Male dominance rank and reproductive success in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii.
Open accessAbstract
Competition for fertile females determines male reproductive success in many species. The priority of access model predicts that male dominance rank determines access to females, but this model has been difficult to test in wild populations, particularly in promiscuous mating systems. Tests of the model have produced variable results, probably because of the differing socioecological circumstances of individual species and populations. We tested the predictions of the priority of access model in the chimpanzees of Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Chimpanzees are an interesting species in which to test the model because of their fission-fusion grouping patterns, promiscuous mating system and alternative male mating strategies. We determined paternity for 34 offspring over a 22-year period and found that the priority of access model was generally predictive of male reproductive success. However, we found that younger males had higher success per male than older males, and low-ranking males sired more offspring than predicted. Low-ranking males sired offspring with younger, less desirable females and by engaging in consortships more often than high-ranking fathers. Although alpha males never sired offspring with related females, inbreeding avoidance of high-ranking male relatives did not completely explain the success of low-ranking males. While our work confirms that male rank typically predicts male chimpanzee reproductive success, other factors are also important; mate choice and alternative male strategies can give low-ranking males access to females more often than would be predicted by the model. Furthermore, the success of younger males suggests that they are more successful in sperm competition.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The typical primate dominance system (alpha male achieving position by defeating lower-ranking males, dominating females, higher fitness) is found in chimpanzees, gorillas, savanna baboons, and most other primates living in multi-female, multi-male groups.
“This system is found in chimpanzees (Wroblewski et al., 2009), gorillas (Gorilla spp.) (Nsubuga et al., 2008; Breuer et al., 2012), savanna baboons (Papio spp.) (Alberts et al., 2006; Baniel et al., 2017), and most other primates living in multi-female, multi-male groups.”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Wroblewski et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 105 · Cited by 306
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Boesch C Boesch-Achermann H 2000 The Chimpanzees of the Taï Forest Oxford Oxford University Press
- Nishida T Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M 1987 Chimpanzees and bonobos: cooperative relationships among males Primate Societies Smuts BB Cheney DL Seyfarth RM Wrangham RW Struhsaker TT 299 305 Chicago University of Chicago Press
- Nishida T Takasaki H Takahata Y 1990 Demography and reproductive profiles The Chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains: Sexual and Life History Strategies Nishida T 63 97 Tokyo University of Tokyo Press
- Pusey A Murray C Wallauer W Wilson M Wroblewski E Goodall J 2008b Severe aggression among female chimpanzees at Gombe National Park, Tanzania International Journal of Primatology 29 949 973
- Reynolds V 2005 The Chimpanzees of the Budongo Forest: Ecology, Behavior, and Conservation Oxford Oxford University Press
- Authors
- Wroblewski, E. E., Murray, C. M., Keele, B. F., Schumacher-Stankey, J. C., Hahn, B. H., & Pusey, A. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Lincoln Park Zoo (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wroblewski, Emily E.
- Venue
- Animal Behaviour
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 873-885
- ISSN
- 0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2689943
- OpenAlex
- W2115507118
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 105
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 20.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (BCS-0452315)
- National Institutes of Health (R01 AI058715)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii, male dominance rank, reproductive success, paternity, promiscuous mating system, consortship, inbreeding avoidance, mate choice, sperm competition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review