Cited by 136Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHeart rate and cardiovascular healthHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Prognostic Value of Home Heart Rate for Cardiovascular Mortality in the General Population: The Ohasama Study

Hozawa·2004·American Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, the advantages of self-measurement of blood pressure (BP) at home have been recognized. The same advantages could also be applicable to resting heart rate (HR) values assessed at home using a device designed for home BP measurement. However, there have been no studies investigating whether home HR values predict the risk of cardiovascular disease mortality. We therefore investigated the usefulness of HR values in predicting cardiovascular mortality using a device that allowed self-measurement of BP and HR at home. METHODS: The association between the home-measured resting HR and the 10-year risk of cardiovascular mortality was examined in 1780 Japanese individuals >/=40 years of age who had no significant arrhythmias. A Cox proportional hazards model that adjusted for major risk factors was used. RESULTS: An increase of 5 beats/min in the morning home HR measurement was associated with a 17% increase in the risk of cardiovascular mortality (95% confidence interval 5% to 30%). This relationship was also statistically significant after adjustment for home BP values. Even when home-measured systolic BP was within the normal range (<135 mm Hg), subjects with HR >/=70 beats/min had a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality (relative hazard 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.21 to 3.85) than those with normal systolic BP and HR values. CONCLUSIONS: Self-measurement of HR at home, together with self-measurement of BP, is a simple method of providing useful clinical information for assessing cardiovascular risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.06.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large epidemiological studies have found that an increase in 5 bpm is associated with an increase of 17% in mortality.

    “Large epidemiological studies have found that an increase in 5 bpm is associated with an increase of 17% in mortality”

    From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [98]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hozawa
Venue
American Journal of Hypertension
Published
2004-11
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
1005-1010
ISSN
0895-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171459914
Cited by
136
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (14657600, 13671095, 13470085)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
resting heart rate, home blood pressure monitoring, cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular risk prediction, systolic blood pressure, older adults, Japanese population
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure Determination, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Self Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review