Factors influencing breeding success, ovarian cyclicity, and cub survival in zoo-managed tigers (Panthera tigris)
Abstract
Understanding factors that influence reproduction and offspring survival in zoo populations is critical for management of threatened and endangered species. Examination of long-term data (1989-2011) compiled from the Association of Zoos and Aquarium's zoo-managed tiger breeding program provides the basis for a more thorough understanding of reproduction and scientifically based decisions for effective population management in this endangered felid. Biological and management-related factors that could influence tiger breeding success and cub survival were evaluated using logistic mixed models. Breeding success improved with female age until approximately age five, then declined thereafter. Experienced female breeders had greater breeding success than inexperienced females. Litter size was most predictive of cub survival, with average-sized litters (3-4 cubs) experiencing the highest proportional survival. Management-related factors, such as whether the breeding institution had a recent tiger litter and whether both animals were already located at the same institution, also influenced breeding success and cub survival. These results highlight the importance of institutional husbandry experience and the need to retain knowledge through staff turnovers to achieve optimal reproductive success. Using fecal estrogen data, frequency of ovarian cyclicity and mean cycle length did not differ by female age or parity; thus, lack of cyclicity and/or increased cycle duration are not likely explanations for declining breeding success with age. These results provide valuable reproductive information that should improve scientific management of zoo-based tiger populations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Husbandry practices and management influence breeding success.
“Equipped with the knowledge that husbandry practices and management influence breeding success [72,73], promoting good wellbeing in all animals involved in conservation breeding programs is a priority to fulfil the shared goals of optimal animal wellbeing and conservation success.”
From The Concept of Agency, Animal Wellbeing, and the Practical Realities of Ex Situ Breeding Programs in Zoos and Aquariums (2024) · cites this paper as [72]
Cites
Moreira, N., Brown, J. L., Moraes, W., Swanson, W. F., & Monteiro‐Filho, E. L. A. (2007) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.20139 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advances in Applied Zoo Animal Welfare Science
Ward, S. J., Sherwen, S., & Clark, F. E. (2018) · Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science · doi:10.1080/10888705.2018.1513842 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Norman, M., & Brando, S. (2024) · Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens · doi:10.3390/jzbg5040038 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Equipped with the knowledge that husbandry practices and management influence breeding success [72,73], promoting good wellbeing in all animals involved in conservation breeding programs is a priority to fulfil the shared goals of optimal animal wellbeing and conservation success.”
Øgelund Nielsen, R., Mastromonaco, G., Roy, S., Schad Eebes, K., Fienieg, E., Sliwa, A., Müller, P., Roe, S., Dorsey, C., Fazio, J., et al. (2026) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2026.111773 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Saunders, S. P., Harris, T., Traylor-Holzer, K., & Beck, K. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Minnesota Zoo (US)
- Corresponding author
- Saunders, Sarah P.
- ORCID
- Saunders, Sarah P.
- Venue
- Animal Reproduction Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 38-47
- ISSN
- 0378-4320 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001712807
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Animal Reproduction Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Riverbanks Zoo and Garden
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- tiger, captive breeding, breeding success, cub survival, ovarian cyclicity, fecal estrogen, maternal age, litter size, parity, endangered species management
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Animals, Animals, Zoo, Breeding, Conservation of Natural Resources, Feces, Female, Litter Size, Male, Menstrual Cycle, Pregnancy, Reproduction, Survival, Logistic Models, Gonadal Hormones, Tigers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review