Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication
Open accessAbstract
Parallels in anatomy between humans and domesticated mammals suggest that for the last 300,000 years, Homo sapiens has experienced more intense selection against the propensity for reactive aggression than any other species of Homo. Selection against reactive aggression, a process that can also be called self-domestication, would help explain various physiological, behavioral and cognitive features of humans, including the unique system of egalitarian male hierarchy in mobile hunter-gatherers. Here I review nine leading proposals that could potentially explain why self-domestication occurred in H. sapiens, whether by selecting in favor of cooperation and tolerance or by selecting against aggressiveness. To account for the domestication syndrome, proposals must explain what led to a decline in fitness of highly aggressive males, and why the explanatory factor applies only to H. sapiens rather than to other species of Homo. The proposed explanations invoke genetic group selection; group-structured culture selection (also known as cultural group selection); social selection by female mate choice; social selection by male partner choice; increased self-control; cooperative breeding; high population density; use of lethal weapons; and language-based conspiracy. Most proposals face difficulties in accounting for the origins and/or maintenance of self-domestication. I conclude that the evolution of language-based conspiracy, which is a form of collective intentionality, was the key factor initiating and maintaining self-domestication in H. sapiens, because it is the most convincing mechanism for explaining the selective pressure against individually powerful fighters. Sophisticated language enabled males of low fighting prowess to coordinate in executing physically aggressive and domineering alpha males. This system is known today as a leveling mechanism in small-scale societies. Group-structured culture selection possibly accelerated the process.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Wrangham reviews nine hypotheses for why *Homo sapiens* underwent self-domestication via reduced reactive aggression, arguing each must explain why effective alpha fighters failed to monopolize fitness and why this applied only to *H. sapiens*. He concludes that language-based conspiracy—coordinated planned execution of domineering males—best accounts for initiating and maintaining selection against reactive aggression, with group-structured culture selection possibly accelerating it.
Key findings
- Anatomical evidence indicates a domestication syndrome in *H. sapiens*; the Jebel Irhoud specimens from around 315,000 years ago show short faces, small teeth, and reduced brow-ridges, suggesting selection for self-domestication began before 300,000 years ago. Within-group aggressive conflict frequencies in *H. sapiens* are two to three orders of magnitude lower than in wild chimpanzees and bonobos.
- Of nine proposals reviewed, most face difficulties in accounting for the origins and/or maintenance of reduced reactive aggression: genetic group selection, group-structured culture selection, female mate choice, male partner choice, self-control, cooperative breeding, population density, and lethal weapons.
- Language-based conspiracy is argued to be the key factor: sophisticated language enabled males of low fighting prowess to cooperatively plan the execution of physically aggressive and domineering alpha males, a system known today as a leveling mechanism in small-scale societies.
- Group-structured culture selection possibly accelerated the process, but the paper concludes it is unlikely to have been important 300,000 years ago and does not by itself explain selection against aggression.
Methods
- Conceptual review and hypothesis paper; no new empirical data are presented. It reviews nine leading proposals for self-domestication in *H. sapiens*, selected as prominent explanations for reduced aggressiveness or increased cooperation.
- Each proposal is evaluated against two challenges: it must account for the failure of the most individually effective fighters to dominate access to resources and maximize fitness, and it must apply only to *H. sapiens*, since only this species is known to exhibit a domestication syndrome.
- The analysis draws on comparative primate, fossil, anatomical, ethnographic, and experimental literature; Table 1 summarizes merits and problems for each scenario.
Limitations
- Stated: the paper does not review any explanation in detail; the timing of language skills is speculative; the hypothesis is hard to test because relevant cultural practices are extinct; the ethnographic record of capital punishment is thin; and the composition of domestication syndromes is unpredictable, with uncertain biological mechanisms.
- Stated: the conclusion that *H. sapiens* acquired low reactive aggression during the last 300,000 years can still be challenged on the basis that the supposed domestication syndrome may reflect independent adaptations or an earlier genus-wide adaptation.
- Evident: as a review/hypothesis synthesis, it offers no primary quantitative test of execution rates or genetic selection, and it relies on present-day hunter-gatherers and nonhuman primates as analogs for past behavior.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 103 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Interpretationreasoning
Parallels in anatomy between humans and domesticated mammals suggest that for the last 300,000 years, Homo sapiens has experienced more intense selection against the propensity for reactive aggression than other species of Homo.
“Parallels in anatomy between humans and domesticated mammals suggest that for the last 300,000 years, Homo sapiens has experienced more intense selection against the propensity for reactive aggression than other species of Homo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Leach, 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hare, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wrangham, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The typical primate dominance system (alpha male achieving position by defeating lower-ranking males, dominating females, higher fitness) is found in chimpanzees, gorillas, savanna baboons, and most other primates living in multi-female, multi-male groups.
“This system is found in chimpanzees (Wroblewski et al., 2009), gorillas (Gorilla spp.) (Nsubuga et al., 2008; Breuer et al., 2012), savanna baboons (Papio spp.) (Alberts et al., 2006; Baniel et al., 2017), and most other primates living in multi-female, multi-male groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Pleistocene Homo experienced selection for self-domestication starting before 300,000 years ago.
“These points suggest that Pleistocene Homo experienced selection for self-domestication starting before 300,000 years ago.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
All four features used by archeologists to recognize a domesticated species in the fossil record are found in H. sapiens.
“Leach showed that all four traits are found in H. sapiens, although cranial capacity was not reduced until the end of the Pleistocene and the significance of its reduction has been challenged (Ruff et al., 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The presence of a domestication syndrome appears to be a signal of selection against reactive aggression.
“The presence of a domestication syndrome therefore appears to be a signal of selection again reactive aggression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Interpretationcitation
H. sapiens evolved greater docility than pre-sapiens ancestors.
“The evidence for a domestication syndrome in H. sapiens suggests that our species evolved greater docility than pre-sapiens ancestors (Hare, 2017; Wrangham, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hare, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wrangham, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Among humans, alpha males do not achieve their position by defeating all other group males in one-on-one fights.
“Humans are also exceptions to the typical type of primate dominance hierarchy, because among humans alpha males do not achieve their position by defeating all other group males in one-on-one fights.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The species in which selection first occurred against male reactive aggression would have been the mid-Pleistocene Homo that gave rise to H. sapiens.
“Based on the signals of human domestication found throughout the last 300,000 years, the species in which selection first occurred against male reactive aggression would have been the mid-Pleistocene Homo that give rise to H. sapiens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The ancestral Homo species sometimes called Homo heidelbergensis lived in social communities and had dominance hierarchies typical of primates living in multi-female, multi-male groups.
- Interpretationreasoning
Most of the nine leading proposals for self-domestication in H. sapiens face difficulties in accounting for the origins and/or maintenance of reduced reactive aggression.
“Most of these proposals face difficulties in accounting for the origins and/or maintenance of reduced reactive aggression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Selection against reactive aggression, a process that can also be called self-domestication, would help explain various physiological, behavioral, and cognitive features of humans, including the unique system of egalitarian male hierarchy in mobile hunter-gatherers.
“Selection against reactive aggression, a process that can also be called self-domestication, would help explain various physiological, behavioral, and cognitive features of humans, including the unique system of egalitarian male hierarchy in mobile hunter-gatherers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Among hunter-gatherers, the excesses of would-be despots are suppressed by coalitions of adult males, who resort to execution when lesser mechanisms fail.
“Instead, the excesses of would-be despots are suppressed by coalitions of adult males, who resort to execution when lesser mechanisms fail (Boehm, 1999, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Boehm, 1999 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Boehm, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The anatomical evidence for similarities between H. sapiens and domesticated animals is particularly strong.
“While there are various physiological, behavioral, cognitive, and genetic similarities between H. sapiens and domesticated animals, the anatomical evidence is particularly strong (Leach, 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Leach, 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Selection for tameness in chickens produces several reproductive and physiological changes similar to those found in the mammalian domestication syndrome.
