Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Equine-related injury: a retrospective analysis of outcomes over a 10-year period

Clarke, Callisia N., Tsuei, Betty J., Butler, Karyn L.·2008·The American Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background Morbidity and financial loss caused by equine-related injuries may be significant. The purposes of this study were to determine the patterns of equine-related injury and the impact on outcomes. Methods A 10-year retrospective review of equine-related injuries was performed. Age, gender, mechanism, injury severity score, Glasgow Coma Score, length of stay, surgical interventions, and mortality were assessed. Results Of 80 emergency department evaluations, 76 patients were admitted and form the basis of this study. The most frequent mechanism of injury was fall (68%), followed by crush injuries (15%), kicks (8%), and trampling (5%). Musculoskeletal injuries were most common (64%). Thirty-eight (50%) patients required surgical intervention. Thirty-seven (52%) patients were discharged home; 34% required outpatient physical therapy, and 14% required inpatient rehabilitation. The mortality rate was 7%. Conclusions Equine-related injuries resulted in significant morbidity; most victims required outpatient or inpatient rehabilitation. The use of preventive strategies may minimize mortality and reduce the financial impact of postinjury morbidity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.11.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Thomas, 2006, Nonfatal horse-related injuries treated in emergency departments in the United States, Br J Sports Med, 40, 619, 10.1136/bjsm.2006.025858 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Kriss, 1997, Equine-related neurosurgical trauma: a prospective series of 30 patients, J Trauma, 43, 97, 10.1097/00005373-199707000-00022 · DOI
  3. Waller, 2000, Jockey injuries in the United States, JAMA, 283, 1326, 10.1001/jama.283.10.1326 · DOI
  4. Griffen, 2002, Injury during contact with horses: recent experience with 75 patients at a level I trauma center, South Med J, 95, 441, 10.1097/00007611-200295040-00014 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Whitlock, 1999, Injuries to riders in the cross country phase of eventing: the importance of protective equipment, Br J Sports Med, 33, 212, 10.1136/bjsm.33.3.212 · DOI
  6. Chitnavis, 1996, Accidents with horses: what has changed in 20 years?, Injury, 27, 103, 10.1016/0020-1383(95)00176-X · DOI · Paper page
  7. Moss, 2002, A changing pattern of injuries to horse riders, Emerg Med J, 19, 412, 10.1136/emj.19.5.412 · DOI
  8. Mayberry, 2007, Equestrian injury prevention efforts need more attention to novice riders, J Trauma, 62, 735

Cited by

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review