A review on reproductive biotechnologies for conservation of endangered mammalian species
Abstract
This review describes the use of modern reproductive biotechnologies or assisted reproductive techniques (ART) including artificial insemination, embryo transfer/sexing, in vitro fertilization, gamete/embryo micromanipulation, semen sexing, genome resource banking, and somatic cell nuclear transfer (cloning) in conservation programs for endangered mammalian species. Such biotechnologies allow more offspring to be obtained from selected parents to ensure genetic diversity and may reduce the interval between generations. However, the application of reproductive biotechnologies for endangered free-living mammals is rarer than for endangered domestic breeds. Progress in ART for non-domestic species will continue at a slow pace due to limited resources, but also because the management and conservation of endangered species is biologically quite complex. In practice, current reproductive biotechnologies are species-specific or inefficient for many endangered animals because of insufficient knowledge on basic reproduction like estrous cycle, seasonality, structural anatomy, gamete physiology and site for semen deposition or embryo transfer of non-domestic species.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Assistive reproductive technologies are not widely available nor studied for many endangered species in ex situ conservation breeding programs.
“While more widespread adoption of assistive reproductive technologies (ARTs) would aid in mitigating the need for transfers, ARTs are not widely available nor studied for many endangered species that are part of ex situ conservation breeding programs [32,34].”
From The Concept of Agency, Animal Wellbeing, and the Practical Realities of Ex Situ Breeding Programs in Zoos and Aquariums (2024) · cites this paper as [34]
Cites
Johnston, L. A., Parrish, J. J., Monson, R., Leibfried-Rutledge, L., Susko-Parrish, J. L., Northey, D. L., Rutledge, J. J., & Simmons, L. G. (1994) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/jrf.0.1000131 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Norman, M., & Brando, S. (2024) · Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens · doi:10.3390/jzbg5040038 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“While more widespread adoption of assistive reproductive technologies (ARTs) would aid in mitigating the need for transfers, ARTs are not widely available nor studied for many endangered species that are part of ex situ conservation breeding programs [32,34].”
- Authors
- Andrabi, S. M. H., & Maxwell, W. M. C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Andrabi, S.M.H.
- ORCID
- Andrabi, S.M.H.
- Venue
- Animal Reproduction Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 223-243
- ISSN
- 0378-4320 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006738368
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Animal Reproduction Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Keywords
- reproductive biotechnology, assisted reproduction, endangered mammals, wildlife conservation, artificial insemination, embryo transfer, in vitro fertilization, embryo micromanipulation, somatic cell nuclear transfer, cloning, genetic diversity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biotechnology, Conservation of Natural Resources, Mammals, Reproduction, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review