“Selection for tameness in chickens Gallus gallus domesticus also produces several reproductive and physiological changes similar to those found in the mammalian domestication syndrome (Agnvall et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Agnvall et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Group selection is inherently unlikely to have had major effects in humans given the low extinction rates and high permeability of human groups.
“More generally, group selection is inherently unlikely to have had major effects in humans given the low extinction rates and high permeability of human groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Bonobos show evidence of having been self-domesticated.
“This exception to the general rule of alphas achieving their top rank through personal fighting ability is understandable, since bonobos show evidence of having been self-domesticated (Hare et al., 2012; Wrangham, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hare et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wrangham, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A high degree of cooperation tends to be facilitated by reduced aggression.
“because a high degree of cooperation tends to be facilitated by reduced aggression (Simon, 1990; Melis et al., 2006; Cieri et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Domesticated mammals tend to share a variety of similarities in their appearance, anatomy and behavior, a phenotypic suite now called the domestication syndrome.
“Darwin (1868) showed that domesticated mammals tend to share a variety of similarities in their appearance, anatomy and behavior, a phenotypic suite now called the domestication syndrome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Darwin, 1868
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
H. sapiens has frequencies of within-group aggressive conflict that are two to three orders of magnitude lower than those found among wild chimpanzees and bonobos.
“H. sapiens has frequencies of within-group aggressive conflict that are two to three orders of magnitude lower than those found among wild chimpanzees Pan troglodytes and bonobos P. paniscus (Wrangham, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wrangham, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Those facts are incompatible with the idea that selection pressures against individually selfish behavior would be significant.
“Those facts are incompatible with the idea that selection pressures against individually selfish behavior would be significant (West et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites West et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Chimpanzees have rates of death from intergroup aggression in the same order of magnitude as mobile hunter-gatherers.
“However chimpanzees have been found to have rates of death from intergroup aggression in the same order of magnitude as mobile hunter-gatherers (Wrangham et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wrangham et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Anatomical and behavioral data are consistent with humans having undergone a process of selection for reduced aggression during the last 300,000 years.
“Anatomical and behavioral data are thus consistent with humans having undergone a process of selection for reduced aggression during the last 300,000 years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The parochial altruism hypothesis is challenged by behavioral similarities between humans and chimpanzees.
“Even if intergroup conflict became more important in H. sapiens than in earlier Homo, however, the parochial altruism hypothesis is challenged by behavioral similarities between humans and chimpanzees.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The evolution of language-based conspiracy, a form of collective intentionality, was the key factor initiating and maintaining self-domestication in H. sapiens.
“I conclude that the evolution of language-based conspiracy, which is a form of collective intentionality, was the key factor initiating and maintaining self-domestication in H. sapiens”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Estimates of between-group genetic differentiation in hunter-gatherers and other small-scale human societies are similar to those among chimpanzees, if not slightly higher among chimpanzees.
“Yet estimates of the degree of between-group genetic differentiation in hunter-gatherers and other small-scale human societies likewise prove to be similar to those among chimpanzees, if not slightly higher among chimpanzees (Langergraber et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Langergraber et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Evidence has recently been increasing for humans Homo sapiens having a domestication syndrome.
“It is interesting, therefore, that evidence has recently been increasing for humans Homo sapiens having a domestication syndrome (Leach, 2003; Francis, 2015; Henrich, 2016; Hare, 2017; Hare and Wrangham, 2017; Theofanopoulou et al., 2017; Wilkins, 2017; Benítez-Burraco et al., 2018; Sánchez-Villagra and van Schaik, 2019; Wrangham, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Leach, 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hare, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wrangham, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The cooperative breeding hypothesis has not yet been proposed in a way that would explain the reduction of reactive aggression specifically in H. sapiens.
“Critically, the cooperative breeding hypothesis has not yet been proposed in a way that would explain the reduction of reactive aggression specifically in H. sapiens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Increasing self-control is likely to be relevant as a contributor to the social dynamics of a self-domesticated species more than as a selective pressure against reactive aggression.
“Increasing self-control is therefore likely to be relevant as a contributor to the social dynamics of a self-domesticated species more than as a selective pressure against reactive aggression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Alpha-males still tend to obtain the largest share of paternity.
“Nevertheless, alpha-males still tend to obtain the largest share of paternity (Dubuc et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dubuc et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Changes in individual cultural behavior that occurred on a longer time-scale are known to have led to gene-culture coevolution, e.g., the development of cooking, or milk-drinking by adults.
“However, changes in individual cultural behavior that occurred on a longer time-scale are known to have led to gene-culture coevolution, e.g., the development of cooking, or milk-drinking by adults (Wrangham, 2009; Curry, 2013; Henrich, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Cross-cultural studies in humans consistently find that higher frequencies of war are correlated with higher, not lower, frequencies of interpersonal aggression.
“Likewise cross-cultural studies in humans consistently find that higher frequencies of war are correlated with higher, not lower, frequencies of interpersonal aggression (Ember and Ember, 1994).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ember and Ember, 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
In practice the propensity for male reactive aggression varies widely in cooperatively breeding mammals.
“While cooperative breeding could in theory promote social tolerance toward infants, juveniles, and mothers by alloparents such as grandparents, sisters and fathers, in practice the propensity for male reactive aggression varies widely in cooperatively breeding mammals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The female mate choice hypothesis does not account for the reproductive failure of intransigently despotic males.
“There is an important difficulty for the female mate choice hypothesis, however: it does not account for the reproductive failure of intransigently despotic males.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Social selection has likely been important in promoting altruistic, and non-competitive behavior within groups.
“On the assumption that humans benefit by cooperating in gathering, hunting, warfare and other tasks, social selection has likely been important in promoting altruistic, and non-competitive behavior within groups (Nesse, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nesse, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Humans benefit by cooperating in gathering, hunting, warfare and other tasks.
- Interpretationcitation
The tribal social instincts hypothesis faces the difficulty that successful intergroup conflict is not necessarily associated with reduced within-group aggression.
“While the tribal social instincts hypothesis is thus theoretically attractive, it faces the difficulty that successful intergroup conflict is not necessarily associated with reduced within-group aggression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The cooperative breeding hypothesis is concerned mainly with assistance in child-rearing, rather than the control of aggression.
“Second, the cooperative breeding hypothesis is concerned mainly with assistance in child-rearing, rather than the control of aggression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
The result was a new kind of interdependence, such that individuals who were collaborative and less selfish were favored: cooperators fed better than those who were not chosen as foraging partners.
“The result was a new kind of interdependence, such that individuals who were collaborative and less selfish were favored: cooperators fed better, for instance, than those who were not chosen as foraging partners.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tomasello, 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Female choice alone appears incapable of explaining how, before males became the less aggressive form found today, self-domestication began.
“Female choice alone, however, appears incapable of explaining how, before males became the less aggressive form found today, self-domestication began.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Female choice alone would not have led to self-domestication.
“This means that female choice alone would not have led to self-domestication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A female mid-Pleistocene Homo would not have had the physical ability to freely express her mate choice.
- Interpretationreasoning
Before males had evolved their reduced aggressiveness, female choice would have been a weak force in the face of the physical dominance and coercive behavior of bullying males.
“Before males had evolved their reduced aggressiveness, female choice would have been a weak force in the face of the physical dominance and coercive behavior of bullying males.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Due to this ecological change, mid-Pleistocene Homo were forced to collaborate in the food quest, rather than foraging individually as they had until then.
“First, due to this ecological change, mid-Pleistocene Homo were forced to collaborate in the food quest, rather than foraging individually as they had until then.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tomasello, 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The lethal weapons hypothesis appears to be as applicable to various other Homo who apparently used lethal weapons, including H. heidelbergensis and Homo neanderthalensis, as it is to H. sapiens.
“The hypothesis appears to be as applicable to various other Homo who apparently used lethal weapons, including H. heidelbergensis and Homo neanderthalensis, as it is to H. sapiens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The language-based conspiracy system can plausibly account for selection against reactive aggression occurring only in H. sapiens.
