Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The trend of progressively slower choices up to the penultimate reflects more difficult inequality decisions as ranges become narrower, or the effect of having to consider more significant digits or letters.
“We hypothesize that it reflects more difficult inequality decisions as the ranges become narrower, (Moyer and Landauer, 1967), or simply the effect of having to consider more significant digits or letters.”
From Selection from alphabetic and numeric menu trees using a touch screen: breadth, depth, and width (1985) · cites this paper as Moyer and Landauer, 1967
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.211 · Cited by 6,282 · see citing works
Self-citationEye fixations and cognitive processes
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3 · Cited by 1,730 · see citing works
Dyslexia and dyscalculia: two learning disorders with different cognitive profiles
Landerl, K., Fussenegger, B., Moll, K., & Willburger, E. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.006 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Lindemann-Matthies, P., Junge, X., & Matthies, D. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.003 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect
Moyer, R. S., & Bayer, R. H. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90025-6 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Self-citationSelection from alphabetic and numeric menu trees using a touch screen: breadth, depth, and width
Landauer, T. K., & Nachbar, D. W. (1985) · ACM SIGCHI Bulletin · doi:10.1145/1165385.317470 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial complexity predicts transitive reasoning in prosimian primates
MacLean, E. L., Merritt, D. J., & Brannon, E. M. (2008) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.025 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Domain‐specific and domain‐general changes in children's development of number comparison
Holloway, I. D., & Ansari, D. (2008) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00712.x · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Dyscalculia and dyslexia in adults: cognitive bases of comorbidity
Wilson, A. J., Andrewes, S. G., Struthers, H., Rowe, V. M., Bogdanovic, R., & Waldie, K. E. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.017 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Moll, K., Göbel, S. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2015) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2014.899570 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Caviola, S., Colling, L. J., Mammarella, I. C., & Szűcs, D. (2020) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12957 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
The cognitive architecture for chaining of two mental operations
Sackur, J., & Dehaene, S. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.010 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Tourva, A., Spanoudis, G., & Demetriou, A. (2016) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.12.001 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Exploring Numeracy in Word Embeddings
Naik, A., Ravichander, A., Rose, C., & Hovy, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1329 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Cortico-spinal modularity in the parieto-frontal system: A new perspective on action control
Bufacchi, R. J., Battaglia-Mayer, A., Iannetti, G. D., & Caminiti, R. (2023) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102537 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Snyder, R. J., Barrett, L. P., Emory, R. A., & Perdue, B. M. (2021) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-021-01504-5 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Hope, S. F., Willgohs, K. R., Dittakul, S., & Plotnik, J. M. (2025) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-024-00655-y · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Ziegler, M. G., Liu, Z.-X., Arsenault, J., Dang, C., Grady, C., Rosenbaum, R. S., & Moscovitch, M. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad272 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- MOYER, R. S., & LANDAUER, T. K.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1967-09
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- 5109
- Pages
- 1519-1520
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2001569942
- Cited by
- 2,068
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 62 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 107 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 99
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- numerical cognition, mental number line, numerical comparison
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Judgment, Mathematics, Reaction Time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review