Forcing Functions: The Need for Restraint
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some clinical decision support rules force clinicians to stop and respond, interrupting their work and substituting the designer's judgment for that of the clinician.
“some clinical decision support (CDS) rules force clinicians to stop and respond to the CDS, interrupting their work, substituting the designer ' s judgment for that of the clinician. 71”
From Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities (2010) · cites this paper as [71]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- Bisantz, A. M., & Wears, R. L.
- Affiliations
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wears, Robert L.
- Venue
- Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 477-479
- ISSN
- 0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126342869
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- patient restraint, forcing functions, computerized physician order entry, health information technology implementation, emergency department
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Data Collection, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Restraint, Physical, Time and Motion Studies, Reminder Systems, Efficiency, Organizational, Medical Order Entry Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review