“This system can plausibly account for selection against reactive aggression occurring only in H. sapiens, as Boehm (1999, 2012) has argued.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boehm, 1999, 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The self-control hypothesis lacks a mechanism responsible for selecting against successful alpha-male behavior.
“Somewhat similar problems apply to the self-control hypothesis (5), which similarly lacks a mechanism responsible for selecting against successful alpha-male behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
If a would-be despot resists being controlled by mechanisms such as ridicule, reprimands or ostracism, he may be executed.
“If such a would-be despot resists being controlled by mechanisms such as ridicule, reprimands or ostracism, he may be executed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The ethnographic evidence for the language-based conspiracy hypothesis is vulnerable to the difficulty of testing the rate of execution of reactive aggressors.
“Against this hypothesis, the ethnographic evidence is vulnerable to the difficulty of testing the rate of execution of reactive aggressors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
After the selective system had been initiated, there would likely have been a positive feedback loop leading to an accelerating evolution of traits associated with domestication, as the fossil record seems to indicate.
“Thus after the selective system had been initiated, there would likely have been a positive feedback loop leading to an accelerating evolution of traits associated with domestication, as the fossil record seems to indicate (Cieri et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cieri et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
A sufficiently aggressive male can achieve his goals even in the face of females or males choosing not to partner with him, as is routinely seen in non-human primates.
“The problem is that a sufficiently aggressive male can achieve his goals even in the face of females or males choosing not to partner with him, as is routinely seen in non-human primates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In its current form, the cooperative breeding hypothesis is not a candidate for explaining recent self-domestication because it has been applied to many Homo species rather than specifically to H. sapiens.
“To date, however, the cooperative breeding hypothesis has been applied to many Homo species, rather than specifically to H. sapiens, so in its current form it is not a candidate for explaining recent self-domestication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Dangerous weapons were likely used much earlier than 400,000 years ago given evidence of hunting.
“Dangerous weapons were likely used much earlier given evidence of hunting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Among wild monkeys and apes there is no evidence for an association between population density and social tolerance.
“Furthermore among wild monkeys and apes there is no evidence for an association between population density and social tolerance (Wrangham, 2014);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wrangham, 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Humans can execute victims without using hunting weapons, for example by hanging, burning, drowning, beating, or throwing off a precipice.
“Humans too can execute victims without using hunting weapons, for example by hanging, burning, drowning, beating, or throwing off a precipice (Otterbein, 1986).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Otterbein, 1986
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The hypothesis that H. sapiens has indeed undergone persistent selection against reactive aggression seems strong enough to warrant attempts to explain it.
“For these reasons the hypothesis that H. sapiens has indeed undergone persistent selection against reactive aggression seems strong enough to warrant attempts to explain it (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The anatomical signal of a domestication syndrome in H. sapiens is a reliable indicator of reduced reactive aggression.
- Premisecitation
Well-balanced fire-hardened spears considered to have been throwable are in evidence at Schöningen by at least 400,000 years ago.
“Well-balanced fire-hardened spears considered to have been throwable are in evidence at Schöningen by at least 400,000 years ago (Thieme, 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thieme, 1997 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Linguistic skills would probably then improve also.
“Linguistic skills would probably then improve also (Benítez-Burraco et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Benítez-Burraco et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Those kinds of ability depend on a sophisticated form of language.
“Those kinds of ability depend on a sophisticated form of language (Wrangham, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wrangham, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lions, wolves, spotted hyenas and chimpanzees can kill adult conspecifics at very little risk of injury to themselves.
“Lions, wolves, spotted hyenas Crocuta crocuta and chimpanzees can kill adult conspecifics at very little risk of injury to themselves (Wrangham, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wrangham, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Weapons seem unlikely to have been an important influence on the differences in selective regime between H. sapiens and other species of Homo.
“Weapons seem unlikely to have been an important influence on the differences in selective regime between H. sapiens and other species of Homo, however.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The evolutionary decline of reactive aggression would have opened increasing possibilities for social selection and self-control to contribute to the development of prosocial tendencies.
“The evolutionary decline of reactive aggression would have opened increasing possibilities for social selection and self-control to contribute to the development of prosocial tendencies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In groups with primate-style alpha males, on their own, social selection involving individual choice of unaggressive mates and task partners cannot have evolutionary effects.
“In groups with primate-style alpha males, by contrast, I conclude that on their own these styles of social selection cannot have evolutionary effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The ability to conduct planned executions means that killers must share explicit intentions with each other, a capacity unique to humans.
“The ability to conduct planned executions means that the killers must share explicit intentions with each other, a capacity that is unique to humans (Tomasello, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tomasello, 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Among the nine proposals reviewed, the explanation that best accounts for a novel selection pressure leading to a reduction in reactive aggression starting around 300,000 years ago is the emergence of collective intentionality in the form of language-based conspiracy.
“In sum, among the nine proposals reviewed, the explanation that best accounts for a novel selection pressure leading to a reduction in reactive aggression starting around 300,000 years ago is the emergence of collective intentionality in the form of language-based conspiracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The ability to devise shared plans is a rubicon for predictably being able to control physically powerful alpha males who can only be defeated by coordinated action.
“We can be confident, however, that the ability to devise shared plans is a rubicon for predictably being able to control physically powerful alpha males who can only be defeated by coordinated action.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The influence of increased population density has no clear support at present.
“The influence of increased population density thus has no clear support at present.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Even among contemporary self-domesticated H. sapiens, individual males occasionally try to use their fighting prowess to dominate a group.
“Even among contemporary self-domesticated H. sapiens individual males occasionally try to use their fighting prowess to dominate a group (Boehm, 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boehm, 1999 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 57
- May combine two claims. 51
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLanguage-based conspiracy is the most convincing mechanism for explaining the selective pressure against individually powerful fighters.
“because it is the most convincing mechanism for explaining the selective pressure against individually powerful fighters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFacial width and brow-ridge projection have declined in H. sapiens.
“Facial width and brow-ridge projection have also declined in H. sapiens (Cieri et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cieri et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningGroup-structured culture selection possibly accelerated the process of self-domestication.
“Group-structured culture selection possibly accelerated the process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Jebel Irhoud specimens have short faces, small teeth, and reduced brow-ridges compared to pre-sapiens ancestors, making them the earliest human specimens to show features of the domestication syndrome.
“The Jebel Irhoud specimens have short faces, small teeth, and reduced brow-ridges compared to pre-sapiens ancestors, making them the earliest human specimens to show features of the domestication syndrome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hublin et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSelection has acted to reduce the propensity for reactive aggression in bonobos compared to a chimpanzee-like ancestor, such that male bonobos who use reactive aggression to achieve an alpha position by being the most effective fighter would not tend to achieve maximal fitness.
“In other words selection has acted to reduce the propensity for reactive aggression in bonobos, compared to a chimpanzee-like ancestor, such that male bonobos who use reactive aggression to achieve an alpha position by being the most effective fighter would not tend to achieve maximal fitness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The ancestral Homo species sometimes called Homo heidelbergensis lived in social communities and had dominance hierarchies typical of primates living in multi-female, multi-male groups.
- The authors state this as an assumption: In the ancestral Homo species, there was an alpha male who achieved his position by physically defeating lower-ranking males in one-on-one combat.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The alpha male dominated all females and experienced higher fitness than other males.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFeatures of the domestication syndrome were produced by selection purely for docility, i.e., for a low propensity for reactive aggression.
“Belyaev (1969) showed that features of the domestication syndrome were produced by selection purely for docility, i.e., for a low propensity for reactive aggression (Trut, 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Belyaev, 1969
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Trut, 1999 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMarean (2015) developed a version of the group selection hypothesis suggesting why selection in favor of cooperation was more intense in the origin of H. sapiens than in other Homo, pointing to increasing exploitation of dense and predictable food resources, leading to higher population density, and more aggressive defense of territories.
