Cited by 2,068Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality

MOYER, ROBERT S., LANDAUER, THOMAS K.·1967·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/2151519a0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The trend of progressively slower choices up to the penultimate reflects more difficult inequality decisions as ranges become narrower, or the effect of having to consider more significant digits or letters.

    “We hypothesize that it reflects more difficult inequality decisions as the ranges become narrower, (Moyer and Landauer, 1967), or simply the effect of having to consider more significant digits or letters.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MOYER, R. S., & LANDAUER, T. K.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
1967-09
Volume
215
Issue
5109
Pages
1519-1520
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2001569942
Cited by
2,068
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 107 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 99
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
numerical cognition, mental number line, numerical comparison
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Judgment, Mathematics, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review