Cited by 251Animal Genetics and ReproductionReproductive Biology and FertilitySperm and Testicular Function

A review on reproductive biotechnologies for conservation of endangered mammalian species

Andrabi, S.M.H., Maxwell, W.M.C.·2007·Animal Reproduction Science

Abstract

This review describes the use of modern reproductive biotechnologies or assisted reproductive techniques (ART) including artificial insemination, embryo transfer/sexing, in vitro fertilization, gamete/embryo micromanipulation, semen sexing, genome resource banking, and somatic cell nuclear transfer (cloning) in conservation programs for endangered mammalian species. Such biotechnologies allow more offspring to be obtained from selected parents to ensure genetic diversity and may reduce the interval between generations. However, the application of reproductive biotechnologies for endangered free-living mammals is rarer than for endangered domestic breeds. Progress in ART for non-domestic species will continue at a slow pace due to limited resources, but also because the management and conservation of endangered species is biologically quite complex. In practice, current reproductive biotechnologies are species-specific or inefficient for many endangered animals because of insufficient knowledge on basic reproduction like estrous cycle, seasonality, structural anatomy, gamete physiology and site for semen deposition or embryo transfer of non-domestic species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.07.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assistive reproductive technologies are not widely available nor studied for many endangered species in ex situ conservation breeding programs.

    “While more widespread adoption of assistive reproductive technologies (ARTs) would aid in mitigating the need for transfers, ARTs are not widely available nor studied for many endangered species that are part of ex situ conservation breeding programs [32,34].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrabi, S. M. H., & Maxwell, W. M. C.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Andrabi, S.M.H.
Venue
Animal Reproduction Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
99
Issue
3-4
Pages
223-243
ISSN
0378-4320 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006738368
Cited by
251
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Animal Reproduction Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
Keywords
reproductive biotechnology, assisted reproduction, endangered mammals, wildlife conservation, artificial insemination, embryo transfer, in vitro fertilization, embryo micromanipulation, somatic cell nuclear transfer, cloning, genetic diversity
MeSH terms
Animals, Biotechnology, Conservation of Natural Resources, Mammals, Reproduction, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review