Cited by 123Airway Management and Intubation TechniquesTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesRestraint-Related Deaths

Manual in-line stabilization for acute airway management of suspected cervical spine injury: historical review and current questions

Manoach, Seth, Paladino, Lorenzo·2007·Annals of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Direct laryngoscopy with manual in-line stabilization is standard of care for acute trauma patients with suspected cervical spine injury. Ethical and methodologic constraints preclude controlled trials of manual in-line stabilization, and recent work questions its effectiveness. We searched MEDLINE, Index Medicus, Web of Knowledge, the Cochrane Database, and article reference lists. According to this search, we present an ancestral review tracing the origins of manual in-line stabilization and an analysis of subsequent studies evaluating the risks and benefits of the procedure. All manual in-line stabilization data came from trials of uninjured patients, cadaveric models, and case series. The procedure was adopted because of reasonable inference from the benefits of stabilization during general care of spine-injured patients, weak empirical data, and expert opinion. More recent data indicate that direct laryngoscopy and intubation are unlikely to cause clinically significant movement and that manual in-line stabilization may not immobilize injured segments. In addition, manual in-line stabilization degrades laryngoscopic view, which may cause hypoxia and worsen outcomes in traumatic brain injury. Patients intubated in the emergency department with suspected cervical spine injury often have traumatic brain injury, but the incidence of unstable cervical lesions in this group is low. The limited available evidence suggests that allowing some flexion or extension of the head is u…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.01.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The primary benefit of a rigid cervical collar is to serve as a reminder about the potential existence of an unstable c-spine injury.

    “the primary benefit of a rigid cervical collar is to serve as a reminder about the potential existence of an unstable c-spine injury.”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [33]

  • Even in patients with known cervical spine injuries, secondary neurologic deterioration is rare, with a reported incidence of 0.03%.

    “even in patients with known cervical spine injuries, secondary neurologic deterioration is rare, with a reported incidence of 0.03%.33,[37][38][39]”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [33]

  • The incidence of c-spine injuries is 6%-8% in patients with head and facial trauma.

    “and 6%-8% in patients with head and facial trauma)”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [33]

  • The incidence of c-spine injuries is approximately 2% in the general trauma population.

    “the incidence of c-spine injuries is relatively low (occurring in approximately 2% in the general trauma population”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [33]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manoach, S., & Paladino, L.
Affiliations
State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Manoach, Seth
Venue
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
236-245
ISSN
0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074705029
Cited by
123
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Restraint-Related Deaths
Keywords
manual in-line stabilization, cervical spine injury, direct laryngoscopy, intubation, traumatic brain injury, head immobilization, supraglottic airway devices, video laryngoscopy, emergency department intubation
MeSH terms
Cervical Vertebrae, Emergencies, Humans, Intubation, Intratracheal, Laryngoscopy, Spinal Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review