“Marean (2015) developed a version of this hypothesis that suggested why selection in favor of cooperation was more intense in the origin of H. sapiens than in other Homo. He pointed to increasing exploitation of dense and predictable food resources, leading to higher population density, and more aggressive defense of territories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marean, 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe explanation for selection against reactive aggression must apply only to H. sapiens, since it is the only species of Homo known to exhibit a domestication syndrome.
“The second challenge is that the explanation for selection against reactive aggression must apply only to H. sapiens, since it is the only species of Homo known to exhibit a domestication syndrome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIf the male-coalition suppression mechanism applied throughout the existence of H. sapiens, it would explain how there was selection against the best individual fighters.
“If this mechanism applied throughout the existence of H. sapiens, it would explain how there was selection against the best individual fighters [see (8) and (9) below].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The present informs the past.
- Rests on an assumption: Contemporary mobile hunter-gatherer societies offer a guide to reconstructing late Pleistocene societies.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLiving adult males with relatively narrower faces tend both to be less reactively aggressive and to be perceived as being less aggressive, to the point of being assessed as having more human-like minds.
“In support of the behavioral significance of recent anatomical changes, living adult males with relatively narrower faces tend both to be less reactively aggressive and to be perceived as being less aggressive (Carré and McCormick, 2008; Haselhuhn et al., 2015), to the point of being assessed as having more human-like minds (Deska et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe high degree of docility characteristic of humans and domesticated animals depends on a low propensity for reactive aggression.
“The high degree of docility that is characteristic of humans and domesticated animals depends on a low propensity for reactive aggression, but what relationship it has with proactive aggression, if any, is unknown (Wrangham, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wrangham, 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThere is reason to question the core assumption that success in intergroup conflict is increased by a reduction in within-group conflict.
“Finally, there is reason to question the core assumption that success in intergroup conflict is increased by a reduction in within-group conflict.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn recent cases GSCS has little relevance for genetic evolution of populations, and none for genetic evolution of the species as a whole.
“In those cases it has little relevance for genetic evolution of populations, and none for genetic evolution of the species as a whole.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningHypotheses for the evolution of increased cooperation could in theory contribute to explaining why docility evolved.
“Hypotheses for the evolution of increased cooperation could therefore in theory contribute to explaining why docility evolved (e.g., Henrich, 2016; Richerson et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningSophisticated language enabled males of low fighting prowess to cooperatively plan the execution of physically aggressive and domineering alpha males.
“Sophisticated language enabled males of low fighting prowess to cooperatively plan the execution of physically aggressive and domineering alpha males.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe earliest record of a lineage of H. sapiens comes from around 315,000 years ago from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco.
“Currently the earliest record of a lineage of H. sapiens comes from around 315,000 years ago from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco (Hublin et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hublin et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn bonobos, the alpha male ordinarily owes his position to the support of his mother rather than to his ability to fight alone, and he is not necessarily dominant to the alpha female.
“In bonobos, there is an alpha male, but he ordinarily owes his position to the support of his mother rather than to his ability to fight alone, and he is not necessarily dominant to the alpha female (Surbeck et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Surbeck et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn some human societies a coalition of the majority prevents any individuals from dominating access to preferred resources, and there are no alpha males (reverse dominance hierarchy).
“In some societies a coalition of the majority is able to prevent any individuals from dominating access to preferred resources (Boehm, 1999). In these cases, called a “reverse dominancy hierarchy” or “counter-hierarchy” there are no alpha males (Boehm, 1993).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe group selection argument does not differentiate between humans and chimpanzees, even though only humans, and not chimpanzees, have experienced selection against reactive aggression.
“The group selection argument thus does not differentiate between humans and chimpanzees, even though only humans, and not chimpanzees, have experienced selection against reactive aggression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHuman aggressiveness comes in two major forms, reactive (or impulsive) and proactive (or premeditated), each with their own distinctive neurobiology.
“Human aggressiveness has recently been argued to come in two major forms, reactive (or impulsive) and proactive (or premeditated), each with their own distinctive neurobiology (Wrangham, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wrangham, 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGroup selection has been proposed as a mechanism for promoting parochial altruism.
“Group selection has been proposed as a mechanism for promoting parochial altruism, meaning altruism restricted to “one’s own ethnic, racial, or other group” (Choi and Bowles, 2007: 636).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Choi and Bowles, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThere is no direct evidence as to whether, around the time that H. sapiens evolved, foods could no longer be collected individually, teamwork against predators became much more important, or pair-bonding began.
“For example there is no direct evidence as to whether, around the time that H. sapiens evolved, foods could no longer be collected individually, teamwork against predators became much more important, or pair-bonding began.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
PremisecitationThe argument is that cooperative breeding was a feature of the genus Homo from H. erectus onward, close to 2 million years ago.
“First, the argument made by Hrdy (2009), Burkart et al. (2009), and Burkart and van Schaik (2016) is that cooperative breeding was a feature of the genus Homo from H. erectus onward, close to 2 million years ago.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hrdy, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Burkart et al., 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Burkart and van Schaik, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningHypotheses of social selection for unaggressive partners are challenged by the predictable success of a tyrant using brute force for personal gain.
“In short, hypotheses of social selection for unaggressive partners are challenged by the predictable success of a tyrant using brute force for personal gain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMarean developed a similar scenario.
“Marean (2015) developed a similar scenario.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marean, 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSelection favored a low propensity for male aggression because offspring were thereby better protected from the father's potential violence.
“Selection favored a low propensity for male aggression because offspring were thereby better protected from the father’s potential violence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tomasello, 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIn societies with higher-status women, men were relatively short, suggesting reduced selection for male aggressiveness.
“In support, they found that in societies with higher-status women (who were presumed to have more freedom to choose their mates), men were relatively short (suggesting reduced selection for male aggressiveness).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gleeson and Kushnick, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIncreasing population density around 200,000 years ago could have been responsible for selection pressures against reactive aggression.
“Cieri et al. (2014) proposed that increasing population density around 200,000 years ago could have been responsible for selection pressures against reactive aggression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cieri et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIf group cultures in the form of social norms occurred as early as 300,000 years ago, GSCS might have contributed to selection against reactive aggression.
“Nevertheless, if group cultures in the form of social norms occurred as early as 300,000 years ago, GSCS might have contributed to selection against reactive aggression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIncreasing population density was plausibly associated with the cultural developments around 300,000 years ago.
“In favor of this general kind of idea, increasing population density was plausibly associated with the cultural developments reported by Brooks et al. (2018) around 300,000 years ago.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brooks et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe self-control hypothesis is challenged by the problems of why the sapiens lineage took a different course from other Homo, and by the problem of how increased self-control would lead to selection against domineering behaviors.
“It is challenged by the problems of why the sapiens lineage took a different course from other Homo, and by the problem of how increased self-control would lead to selection against domineering behaviors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHigher population density could have increased the pressure to exploit resources controlled by other humans, and would have selected for increased social tolerance toward unfamiliar individuals, an extension of social networks, and more sharing of acquired foods.
“They suggested that because higher population density could have increased the pressure to exploit resources controlled by other humans, it would have selected for increased social tolerance toward unfamiliar individuals, an extension of social networks, and more sharing of acquired foods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cieri et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningEffective cooperation depended on a reduction in selfishness and aggressiveness, and on a concomitant increase in sympathy and shared intentionality.
“Effective cooperation depended on a reduction in selfishness and aggressiveness, and on a concomitant increase in sympathy and shared intentionality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tomasello, 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAn alternative proposal that could have involved GSCS attributes selection against reactive aggression to the emergence of language-based conspiracy that would allow execution of aggressive individuals.
“An alternative proposal that could have involved GSCS attributes selection against reactive aggression to the emergence of language-based conspiracy that would allow execution of aggressive individuals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
PremisecitationSelf-domestication could be promoted by an increased ability for self-control leading to less use of reactive aggression.
“Based on the latter finding, Hare (2017) suggested that self-domestication could be promoted by an increased ability for self-control leading to less use of reactive aggression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hare, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenTomasello does not discuss what would stop a determined, physically powerful male from exerting his fighting ability at the expense of others in his group.
