Cited by 200Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesAirway Management and Intubation Techniques

The effect of ketamine on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure and health outcomes: a systematic review

Cohen, Lindsay, Athaide, Valerie, Wickham, Maeve E., Doyle-Waters, Mary M., Rose, Nicholas G.W., Hohl, Corinne M.·2015·Annals of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Study objective We synthesize the available evidence on the effect of ketamine on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures, neurologic outcomes, ICU length of stay, and mortality. Methods We developed a systematic search strategy and applied it to 6 electronic reference databases. We completed a gray literature search and searched medical journals as well as the bibliographies of relevant articles. We included randomized and nonrandomized prospective studies that compared the effect of ketamine with another intravenous sedative in intubated patients and reported at least 1 outcome of interest. Two authors independently performed title, abstract, and full-text reviews, and abstracted data from all studies, using standardized forms. Data from randomized controlled trials and prospective studies were synthesized in a qualitative manner because the study designs, patient populations, reported outcomes, and follow-up periods were heterogeneous. We used the Jadad score and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to assess study quality. Results We retrieved 4,896 titles, of which 10 studies met our inclusion criteria, reporting data on 953 patients. One study was deemed at low risk of bias in all quality assessment domains. All others were at high risk in at least 1 domain. Two of 8 studies reported small reductions in intracranial pressure within 10 minutes of ketamine administration, and 2 studies reported an increase. None of the studies reported significant differences in cerebral perf…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.06.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerns that ketamine may raise intracranial pressure and worsen outcomes in TBI is not supported by evidence.

    “Concerns that ketamine may raise intracranial pressure and worsen outcomes in TBI is not supported by evidence.61,62”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [61]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, L., Athaide, V., Wickham, M. E., Doyle-Waters, M. M., Rose, N. G. W., & Hohl, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Vancouver General Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Hohl, Corinne M.
Venue
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
43-51.e2
ISSN
0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014682794
Cited by
200
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Keywords
ketamine, intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, neurological outcome, mortality, ICU length of stay, intubated patients, intravenous sedation, critically ill patients, risk of bias
MeSH terms
Contraindications, Anesthetics, Dissociative, Critical Care, Humans, Intracranial Pressure, Ketamine, Treatment Outcome, Intracranial Hypertension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review