The effect of ketamine on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure and health outcomes: a systematic review
Abstract
Study objective We synthesize the available evidence on the effect of ketamine on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures, neurologic outcomes, ICU length of stay, and mortality. Methods We developed a systematic search strategy and applied it to 6 electronic reference databases. We completed a gray literature search and searched medical journals as well as the bibliographies of relevant articles. We included randomized and nonrandomized prospective studies that compared the effect of ketamine with another intravenous sedative in intubated patients and reported at least 1 outcome of interest. Two authors independently performed title, abstract, and full-text reviews, and abstracted data from all studies, using standardized forms. Data from randomized controlled trials and prospective studies were synthesized in a qualitative manner because the study designs, patient populations, reported outcomes, and follow-up periods were heterogeneous. We used the Jadad score and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to assess study quality. Results We retrieved 4,896 titles, of which 10 studies met our inclusion criteria, reporting data on 953 patients. One study was deemed at low risk of bias in all quality assessment domains. All others were at high risk in at least 1 domain. Two of 8 studies reported small reductions in intracranial pressure within 10 minutes of ketamine administration, and 2 studies reported an increase. None of the studies reported significant differences in cerebral perf…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Concerns that ketamine may raise intracranial pressure and worsen outcomes in TBI is not supported by evidence.
“Concerns that ketamine may raise intracranial pressure and worsen outcomes in TBI is not supported by evidence.61,62”
From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [61]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kovacs, G., & Sowers, N. (2018) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.006 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Sedation and analgesia for procedures in the pediatric emergency room
Ramalho, C. E., Bretas, P. M. C., Schvartsman, C., & Reis, A. G. (2017) · Jornal de Pediatria · doi:10.1016/j.jped.2017.07.009 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cohen, L., Athaide, V., Wickham, M. E., Doyle-Waters, M. M., Rose, N. G. W., & Hohl, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Vancouver General Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Hohl, Corinne M.
- Venue
- Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-51.e2
- ISSN
- 0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014682794
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
- Keywords
- ketamine, intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, neurological outcome, mortality, ICU length of stay, intubated patients, intravenous sedation, critically ill patients, risk of bias
- MeSH terms
- Contraindications, Anesthetics, Dissociative, Critical Care, Humans, Intracranial Pressure, Ketamine, Treatment Outcome, Intracranial Hypertension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review