“Similar to the problem with the female mate choice hypothesis, the difficulty is that Tomasello does not discuss what would stop a determined, physically powerful male from exerting his fighting ability at the expense of others in his group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningApplying the hypothesis specifically to self-domestication, selected effects could in theory include reduced tendencies for reactive aggression, on the traditional premise that groups in which males competed more aggressively with group members would be less effective at intergroup conflict.
“Applying the hypothesis specifically to the problem of self-domestication, selected effects could in theory include reduced tendencies for reactive aggression, on the traditional premise that groups in which males competed more aggressively with group members would be less effective at intergroup conflict (e.g., Zhang et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe cooperative breeding proposal has no special claim on events surrounding the evolution of H. sapiens around 300,000 years ago: it does not help explain the evidence that H. sapiens underwent a singular form of self-domestication not experienced by other Homo species.
“Their proposal therefore has no special claim on events surrounding the evolution of H. sapiens around 300,000 years ago: it does not help explain the evidence that H. sapiens underwent a singular form of self-domestication not experienced by other Homo species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn experimental studies with captive primates, population density is sometimes associated with reduced aggression and increased tolerance.
“In experimental studies with captive primates, population density is sometimes associated with reduced aggression and increased tolerance (Aureli et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aureli et al., 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningSuch findings mean that a specific theory is needed to explain why intergroup conflict would have led to reactive aggression being selected against more intensely in Homo ∼300,000 years ago than happens in other primates.
“Such findings mean that a specific theory is needed to explain why intergroup conflict would have led to reactive aggression being selected against more intensely in Homo,∼300,000 years ago, than happens in other primates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTomasello presented an explanation for the evolution of morality that included a proposal for the reduction of aggressiveness in H. sapiens, called the interdependence hypothesis.
“This general idea has been elaborated particularly clearly by Tomasello (2016), who presented an explanation for the evolution of morality that included a proposal for the reduction of aggressiveness in H. sapiens. Tomasello called it the “interdependence hypothesis.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tomasello, 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn primates, absolute brain size predicts neuron number and is strongly correlated with the ability to inhibit prepotent responses.
“In primates, absolute brain size predicts neuron number and is strongly correlated with the ability to inhibit prepotent responses (MacLean et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites MacLean et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGene-culture coevolution would then include selection in favor of an increasingly parochial-altruistic psychology: tendencies for docility and conformity would be favored because individuals with those characteristics would readily acquire group norms.
“Gene-culture coevolution would then include selection in favor of an increasingly parochial-altruistic psychology: tendencies for docility and conformity would be favored because individuals with those characteristics would readily acquire group norms (Richerson et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Richerson et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFemale choice of less aggressive males as mates was proposed as a mechanism that could promote self-domestication, because females who choose less aggressive males can benefit by their mates' greater investment in shared parenting effort.
“Female choice of less aggressive males as mates was proposed by Cieri et al. (2014) and Gleeson and Kushnick (2018) as a mechanism that could promote self-domestication, because females who choose less aggressive males can benefit by their mates’ greater investment in shared parenting effort.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cieri et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gleeson and Kushnick, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIsland populations of rodents, lizards and birds tend to live at higher density than their continental relatives and also show low levels of aggression.
“Island populations tend to live at higher density than their continental relatives, and also to show low levels of aggression (Stamps and Buechner, 1985).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stamps and Buechner, 1985
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccording to the interdependence hypothesis, the initial influence on the road to a human style of morality occurred around 400,000 years ago when there was a disappearance of individually obtainable foods.
“According to the interdependence hypothesis the initial influence on the road to a human style of morality occurred around 400,000 years ago when there was a “disappearance of individually obtainable foods” (Tomasello, 2016: 136).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tomasello, 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningLike a male lion feeding off the kills brought down by females, the determinedly aggressive and effective fighter would continue to have high fitness thanks to his ability to commandeer food, mates or other resources from others in the group.
“Like a male lion Panthera leo feeding off the kills brought down by females, the determinedly aggressive and effective fighter would continue to have high fitness thanks to his ability to commandeer food, mates or other resources from others in the group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe despotic male would improve his lot by seizing the choicest foods that others produced: his physical dominance would allow it.
“The despotic male would improve his lot by seizing the choicest foods that others produced: his physical dominance would allow it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe only obvious solution would be that the tyrant is constrained by coalitions that can physically rein in his power.
“The only obvious solution would be that the tyrant is constrained by coalitions that can physically rein in his power, similar to the solution for social selection by female mate choice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe tribal social instincts hypothesis suggests that groups in which there were norms of parochial altruism would have been especially successful in intergroup competition.
“This hypothesis suggests that groups in which there were norms of parochial altruism would have been especially successful in intergroup competition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Richerson and Boyd, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIncreased social tolerance implies a reduced propensity for reactive aggression.
“Increased social tolerance implies a reduced propensity for reactive aggression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe notion of a relevant ecological change is entirely speculative.
“Thus the notion of a relevant ecological change is entirely speculative.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEffective population size of H. sapiens fell from 200,000 years ago to 50,000-30,000 years ago, suggesting a mismatch between cultural development and population density.
“On the other hand, genetic data indicate that effective population size of H. sapiens fell from 200,000 years ago to 50,000–30,000 years ago, suggesting a mismatch between cultural development and population density (Steele and Weaver, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Steele and Weaver, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWhile such selection is theoretically possible, no cases have yet been documented of GSCS leading to genetic change.
“While such selection is theoretically possible, to my knowledge no cases have yet been documented of GSCS leading to genetic change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCooperative breeding became an important feature of early Homo society and selected for increased social tolerance.
“Burkart et al. (2009), Hrdy (2009), and Burkart and van Schaik (2016) proposed that cooperative breeding, a social system in which individuals help rear others’ offspring at a cost to their own reproductive effort, became an important feature of early Homo society and selected for increased social tolerance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Burkart et al., 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hrdy, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Burkart and van Schaik, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCoalitionary support is needed to enable partner choice to be effective, but coalitionary support has not featured to date in the social selection hypotheses.
“Coalitionary support is needed to enable partner choice to be effective, but coalitionary support has not featured to date in the social selection hypotheses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLanguage-based conspiracy appears to be a vital prerequisite for controlling a would-be despot in a mobile hunter-gatherer society, and seems likely to have been equally important in the past.
“For those reasons, language-based conspiracy appears to be a vital prerequisite for controlling a would-be despot in a mobile hunter-gatherer society, and seems likely to have been equally important in the past.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn humans, groups conspire against resented tyrants; in mobile hunter-gatherers plans are made and tyrants are executed.
“In humans, by contrast, groups conspire against resented tyrants: in mobile hunter-gatherers plans are made and tyrants are executed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLethal weaponry would have facilitated executions.
“Lethal weaponry would also have facilitated executions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationExperimental studies of captive primates show that high population density can lead to an increase in the rate of aggression, or can have no effect.
“and experimental studies of captive primates show that high population density can lead to an increase in the rate of aggression, or can have no effect (Cordoni and Palagi, 2007; Crast et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cordoni and Palagi, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Crast et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe lethal weapons hypothesis has the merit of suggesting that the use of lethal weapons would lead to selection against reactive aggression.
“Since alpha-males would have maintained their position by reacting violently to challengers, this hypothesis has the merit of suggesting that the use of lethal weapons would lead to selection against reactive aggression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe time when language became sufficiently sophisticated that subordinate males could confidently plan to kill a better fighter is speculative.
“As for language-based conspiracy (9), the time when language became sufficiently sophisticated that subordinate males could confidently plan to kill a better fighter is speculative.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn groups that have egalitarian male dominance hierarchies, individual choice of unaggressive mates and unaggressive task partners are plausible influences on the reduction of reactive aggression.
“In groups that have egalitarian male dominance hierarchies both ideas are plausible influences on the reduction of reactive aggression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOldowan stone manuports were possibly lethal throwing weapons in the Lower Pleistocene.
“Oldowan stone manuports were possibly lethal throwing weapons in the Lower Pleistocene (Gintis et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gintis et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe evolution of this newly sophisticated cognitive ability would have led subordinates to socially select against aggressive fighters, creating a reverse dominance hierarchy.
