Cited by 20Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

45MO Sotorasib in Combination with Panitumumab in Refractory KRAS G12C-Mutated Colorectal Cancer: Safety and Efficacy for Phase Ib Full Expansion Cohort

Open access
Kuboki, Y., Yaeger, R., Fakih, M., Strickler, J.H., Masuishi, T., Kim, E.J-H., Bestvina, C.M., Langer, C.J. +6 more·2022·Annals of Oncology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.077

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a recent phase 1b study, sotorasib plus panitumumab produced a confirmed response of 30% in pretreated KRAS G12C colorectal cancer patients, compared with 10% for sotorasib monotherapy.

    “Early clinical data support this hypothesis, and in a recent phase 1b study of sotorasib in combination with the EGFR-targeting monoclonal antibody panitumumab, a confirmed response of 30% was reported in pretreated patients who had colorectal cancer with a KRAS G12C mutation,32 as compared with 10% for sotorasib monotherapy.30”
  • In pretreated colorectal cancer patients with KRASG12C mutation, sotorasib plus panitumumab achieved an objective response rate of 30% compared to 10% for sotorasib monotherapy.

    “In a recent phase Ib study involving sotorasib in combination with the EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibody panitumumab, an objective response rate of 30% was reported in pretreated patients with colorectal cancer harboring a KRASG12C mutation, compared to 10% for sotorasib monotherapy [22,34].”
  • Combining an EGFR-directed antibody with a KRASG12C inhibitor is a clinically effective strategy to mitigate EGFR reactivation.

    “The combination of an EGFR-directed antibody with a KRASG12C inhibitor is a clinically effective strategy to mitigate EGFR reactivation (Table 2).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuboki, Y., Yaeger, R., Fakih, M., Strickler, J. H., Masuishi, T., Kim, E. J.-H., Bestvina, C. M., Langer, C. J., Krauss, J. C., Puri, S., Cardona, P., Chang, E. K., Tran, Q., & Hong, D. S.
Affiliations
  • National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Aichi Cancer Center (JP)
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
33
Pages
S1445-S1446
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4310753291
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Amgen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
sotorasib, panitumumab, KRAS G12C mutation, metastatic colorectal cancer, KRAS inhibitors, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, combination therapy, refractory disease, treatment efficacy and safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review