD, whereas DM did not confer any increased risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.10.046

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benjamin, M. M., Fazel, P., Filardo, G., Choi, J. W., & Stoler, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University Medical Center (US)
  • Baylor Scott & White Health (US)
  • Texas A&M Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Benjamin, Mina M.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
113
Issue
4
Pages
687-690
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027294421
Cited by
51
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
renal artery stenosis, resistant hypertension, secondary hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, prevalence, risk factors, renal artery angiography, propensity score matching
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Angiography, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Renal Artery Obstruction, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review