Flush rate oxygen for emergency airway preoxygenation
Abstract
Study objective Recent data suggest that emergency airway preoxygenation with a bag-valve-mask (BVM) device (held with a tight mask seal but without squeezing the bag) is superior to a nonrebreather (NRB) mask at standard oxygen flow rates. We seek to determine whether preoxygenation with an NRB mask with flush rate oxygen (>40 L/min by fully opening a standard oxygen flowmeter) is noninferior to BVM device with standard-flow oxygen (15 L/min). We also seek to compare the efficacy of preoxygenation with NRB mask at flush rate oxygen with both NRB mask with oxygen at 15 L/min and simple mask at flush rate oxygen. Methods We performed a crossover trial using healthy volunteers. In random sequence, subjects underwent 3-minute trials of preoxygenation with nonrebreather mask with oxygen at 15 L/min (NRB-15), nonrebreather mask with flush rate oxygen (NRB-Flush), BVM device with oxygen at 15 L/min (BVM-15), and simple mask with flush rate oxygen. The primary outcome measure was the FeO 2 in a single exhaled breath. We compared the FeO 2 of NRB-Flush to other study groups, using a prespecified noninferiority margin of 10%. Results We enrolled 26 subjects. Mean FeO 2 values for NRB-15, NRB-Flush, BVM-15, and simple mask with flush rate oxygen were 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 50% to 57%), 86% (95% CI 84% to 88%), 77% (95% CI 74% to 81%), and 72% (95% CI 69% to 76%), respectively. FeO 2 for NRB-Flush was noninferior to BVM-15 (difference 8%; 95% CI 5% to 11%). FeO 2 for NRB-Flus…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Delivery of close to 100% oxygen for approximately 4 minutes is required to denitrogenate normal lungs.
“Delivery of close to 100% oxygen for approximately 4 minutes is required to denitrogenate normal lungs and may be most easily accomplished with high-flow, “flush-rate” (40 LPM) oxygen using a conventional non-rebreather mask.105”
From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [105]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kovacs, G., & Sowers, N. (2018) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.006 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
- Authors
- Driver, B. E., Prekker, M. E., Kornas, R. L., Cales, E. K., & Reardon, R. F.
- Affiliations
- Hennepin County Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Driver, Brian E.
- Venue
- Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2509255468
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Keywords
- emergency airway management, bag-valve-mask, oxygen flow rate, non-inferiority, crossover trial
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Emergency Medical Services, Female, Humans, Male, Oxygen, Laryngeal Masks, Airway Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review