“The evolution of this newly sophisticated cognitive ability would have led subordinates to socially select against aggressive fighters, creating a reverse dominance hierarchy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAcross species, the precise composition of domestication syndromes is unpredictable, undermining confidence in using them to infer selection against reactive aggression; and the biological mechanisms responsible for producing domestication syndromes are uncertain.
“Against this idea, across species the precise composition of domestication syndromes is unpredictable, a fact that undermines confidence in using them to infer selection against reactive aggression; and the biological mechanisms responsible for producing domestication syndromes are uncertain (Sánchez-Villagra et al., 2016; Sánchez-Villagra and van Schaik, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLanguage-based conspiracy is not present in chimpanzees: subordinate chimpanzees cannot plan premeditated take-downs of alpha males, which probably partly explains why there has apparently been no selection against reactive aggression in this species.
“Language-based conspiracy is not present in chimpanzees: subordinate chimpanzees cannot plan premeditated take-downs of alpha males, which probably partly explains why there has apparently been no selection against reactive aggression in this species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationOnce reactive aggression started to be selected against, expected effects would have included, as a by-product, increased social tolerance and improved abilities to communicate and cooperate.
“Once reactive aggression started to be selected against, expected effects would have included, as a by-product, increased social tolerance and improved abilities to communicate and cooperate (Hare, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hare, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationSufficient execution of Pleistocene despots would have led to selection against reactive aggression.
“Sufficient execution of Pleistocene despots would have led to selection against reactive aggression (Wrangham, 2018, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wrangham, 2018, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningExecutions can be planned using proactive aggression, so executioners arrange to kill a victim in a circumstance in which fighting back is essentially impossible, and killers incur very low costs.
“An important feature of executions is that they can be planned using proactive aggression. This means that the executioners arrange to kill a victim in a circumstance in which fighting back is essentially impossible. As a result, the killers incur very low costs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe language-based conspiracy hypothesis can explain why reactive aggression would have been selected against, why this occurred only in H. sapiens, and why reactive aggression has continued to decline.
“In sum, the language-based conspiracy hypothesis can explain why reactive aggression would have been selected against, why this occurred only in H. sapiens, and (given that capital punishment was recorded into contemporary times among mobile hunter-gatherers) why reactive aggression has continued to decline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWith weapon use already in place, capital punishment would have been relatively easy.
“With weapon use already in place, capital punishment would have been relatively easy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationNo other selective pressures are known to produce a domestication syndrome, and the resemblances that humans show to domesticated animals include physiological, behavioral and cognitive traits in addition to reduced aggression and a derived anatomy.
“Nevertheless, no other selective pressures are known to produce a domestication syndrome, and the resemblances that humans show to domesticated animals include physiological, behavioral and cognitive traits in addition to reduced aggression and a derived anatomy (Hare, 2017; Wrangham, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hare, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wrangham, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe population density hypothesis fails to detail any process responsible for selection directly against alpha-male-style behavior.
“The population density hypothesis also fails to detail any process responsible for selection directly against alpha-male-style behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenCurrent evidence about the evolutionary history of human population density undermines any easy correlations, and the relationship between population density and rates of aggression in primates is inconsistent.
“Current evidence about the evolutionary history of human population density, however, undermines any easy correlations, and the relationship between population density and rates of aggression in primates is inconsistent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe cooperative breeding hypothesis could in theory account for reduced aggressiveness, although the evidence for cooperative breeders being unaggressive is inconsistent at best.
“The cooperative breeding hypothesis for human social evolution (6) could in theory account for reduced aggressiveness, although the evidence for cooperative breeders being unaggressive is inconsistent at best.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIncreasing population density is associated with reduced aggressiveness in island species, and could in theory play a role in H. sapiens' self-domestication.
“Increasing population density (7) is associated with reduced aggressiveness in island species, and could in theory play a role in H. sapiens’ self-domestication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe spread of the new style of hierarchy could have occurred by individual learning or by selection of group-cultures, and would have paved the way for diverse selection pressures to additionally influence the evolution of characteristically human social traits.
“The spread of the new style of hierarchy could have occurred by individual learning or by selection of group-cultures, and would have paved the way for diverse selection pressures, as shown in Table 1, to additionally influence the evolution of the characteristically human social traits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA biological hypothesis for the production of domestication syndromes has received important support, including evidence that genetic variants underlying self-domestication occur in H. sapiens but not in H. neanderthalensis or Denisovans.
“Furthermore a biological hypothesis for the production of domestication syndromes (Wilkins et al., 2014) has received important support (Wilkins, 2017; Pendleton et al., 2018), including evidence that genetic variants underlying self-domestication occur in H. sapiens but not in H. neanderthalensis or Denisovans (Theofanopoulou et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCapital punishment has been recorded among mobile hunter-gatherers in every continent, and aggressive bullies are a common type of victim.
“This scenario is supported by the fact that capital punishment has been recorded among mobile hunter-gatherers in every continent, and that aggressive bullies are a common type of victim (Boehm, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boehm, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLethal weaponry does not appear to be associated with H. sapiens as tightly or as uniquely as theory would demand, since it has likely been used for a long time before the evolution of H. sapiens, as well as in other species of Homo.
“However, it does not appear to be associated with H. sapiens as tightly or as uniquely as theory would demand, since it has likely been used for a long time before the evolution of H. sapiens, as well as in other species of Homo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe use of lethal weapons was probably widespread from H. erectus onward, and would have facilitated the deliberate killing of conspecifics.
“In sum, the use of lethal weapons was probably widespread from H. erectus onward, and would have facilitated the deliberate killing of conspecifics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGenetic group selection and group-structured culture selection do not account for reduced reactive aggression in H. sapiens in their current form, partly because in humans and other primates effective intergroup conflict is not necessarily associated with reduced within-group aggression.
“I concluded that they do not do so in their current form, partly because in humans, and other primates, effective intergroup conflict is not necessarily associated with reduced within-group aggression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
InterpretationcitationLinguistic ability was significantly more sophisticated in H. sapiens than in H. neanderthalensis or other Homo species.
“The prediction made by this hypothesis is that linguistic ability was significantly more sophisticated in H. sapiens than in H. neanderthalensis or other Homo species. That idea is plausible (Tattersall, 2016), though hotly debated (Dediu and Levinson, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Tattersall, 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dediu and Levinson, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBecause proactive and reactive aggression involve different neurobiological mechanisms, under a selective regime of alpha males being executed, the propensity for proactive reaction can remain high while the propensity for reactive aggression declines over evolutionary time.
“The fact that proactive and reactive aggression involve different neurobiological mechanisms means that under a selective regime of alpha males being executed, the propensity for proactive reaction can remain high while the propensity for reactive aggression declines over evolutionary time (Wrangham, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wrangham, 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe ethnographic record of capital punishment is thin; the practice has tended to disappear very rapidly.
“Unfortunately, however, the ethnographic record of capital punishment is thin: the practice has tended to disappear very rapidly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenLethal weaponry has undoubtedly played an important role in human life.
“Lethal weaponry (8) has undoubtedly played an important role in human life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe group selection argument for parochial altruism does not explain behavioral differences between humans and chimpanzees; and the culture selection argument for tribal social instincts is challenged by the origin of H. sapiens being so early that the requisite cultural abilities may not have been present.
“The group selection argument for parochial altruism also does not explain behavioral differences between humans and chimpanzees; and the culture selection argument for tribal social instincts is challenged by the origin of H. sapiens being so early that the requisite cultural abilities may not have been present.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationChimpanzees cannot communicate to others that they wish to kill a particular individual, nor justify their desire, find out if their partner feels the same way, or plan to meet at a future time and place to carry out the deed.
“Chimpanzees cannot communicate to others that they wish to kill a particular individual, let alone justify their desire, find out if their partner feels the same way, or plan to meet at some future time at a specified place in order to carry out the deed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The ancestral Homo species sometimes called Homo heidelbergensis lived in social communities and had dominance hierarchies typical of primates living in multi-female, multi-male groups.
