The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of frailty on outcomes in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Age has historically been used to predict negative post-surgical outcomes. The concept of frailty was introduced to explain the discrepancies that exist between patients’ chronological and physiological age. The efficacy of the modified frailty index (mFI) to predict surgical risk is not clear. Objective: We sought to synthesize the current literature to quantify the impact of frailty as a prognostic indicator across all surgical specialties. Data Sources: Pubmed and Cochrane databases were screened from inception to 1 January 2018. Study Selection: Studies utilizing the modified Frailty Index (mFI) as a post-operative indicator of any type of surgery. The mFI was selected based on a preliminary search showing it to be the most commonly applied index in surgical cohorts. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Articles were selected via a two-stage process undertaken by two reviewers (AP and DS). Statistical analysis was performed in Revman (Review manager V5.3). The random-effects model was used to calculate the Risk Ratios (RR). Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): The primary outcomes: post-operative complications, re-admission, reoperation, discharge to a skilled care facility, and mortality. Results: This meta-analysis of 16 studies randomizes 683,487 patients, 444,885 frail, from gastrointestinal, vascular, orthopedic, urogenital, head and neck, emergency, neurological, oncological, cardiothoracic, as well as general surgery cohorts. Frail patients were more likely to experience complications (RR 1.48, 95%CI 1.35–1.61; p<0.001), major complications (RR 2.03, 95%CI 1.26–3.29; p=0.004), and wound complications (RR 1.52, 95%CI 1.47–1.57; p<0.001). Furthermore, frail patients had higher risk of readmission (RR 1.61, 95%CI 1.44–1.80; p<0.001) and discharge to skilled care (RR 2.15, 95%CI 1.92–2.40; p<0.001). Notably, the risk of mortality was 4.19 times more likely in frail patients (95% CI 2.96—5.92; p< 0.001). Conclusions and Relevance: This study is the first to synthesize the evidence across multiple surgical specialties and demonstrates that the mFI is an underappreciated prognostic indicator that strongly correlates with the risk of post-surgical morbidity and mortality. This supports that formal incorporation of pre-operative frailty assessment improves surgical decision-making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype
Fried, L. P., Tangen, C. M., Walston, J., Newman, A. B., Hirsch, C., Gottdiener, J., Seeman, T., Tracy, R., Kop, W. J., Burke, G., et al. (2001) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146 · Cited by 24,907
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Wang, G., Ma, R., Qiao, G., Wada, K., Aizawa, Y., & Satoh, T. (2015) · Integrative Medicine International · doi:10.1159/000368408 · Cited by 18,657
Clegg, A., Young, J., Iliffe, S., Rikkert, M. O., & Rockwood, K. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62167-9 · Cited by 9,503
A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people
Rockwood, K. (2005) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.050051 · Cited by 8,968
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5 · Cited by 4,826
A standard procedure for creating a frailty index
Searle, S. D., Mitnitski, A., Gahbauer, E. A., Gill, T. M., & Rockwood, K. (2008) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/1471-2318-8-24 · Cited by 3,568
Cited by
Prehabilitation, enhanced recovery after surgery, or both? A narrative review
Gillis, C., Ljungqvist, O., & Carli, F. (2022) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2021.12.007 · Cited by 308
Gondal, A. B., Hsu, C.-H., Zeeshan, M., Hamidi, M., Joseph, B., & Ghaderi, I. (2019) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2019.06.028 · Cited by 46
Reddy, R., Zhao, S., Boscardin, W. J., Nik-Ahd, F., Van Kuiken, M., & Suskind, A. M. (2022) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2022.06.031 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Panayi, A. C., Orkaby, A. R., Sakthivel, D., Endo, Y., Varon, D., Roh, D., Orgill, D. P., Neppl, R. L., Javedan, H., Bhasin, S., & Sinha, I.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 218
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 393-400
- ISSN
- 0002-9610 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2903027527
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of frailty on outcomes in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.020
- The paper
- Panayi, A. C., Orkaby, A. R., Sakthivel, D., Endo, Y., Varon, D., Roh, D., Orgill, D. P., Neppl, R. L., Javedan, H., Bhasin, S., & Sinha, I. (2019). Impact of frailty on outcomes in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.