The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Equine-related injury: a retrospective analysis of outcomes over a 10-year period
Abstract
Background Morbidity and financial loss caused by equine-related injuries may be significant. The purposes of this study were to determine the patterns of equine-related injury and the impact on outcomes. Methods A 10-year retrospective review of equine-related injuries was performed. Age, gender, mechanism, injury severity score, Glasgow Coma Score, length of stay, surgical interventions, and mortality were assessed. Results Of 80 emergency department evaluations, 76 patients were admitted and form the basis of this study. The most frequent mechanism of injury was fall (68%), followed by crush injuries (15%), kicks (8%), and trampling (5%). Musculoskeletal injuries were most common (64%). Thirty-eight (50%) patients required surgical intervention. Thirty-seven (52%) patients were discharged home; 34% required outpatient physical therapy, and 14% required inpatient rehabilitation. The mortality rate was 7%. Conclusions Equine-related injuries resulted in significant morbidity; most victims required outpatient or inpatient rehabilitation. The use of preventive strategies may minimize mortality and reduce the financial impact of postinjury morbidity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies of human-horse interactions have predominantly focused on injury and fatality statistics.
“Previous studies of human–horse interactions have predominantly focused on injury and fatality statistics [17,22,23,24,25].”
From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Thomas, 2006, Nonfatal horse-related injuries treated in emergency departments in the United States, Br J Sports Med, 40, 619, 10.1136/bjsm.2006.025858 · DOI · Paper page
- Kriss, 1997, Equine-related neurosurgical trauma: a prospective series of 30 patients, J Trauma, 43, 97, 10.1097/00005373-199707000-00022 · DOI
- Waller, 2000, Jockey injuries in the United States, JAMA, 283, 1326, 10.1001/jama.283.10.1326 · DOI
- Griffen, 2002, Injury during contact with horses: recent experience with 75 patients at a level I trauma center, South Med J, 95, 441, 10.1097/00007611-200295040-00014 · DOI · Paper page
- Whitlock, 1999, Injuries to riders in the cross country phase of eventing: the importance of protective equipment, Br J Sports Med, 33, 212, 10.1136/bjsm.33.3.212 · DOI
- Chitnavis, 1996, Accidents with horses: what has changed in 20 years?, Injury, 27, 103, 10.1016/0020-1383(95)00176-X · DOI · Paper page
- Moss, 2002, A changing pattern of injuries to horse riders, Emerg Med J, 19, 412, 10.1136/emj.19.5.412 · DOI
- Mayberry, 2007, Equestrian injury prevention efforts need more attention to novice riders, J Trauma, 62, 735
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chapman, M., Thomas, M., & Thompson, K. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122222 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Clarke, C. N., Tsuei, B. J., & Butler, K. L.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 195
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 702-704
- ISSN
- 0002-9610
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review