Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,263

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Niraparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Open access
González-Martín, Antonio, Pothuri, Bhavana, Vergote, Ignace, DePont Christensen, René, Graybill, Whitney, Mirza, Mansoor R., McCormick, Colleen, Lorusso, Domenica, Hoskins, Paul, Freyer, Gilles, Baumann, Klaus, Jardon, Kris, Redondo, Andrés, Moore, Richard G., Vulsteke, Christof, O’Cearbhaill, Roisin E., Lund, Bente, Backes, Floor, Barretina-Ginesta, Pilar, Haggerty, Ashley F., Rubio-Pérez, Maria J., Shahin, Mark S., Mangili, Giorgia, Bradley, William H., Bruchim, Ilan, Sun, Kaiming, Malinowska, Izabela A., Li, Yong, Gupta, Divya, Monk, Bradley J.·2019·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: mutations. The efficacy of niraparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer after a response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy is unknown. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in a 2:1 ratio to receive niraparib or placebo once daily after a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival in patients who had tumors with homologous-recombination deficiency and in those in the overall population, as determined on hierarchical testing. A prespecified interim analysis for overall survival was conducted at the time of the primary analysis of progression-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 733 patients who underwent randomization, 373 (50.9%) had tumors with homologous-recombination deficiency. Among the patients in this category, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the niraparib group than in the placebo group (21.9 months vs. 10.4 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.59; P<0.001). In the overall population, the corresponding progression-free survival was 13.8 months and 8.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.76; P<0.001). At the 24-month interim analysis, the rate of overall survival was 84% in the niraparib group and 77% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.11). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were anemia (in 31.0% of the patients), thrombocytopenia (in 28.7%), and neutropenia (in 12.8%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who had a response to platinum-based chemotherapy, those who received niraparib had significantly longer progression-free survival than those who received placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of homologous-recombination deficiency. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02655016.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1910962

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 2,263

Metadata

Authors
González-Martín, A., Pothuri, B., Vergote, I., DePont Christensen, R., Graybill, W., Mirza, M. R., McCormick, C., Lorusso, D., Hoskins, P., Freyer, G., Baumann, K., Jardon, K., Redondo, A., Moore, R. G., Vulsteke, C., O’Cearbhaill, R. E., Lund, B., Backes, F., Barretina-Ginesta, P., Haggerty, A. F., Rubio-Pérez, M. J., Shahin, M. S., Mangili, G., Bradley, W. H., Bruchim, I., Sun, K., Malinowska, I. A., Li, Y., Gupta, D., & Monk, B. J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2019-12-19
Volume
381
Issue
25
Pages
2391-2402
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2975141952
Cited by
2,263
References
2
FWCI
89.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Niraparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1910962
The paper
González-Martín, A., Pothuri, B., Vergote, I., DePont Christensen, R., Graybill, W., Mirza, M. R., McCormick, C., Lorusso, D., Hoskins, P., Freyer, G., Baumann, K., Jardon, K., Redondo, A., Moore, R. G., Vulsteke, C., O’Cearbhaill, R. E., Lund, B., Backes, F., Barretina-Ginesta, P., . . . Monk, B. J. (2019). Niraparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1910962

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.