Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ESGO–ESMO–ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease

Open access
Ledermann, J.A., Matias-Guiu, X., Amant, F., Concin, N., Davidson, B., Fotopoulou, C., González-Martin, A., Gourley, C., Leary, A., Lorusso, D., Banerjee, S., Chiva, L., Cibula, D., Colombo, N., Croce, S., Eriksson, A.G., Falandry, C., Fischerova, D., Harter, P., Joly, F., Lazaro, C., Lok, C., Mahner, S., Marmé, F., Marth, C., McCluggage, W.G., McNeish, I.A., Morice, P., Nicum, S., Oaknin, A., Pérez-Fidalgo, J.A., Pignata, S., Ramirez, P.T., Ray-Coquard, I., Romero, I., Scambia, G., Sehouli, J., Shapira-Frommer, R., Sundar, S., Tan, D.S.P., Taskiran, C., van Driel, W.J., Vergote, I., Planchamp, F., Sessa, C., Fagotti, A.·2024·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society of Pathology held a consensus conference (CC) on ovarian cancer on 15-16 June 2022 in Valencia, Spain. The CC panel included 44 experts in the management of ovarian cancer and pathology, an ESMO scientific advisor and a methodologist. The aim was to discuss new or contentious topics and develop recommendations to improve and harmonise the management of patients with ovarian cancer. Eighteen questions were identified for discussion under four main topics: (i) pathology and molecular biology, (ii) early-stage disease and pelvic mass in pregnancy, (iii) advanced stage (including older/frail patients) and (iv) recurrent disease. The panel was divided into four working groups (WGs) to each address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above, based on their expertise. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript focuses on the recommendation statements that reached a consensus, their voting results and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.015

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 85 references

Cited by

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
Ledermann, J. A., Matias-Guiu, X., Amant, F., Concin, N., Davidson, B., Fotopoulou, C., González-Martin, A., Gourley, C., Leary, A., Lorusso, D., Banerjee, S., Chiva, L., Cibula, D., Colombo, N., Croce, S., Eriksson, A. G., Falandry, C., Fischerova, D., Harter, P., Joly, F., Lazaro, C., Lok, C., Mahner, S., Marmé, F., Marth, C., McCluggage, W. G., McNeish, I. A., Morice, P., Nicum, S., Oaknin, A., Pérez-Fidalgo, J. A., Pignata, S., Ramirez, P. T., Ray-Coquard, I., Romero, I., Scambia, G., Sehouli, J., Shapira-Frommer, R., Sundar, S., Tan, D. S. P., Taskiran, C., van Driel, W. J., Vergote, I., Planchamp, F., Sessa, C., & Fagotti, A.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
248-266
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391447886
Cited by
333
References
85
FWCI
107.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ESGO–ESMO–ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.015
The paper
Ledermann, J. A., Matias-Guiu, X., Amant, F., Concin, N., Davidson, B., Fotopoulou, C., González-Martin, A., Gourley, C., Leary, A., Lorusso, D., Banerjee, S., Chiva, L., Cibula, D., Colombo, N., Croce, S., Eriksson, A. G., Falandry, C., Fischerova, D., Harter, P., . . . Fagotti, A. (2024). ESGO–ESMO–ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease. Annals of Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.