Cited by 41Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Meta-analysis on risk of bleeding with apixaban in patients with renal impairment

Pathak, Ranjan, Pandit, Anil, Karmacharya, Paras, Aryal, Madan Raj, Ghimire, Sushil, Poudel, Dilli Ram, Shamoun, Fadi E.·2015·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Apixaban is a novel oral anticoagulant which is approved for the management of atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. There have been concerns regarding bleeding risks with apixaban in patients with renal impairment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of bleeding with apixaban in these patients. Relevant studies were identified through electronic literature searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and clinicaltrials.gov (from inception to February 24, 2014). Phase III randomized controlled trials that compared apixaban with conventional agents (vitamin K antagonist and/or warfarin, low molecular weight heparin, aspirin, and placebo) were included. We defined mild renal impairment as creatinine clearance of 50 to 80 ml/min and moderate to severe renal impairment as creatinine clearance <50 ml/min. Study-specific risk ratios were calculated, and between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) statistics. In 6 trials involving 40,145 patients, the risk of bleeding with apixaban in patients with mild renal impairment was significantly less (risk ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.96, I(2) = 13%) compared with conventional anticoagulants. In patients with moderate to severe renal impairment, the risk of bleeding with was found to be similar (risk ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 2.10, I(2) = 72%). In conclusion, compared with the conventional agents, bleeding risk with apixaban in patients with mild and moderate to severe renal insufficiency is lower and similar, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.10.042

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pathak, R., Pandit, A., Karmacharya, P., Aryal, M. R., Ghimire, S., Poudel, D. R., & Shamoun, F. E.
Affiliations
  • Reading Hospital (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Pandit, Anil
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
115
Issue
3
Pages
323-327
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126783794
Cited by
41
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
apixaban, renal dysfunction, bleeding risk, oral anticoagulants, atrial fibrillation, thromboprophylaxis, creatinine clearance, warfarin, vitamin K antagonists, low molecular weight heparin, aspirin
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Hemorrhage, Humans, Pyrazoles, Pyridones, Risk, Severity of Illness Index, Stroke, Renal Insufficiency, Venous Thromboembolism, Factor Xa Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review