The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social complexity predicts transitive reasoning in prosimian primates
Open accessAbstract
Transitive Inference is a form of deductive reasoning that has been suggested as one cognitive mechanism by which animals could learn the many relationships within their group's dominance hierarchy. This process thus bears relevance to the social intelligence hypothesis which posits evolutionary links between various forms of social and nonsocial cognition. Recent evidence corroborates the link between social complexity and transitive inference and indicates that highly social animals may show superior transitive reasoning even in nonsocial contexts. We examined the relationship between social complexity and transitive inference in two species of prosimians, a group of primates that diverged from the common ancestor of monkeys, apes, and humans over 50 million years ago. In Experiment 1, highly social ring-tailed lemurs, Lemur catta, outperformed the less social mongoose lemurs, Eulemur mongoz, in tests of transitive inference and showed more robust representations of the underlying ordinal relationships between the stimuli. In Experiment 2, after training under a correction procedure that emphasized the underlying linear dimension of the series, both species showed similar transitive inference. This finding suggests that the two lemur species differ not in their fundamental ability to make transitive inferences, but rather in their predisposition to mentally organize information along a common underlying dimension. Together, these results support the hypothesis that social complexity is an important selective pressure for the evolution of cognitive abilities relevant to transitive reasoning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Comparisons on actual cognitive tests of species that live in social systems of differing social complexity offer the strongest test of the social intelligence hypothesis because they provide a direct comparison of species’ cognition in a specific domain (e.g., Bond et al. 2003; MacLean et al. 2008).”
From How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology (2012) · cites this paper as MacLean et al. 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hutt, S. J. (1977) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(77)90136-1 · Cited by 2,327
Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality
MOYER, R. S., & LANDAUER, T. K. (1967) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2151519a0 · Cited by 2,068
Byrne, R. W., & Whiten, A. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,683
Cognition, evolution, and behavior
Shettleworth, S. J. (2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5652 · Cited by 1,455
The Social Function of Intellect
Humphrey, N. K. (1976) · CogPrints (University of Southampton) · Cited by 1,351
Bateson, P., & Hinde, R. A. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,125
The Domestication of Social Cognition in Dogs
Hare, B. A., Brown, M. L., Williamson, C., & Tomasello, M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1072702 · Cited by 1,089
How monkeys see the world: inside the mind of another species
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-6260 · Cited by 984
Lemur Social Behavior and Primate Intelligence
Jolly, A. (1966) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.153.3735.501 · Cited by 909
Williams (1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-3275 · Cited by 820
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The evolution of self-control.
MacLean, E. L., Hare, B., Nunn, C. L., Addessi, E., Amici, F., Anderson, R. C., Aureli, F., Baker, J. M., Bania, A. E., Barnard, A. M., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323533111 · Cited by 819
Self-citationForaging Cognition: Reviving the Ecological Intelligence Hypothesis
Rosati, A. G. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.011 · Cited by 283
How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology
MacLean, E. L., Matthews, L. J., Hare, B. A., Nunn, C. L., Anderson, R. C., Aureli, F., Brannon, E. M., Call, J., Drea, C. M., Emery, N. J., et al. (2012) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-011-0448-8 · Cited by 260
Self-citationThe establishment and maintenance of dominance hierarchies
Tibbetts, E., Pardo-Sanchez, J., & Weise, C. (2022) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0450 · Cited by 216
The Emergence and Representation of Knowledge about Social and Nonsocial Hierarchies
Kumaran, D., Melo, H., & Düzel, E. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.035 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- MacLean, E. L., Merritt, D. J., & Brannon, E. M.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- MacLean, Evan L.
- Venue
- Animal Behaviour
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 479-486
- ISSN
- 0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2598410
- OpenAlex
- W2106451468
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- John Merck Fund
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD049912)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- transitive inference, social complexity, prosimian primates, Lemur catta, social intelligence hypothesis, dominance hierarchy, cognitive evolution, comparative cognition, Eulemur mongoz
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
