The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Binge flying
Abstract
Recent popular press suggests that ‘binge flying’ constitutes a new site of behavioural addiction. We theoretically appraise and empirically support this proposition through interviews with consumers in Norway and the United Kingdom conducted in 2009. Consistent findings from across two national contexts evidence a growing negative discourse towards frequent short-haul tourist air travel and illustrate strategies of guilt suppression and denial used to span a cognitive dissonance between the short-term personal benefits of tourism and the air travel’s associated long-term consequences for climate change. Tensions between tourism consumption and changing social norms towards acceptable flying practice exemplify how this social group is beginning to (re)frame what constitutes ‘excessive’ holiday flying, despite concomitantly continuing their own frequent air travels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
International tourism and climate change
Scott, D., Gössling, S., & Hall, C. M. (2012) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.165 · Cited by 444
Climate change and tourism: a scientometric analysis using CiteSpace
Fang, Y., Yin, J., & Wu, B. (2018) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2017.1329310 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, S. A., Higham, J. E. S., & Cavaliere, C. T.
- Venue
- Annals of Tourism Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1070-1089
- ISSN
- 0160-7383 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105381553
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Binge flying. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.annals.2011.01.013
- The paper
- Cohen, S. A., Higham, J. E. S., & Cavaliere, C. T. (2011). Binge flying. Annals of Tourism Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.01.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
