Effects of Water Soluble Carbohydrate Content on Ensiling Characteristics, Chemical Composition and in Vitro Gas Production of Forage Millet and Forage Sorghum Silages
Abstract
A study was conducted to determine effects of water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) concentration on ensiling characteristics, chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of forage millet and forage sorghum. Two cultivars (regular and high WSC content) of each forage were harvested at late vegetative stage and ensiled in mini-silos for 0, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 48d. Ensiled forages went through a rapid fermentation as indicated by a sharp decline in pH during the first 2d of ensiling. Between day 0 and 8 post-ensiling, pH was higher (P<0.05) for ensiled millet than ensiled sorghum forages and was lower for high WSC than regular cultivars. Lactic acid concentration was higher (P<0.05) in high WSC than in regular cultivars and was not affected by forage type. Chemical composition of the 45-d silages showed that forage millet silages contain more (P<0.05) neutral (aNDF) and acid detergent fiber than forage sorghum silages. Fiber fractions were not affected by WSC content except for lignin(sa), which was higher (P<0.05) for regular versus high WSC cultivars. Soluble and non-protein N were higher (P<0.05) in forage millet than forage sorghum silages and were higher for high WSC versus normal cultivars. In vitro gas production, degradation rate and volatile fatty acid production were not affected by forage type but were higher (P<0.05) for high WSC versus normal cultivars. In vitro dry matter and aNDF digestibilities were higher for forage sorghum versus forage millet silages, and were higher for high WSC versus normal cultivars. High WSC content improved ensiling characteristics of both forages, but the effect was more pronounced for forage sorghum than for forage millet. Based on chemical composition and in vitro data, we conclude that the feeding value of forage sorghum silage is superior to that of forage millet silage when harvested at the same stage of physiological development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gas is produced from residual oxygen respiration and from fermentation of forage carbohydrates to acetate and butyrate; propionate fermentation occurs only from buffering of VFA.
“Gas is produced from residual oxygen respiration, as well as when forage carbohydrates are fermented to acetate and butyrate, with fermentation to propionate occurring only from buffering of VFA [51].”
From The Effects of Short-Time Delayed Sealing on Fermentation, Aerobic Stability and Chemical Composition on Maize Silages (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Amer, S., Hassanat, F., Berthiaume, R., Seguin, P., & Mustafa, A. F.
- Affiliations
- Collège MacDonald (CA)
- Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Mustafa, A.F.
- Venue
- Animal Feed Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 177
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 23-29
- ISSN
- 0377-8401 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976058145
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Animal Feed Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
- Keywords
- water-soluble carbohydrates, forage sorghum, silage fermentation, silage pH, lactic acid, fiber fractions, lignin, non-protein nitrogen, in vitro gas production, in vitro digestibility, volatile fatty acids, forage quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