“I follow the assumption (e.g., Gintis et al., 2015) that this ancestral Homo species, sometimes called Homo heidelbergensis, would have lived in social communities and would have had dominance hierarchies typical of primates living in multi-female, multi-male groups.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the ancestral Homo species, there was an alpha male who achieved his position by physically defeating lower-ranking males in one-on-one combat.
“Specifically there would have been an alpha male who achieved his position by physically defeating lower-ranking males in one-on-one combat.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The alpha male dominated all females and experienced higher fitness than other males.
“The alpha would also have dominated all females, and would have predictably experienced higher fitness than other males.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The present informs the past.
“The simplest hypothesis is based on the assumption that the present informs the past.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Contemporary mobile hunter-gatherer societies offer a guide to reconstructing late Pleistocene societies.
“Similarly, the societies of contemporary mobile hunter-gatherers offer a guide to reconstructing late Pleistocene societies.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A female mid-Pleistocene Homo would not have had the physical ability to freely express her mate choice.
“Assuming that she would not have had the physical ability to freely express her choice, she would have had to rely on coalitionary help.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Humans benefit by cooperating in gathering, hunting, warfare and other tasks.
“On the assumption that humans benefit by cooperating in gathering, hunting, warfare and other tasks, social selection has likely been important in promoting altruistic, and non-competitive behavior within groups (Nesse, 2009).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The anatomical signal of a domestication syndrome in H. sapiens is a reliable indicator of reduced reactive aggression.
“The conceptual framework assumes that the anatomical signal of a domestication syndrome in H. sapiens is a reliable indicator of reduced reactive aggression.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modern humans have markedly reduced intraspecific reactive aggression when compared to extant primates.
“In conjunction with findings that our species has markedly reduced intraspecific reactive aggression when compared to extant primates, this has helped to spur research into the hypothesis that, relative to archaic hominins, modern humans have undergone positive selection for a reduction in reactive aggression towards each other [13].”
From Gene expression profiles underlying aggressive behavior in the prefrontal cortex of cattle (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex
Darwin, C. R. (1872) · D. Appleton and company eBooks · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.2112 · Cited by 2,440 · see citing works
Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection.
WEST, S. A., GRIFFIN, A. S., & GARDNER, A. (2007) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01258.x · Cited by 1,889 · see citing works
New fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco and the pan-African origin of Homo sapiens.
Hublin, J.-J., Ben-Ncer, A., Bailey, S. E., Freidline, S. E., Neubauer, S., Skinner, M. M., Bergmann, I., Le Cabec, A., Benazzi, S., Harvati, K., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22336 · Cited by 1,347 · see citing works
The Coevolution of Parochial Altruism and War
Choi, J.-K., & Bowles, S. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1144237 · Cited by 1,227 · see citing works
Henrich, J. (2016) · doi:10.1515/9781400873296 · Cited by 1,002 · see citing works
The variation of animals and plants under domestication /
Darwin, C. R. (1883) · D. Appleton and company eBooks · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.87899 · Cited by 998 · see citing works
A Natural History of Human Morality
Tomasello, M. (2016) · doi:10.4159/9780674915855 · Cited by 924 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The ability to conduct planned executions means that the killers must share explicit intentions with each other, a capacity that is unique to humans (Tomasello, 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialWoodburn, J. (1982) · Man · doi:10.2307/2801707 · Cited by 918 · see citing works
Body mass and encephalization in Pleistocene Homo.
Ruff, C. B., Trinkaus, E., & Holliday, T. W. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387173a0 · Cited by 896 · see citing works
Lower Palaeolithic hunting spears from Germany
Thieme, H. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/385807a0 · Cited by 834 · see citing works
The evolution of self-control.
MacLean, E. L., Hare, B., Nunn, C. L., Addessi, E., Amici, F., Anderson, R. C., Aureli, F., Baker, J. M., Bania, A. E., Barnard, A. M., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323533111 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Moral origins: the evolution of virtue, altruism, and shame
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-0864 · Cited by 774 · see citing works
A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism.
Simon, H. A. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2270480 · Cited by 769 · see citing works
Wilkins, A. S., Wrangham, R. W., & Fitch, W. T. (2014) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.114.165423 · Cited by 751 · see citing works
Self-citationEgalitarian Behavior and Reverse Dominance Hierarchy [and Comments and Reply]
Boehm, C., Barclay, H. B., Dentan, R. K., Dupre, M.-C., Hill, J. D., Kent, S., Knauft, B. M., Otterbein, K. F., & Rayner, S. (1993) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/204166 · Cited by 675 · see citing works
Cooperative Breeding and Human Cognitive Evolution
Burkart, J. M., Hrdy, S. B., & Van Schaik, C. P. (2009) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20222 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
Richerson, P., Baldini, R., Bell, A. V., Demps, K., Frost, K., Hillis, V., Mathew, S., Newton, E. K., Naar, N., Newson, L., et al. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1400106x · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Early canid domestication: the farm-fox experiment.
Trut, L. (1999) · American Scientist · doi:10.1511/1999.2.160 · Cited by 626 · see citing works
Hare, B., Wobber, V., & Wrangham, R. (2012) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.007 · Cited by 613 · see citing works
Self-citationCatching Fire. How Cooking Made Us Human
Williams, P. (2010) · Nutrition & Dietetics · doi:10.1111/j.1747-0080.2010.01432.x · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding
Hwong, A. (2010) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.61.10.1050 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Lethal aggression in Pan is better explained by adaptive strategies than human impacts
Wilson, M. L., Boesch, C., Fruth, B., Furuichi, T., Gilby, I. C., Hashimoto, C., Hobaiter, C. L., Hohmann, G., Itoh, N., Koops, K., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13727 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Self-citationCarré, J. M., & McCormick, C. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0873 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Survival of the Friendliest: <i>Homo sapiens</i> Evolved via Selection for Prosociality
Hare, B. (2017) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044201 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Dediu, D., & Levinson, S. C. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00397 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: tolerance constraints on cooperation.
Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.09.018 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Long-distance stone transport and pigment use in the earliest Middle Stone Age.
Brooks, A. S., Yellen, J. E., Potts, R., Behrensmeyer, A. K., Deino, A. L., Leslie, D. E., Ambrose, S. H., Ferguson, J. R., d’Errico, F., Zipkin, A. M., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao2646 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Two types of aggression in human evolution.
Wrangham, R. W. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1713611115 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution
Wrangham, R. W. (2019) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Self-citationComparative rates of violence in chimpanzees and humans
Wrangham, R. W., Wilson, M. L., & Muller, M. N. (2006) · Primates · doi:10.1007/s10329-005-0140-1 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Self-citationMale dominance rank and reproductive success in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii.
Wroblewski, E. E., Murray, C. M., Keele, B. F., Schumacher-Stankey, J. C., Hahn, B. H., & Pusey, A. E. (2009) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.014 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Sexual selection in wild baboons: from mating opportunities to paternity success.
Alberts, S. C., Buchan, J. C., & Altmann, J. (2006) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.05.001 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
The Territorial Defense Hypothesis and the Ecology of Insular Vertebrates
Stamps, J. A., & Buechner, M. (1985) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/414314 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Surbeck, M., Mundry, R., & Hohmann, G. (2011) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1572 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Agonistic relations among Kanyawara chimpanzees
Muller, M. N. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511606397.012 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Sexual Coercion in Primates and Humans
(2009) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674054349 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Craniofacial feminization, social tolerance, and the origins of behavioral modernity
Cieri, R. L., Churchill, S. E., Franciscus, R. G., Tan, J., & Hare, B. (2014) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/677209 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Sánchez-Villagra, M. R., Geiger, M., & Schneider, R. A. (2016) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.160107 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Wrangham (2014) · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105113 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Human domestication reconsidered.
