The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Prospective, Multicenter Trial of a Long‐Term Bioabsorbable Mesh With Sepra Technology in Cohort of Challenging Laparoscopic Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repairs (ATLAS Trial)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several studies have demonstrated that P4HB mesh is safe and effective on the short term even in contaminated fields, with acceptable rates of surgical site occurrences (SSOs) and surgical site infections (SSIs) [5, 6, 7].”
From Long‐Term Outcomes After Slowly Resorbable P4HB Mesh Implantation: A Multicenter Analysis From European Registry (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Long‐term recurrence rates appear to be comparable to those of non‐resorbable synthetic meshes [1, 6, 8].”
From Long‐Term Outcomes After Slowly Resorbable P4HB Mesh Implantation: A Multicenter Analysis From European Registry (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“The material is eliminated by the body in 12–18 months through hydrolytic enzymatic degradation after which tissue integrity must be maintained by the patient's own tissue regeneration [5, 6].”
From Long‐Term Outcomes After Slowly Resorbable P4HB Mesh Implantation: A Multicenter Analysis From European Registry (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“The material is eliminated by the body in 12–18 months through hydrolytic enzymatic degradation after which tissue integrity must be maintained by the patient's own tissue regeneration [5, 6].”
From Long‐Term Outcomes After Slowly Resorbable P4HB Mesh Implantation: A Multicenter Analysis From European Registry (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“While complications such as chronic pain, fistula formation, and mesh infections are well‐documented with non‐resorbable meshes [10], few studies have addressed whether similar late‐onset adverse events occur with biosynthetic meshes after their complete degradation [6].”
From Long‐Term Outcomes After Slowly Resorbable P4HB Mesh Implantation: A Multicenter Analysis From European Registry (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
1 more claim about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Roth, J. S., Anthone, G. J., Selzer, D. J., Poulose, B. K., Pierce, R. A., Bittner, J. G., Hope, W. W., Dunn, R. M., Martindale, R. G., Goldblatt, M. I., et al. (2021) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.002 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Cited by
van den Berg, R., Wieser, M., López‐Cano, M., Bueno‐Lledó, J., Köckerling, F., Chatzimavroudis, G., Gonella‐Pacchiotti, C., Stabilini, C., Ortega‐Deballon, P., Romain, B., et al. (2026) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/wjs.70331 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Hope, W. W., El-Ghazzawy, A. G., Winterstein, B. A., Blatnik, J. A., Davis, S. S., Greenberg, J. A., Sanchez, N. C., Pauli, E. M., Tseng, D. M., LeBlanc, K. A., Roberts, K. E., Bower, C. E., Parra-Davila, E., Roth, S. J., Deeken, C. R., & Smith, E. F.
- Venue
- Annals of Medicine & Surgery
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 73
- ISSN
- 2049-0801
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