Leach, H. M. (2003) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/368119 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
The Evolution of Human Ultrasociality
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (1998) · Indoctrinability, Ideology and Warfare · doi:10.2307/jj.7079921.9 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Archaeology: The milk revolution
Curry, A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/500020a · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Self-domestication in Homo sapiens: Insights from comparative genomics
Theofanopoulou, C., Gastaldon, S., O’Rourke, T., Samuels, B. D., Messner, A., Martins, P. T., Delogu, F., Alamri, S., & Boeckx, C. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185306 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
War, Socialization, and Interpersonal Violence
Ember, C. R., & Ember, M. (1994) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002794038004002 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior
BOEHM, C. (1999) · doi:10.4159/9780674028449 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Men’s facial width-to-height ratio predicts aggression: a meta-analysis.
Haselhuhn, M. P., Ormiston, M. E., & Wong, E. M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122637 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Sexual coercion by male chimpanzees shows that female choice may be more apparent than real
Muller, M. N., Thompson, M. E., Kahlenberg, S. M., & Wrangham, R. W. (2010) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1093-y · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Self-citationPendleton, A. L., Shen, F., Taravella, A. M., Emery, S., Veeramah, K. R., Boyko, A. R., & Kidd, J. M. (2018) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-018-0535-2 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
An evolutionary anthropological perspective on modern human origins.
Marean, C. W. (2015) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-025954 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Humans are not cooperative breeders but practice biocultural reproduction
Bogin, B., Bragg, J., & Kuzawa, C. (2014) · Annals of Human Biology · doi:10.3109/03014460.2014.923938 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Sexually Coercive Male Chimpanzees Sire More Offspring
Feldblum, J. T., Wroblewski, E. E., Rudicell, R. S., Hahn, B. H., Paiva, T., Çetinkaya-Rundel, M., Pusey, A. E., & Gilby, I. C. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.039 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Surbeck, M., Boesch, C., Crockford, C., et al. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.040 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Evaluating the self‐domestication hypothesis of human evolution
Sánchez‐Villagra, M. R., & van Schaik, C. P. (2019) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.21777 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Postcranial remains and the origin of modern humans
Pearson, O. M. (2000) · Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews · doi:10.1002/1520-6505(2000)9:6 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
An evolutionary theory of large‐scale human warfare: Group‐structured cultural selection
Zefferman, M. R., & Mathew, S. (2015) · Evolutionary Anthropology (print) · doi:10.1002/evan.21439 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Competence and the Evolutionary Origins of Status and Power in Humans
Chapais, B. (2015) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-015-9227-6 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Oxytocin promotes coordinated out-group attack during intergroup conflict in humans
Zhang, H., Gross, J., De Dreu, C., & Ma, Y. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.40698 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Tamarins: Insights into monogamous and non‐monogamous single female social and breeding systems
Garber, P. A., Porter, L. M., Spross, J., & Fiore, A. D. (2015) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.22370 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Dubuc, C., Ruiz-Lambides, A., & Widdig, A. (2014) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/aru052 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Facing humanness: facial width-to-height ratio predicts ascriptions of humanity.
Deska, J. C., Lloyd, E. P., & Hugenberg, K. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000110 · Cited by 71 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, 2015), to the point of being assessed as having more humanlike minds (Deska et al., 2018).”
BackgroundGenetic differentiation and the evolution of cooperation in chimpanzees and humans.
Langergraber, K., Schubert, G., Rowney, C., Wrangham, R., Zommers, Z., & Vigilant, L. (2011) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2592 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
de Waal, F. B. M., Aureli, F., & Judge, P. G. (2000) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0500-76 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Human uniqueness-self-interest and social cooperation
Okada, D., & Bingham, P. M. (2008) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.041 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Gintis, H., van Schaik, C., & Boehm, C. (2015) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/681217 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding? A critical appraisal
Thornton, A., & McAuliffe, K. (2015) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/jzo.12198 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
EIGHT CRITICISMS NOT TO MAKE ABOUT GROUP SELECTION
Eldakar, O. T., & Wilson, D. S. (2011) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01290.x · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Phenotypic correlates of male reproductive success in western gorillas
Breuer, T., Robbins, A. M., Boesch, C., & Robbins, M. M. (2012) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.01.006 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Patterns of paternity and group fission in wild multimale mountain gorilla groups.
Nsubuga, A. M., Robbins, M. M., Boesch, C., & Vigilant, L. (2008) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20740 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Zoon politikon: The evolutionary origins of human socio-political systems
Gintis, H., van Schaik, C., & Boehm, C. (2019) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2018.01.007 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Male Violence and Sexual Intimidation in a Wild Primate Society
Baniel, A., Cowlishaw, G., & Huchard, É. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.013 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Domesticated: evolution in a man-made world
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.192438 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Revisiting the consequences of cooperative breeding
Burkart, J. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (2016) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/jzo.12322 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
The effect of intergroup competition on intragroup affiliation in primates
Majolo, B., Vizioli, A. D. B., & Lehmann, J. (2016) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.01.009 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Revisiting two hypotheses on the “domestication syndrome” in light of genomic data.
Wilkins, A. S. (2017) · Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding · doi:10.18699/vj17.262 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Social Selection and the Origins of Culture
Nesse, R. M. (2009) · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Globularization and domestication.
Benítez-Burraco, A., Theofanopoulou, C., & Boeckx, C. (2018) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-016-9399-7 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
A tentative framework for the acquisition of language and modern human cognition.
Tattersall (2016) · PubMed · doi:10.4436/jass.94030 · Cited by 40 · cited 1× · see citing works
“That idea is plausible (Tattersall, 2016), though hotly debated (Dediu and Levinson, 2013).”
BackgroundCordoni, G., & Palagi, E. (2007) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.121.2.171 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Cafazzo, S., Lazzaroni, M., & Marshall‐Pescini, S. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.2707 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Oltenacu, E. A. B. (2004) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781482276664-89 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Agnvall, B., Bélteky, J., & Jensen, P. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03236-4 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Gleeson, B. T., & Kushnick, G. (2018) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.23642 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Fundamental problems with the cooperative breeding hypothesis. A reply to Burkart & van Schaik
Thornton, A., McAuliffe, K., Dall, S. R. X., Fernández‐Duque, E., Garber, P. A., & Young, A. J. (2016) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/jzo.12351 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
The Ultimate Coercive Sanction: A Cross-Cultural Study of Capital Punishment.
Hoebel, E. A., & Otterbein, K. F. (1988) · Man · doi:10.2307/2802859 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
3. Equal, Similar, but Different: Convergent Bonobos and Conserved Chimpanzees
Hare, B. A., & Wrangham, R. W. (2017) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674982642-003 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Effects of Extra-Somatic Weapons on the Evolution of Human Cooperation towards Non-Kin
Phillips, T. J., Li, J., & Kendall, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095742 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Crast, J., Bloomsmith, M. A., & Jonesteller, T. (2015) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.22430 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Steele, 2014, Comment on Cieri et al. Craniofacial feminization, social tolerance, and the origins of behavioral modernity., Curr. Anthropol., 55, 434, 10.1086/677209 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Comparing wolves and dogs: current status and implications for human ‘self-domestication’
Range, F., & Marshall-Pescini, S. (2022) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2022.01.003 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Gene expression profiles underlying aggressive behavior in the prefrontal cortex of cattle
Eusebi, P. G., Sevane, N., O’Rourke, T., Pizarro, M., Boeckx, C., & Dunner, S. (2021) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-021-07505-5 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality
Windzio, M. (2026) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-026-09531-2
- Authors
- Wrangham, R. W.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wrangham, Richard W.
- ORCID
- Wrangham, Richard W.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2019-08-20
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 1914-1914
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6710405
- OpenAlex
- W2964997421
- Semantic Scholar
- ea0a5fe0bd00bdf0ef152583c12b46207efe91e4
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Kempe Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- self-domestication, reactive aggression, human evolution, domestication syndrome, hunter-gatherers, group selection, cultural group selection, female mate choice, self-control, cooperative breeding, population density, lethal weapons, collective intentionality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review