The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Niraparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: mutations. The efficacy of niraparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer after a response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy is unknown. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in a 2:1 ratio to receive niraparib or placebo once daily after a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival in patients who had tumors with homologous-recombination deficiency and in those in the overall population, as determined on hierarchical testing. A prespecified interim analysis for overall survival was conducted at the time of the primary analysis of progression-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 733 patients who underwent randomization, 373 (50.9%) had tumors with homologous-recombination deficiency. Among the patients in this category, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the niraparib group than in the placebo group (21.9 months vs. 10.4 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.59; P<0.001). In the overall population, the corresponding progression-free survival was 13.8 months and 8.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.76; P<0.001). At the 24-month interim analysis, the rate of overall survival was 84% in the niraparib group and 77% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.11). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were anemia (in 31.0% of the patients), thrombocytopenia (in 28.7%), and neutropenia (in 12.8%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who had a response to platinum-based chemotherapy, those who received niraparib had significantly longer progression-free survival than those who received placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of homologous-recombination deficiency. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02655016.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M., Kind, P., Parkin, D., Bonsel, G., & Badia, X. (2011) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x · Cited by 9,795
Cited by
Targeting DNA damage response pathways in cancer
Groelly, F. J., Fawkes, M., Dagg, R. A., Blackford, A. N., & Tarsounas, M. (2023) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-022-00535-5 · Cited by 836
DiSilvestro, P., Banerjee, S., Colombo, N., Scambia, G., Kim, B.-G., Oaknin, A., Friedlander, M., Lisyanskaya, A., Floquet, A., Leary, A., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.22.01549 · Cited by 511
Self-citationClinical and translational advances in ovarian cancer therapy
Konstantinopoulos, P. A., & Matulonis, U. A. (2023) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-023-00617-9 · Cited by 394
Germline and Somatic Tumor Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline
Konstantinopoulos, P. A., Norquist, B., Lacchetti, C., Armstrong, D., Grisham, R. N., Goodfellow, P. J., Kohn, E. C., Levine, D. A., Liu, J. F., Lu, K. H., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.02960 · Cited by 381
Ledermann, J. A., Matias-Guiu, X., Amant, F., Concin, N., Davidson, B., Fotopoulou, C., González-Martin, A., Gourley, C., Leary, A., Lorusso, D., et al. (2024) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.015 · Cited by 333
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- González-Martín, A., Pothuri, B., Vergote, I., DePont Christensen, R., Graybill, W., Mirza, M. R., McCormick, C., Lorusso, D., Hoskins, P., Freyer, G., Baumann, K., Jardon, K., Redondo, A., Moore, R. G., Vulsteke, C., O’Cearbhaill, R. E., Lund, B., Backes, F., Barretina-Ginesta, P., Haggerty, A. F., Rubio-Pérez, M. J., Shahin, M. S., Mangili, G., Bradley, W. H., Bruchim, I., Sun, K., Malinowska, I. A., Li, Y., Gupta, D., & Monk, B. J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2019-12-19
- Volume
- 381
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 2391-2402
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2975141952
- Cited by
- 2,263
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 89.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Niraparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1910962
- The paper
- González-Martín, A., Pothuri, B., Vergote, I., DePont Christensen, R., Graybill, W., Mirza, M. R., McCormick, C., Lorusso, D., Hoskins, P., Freyer, G., Baumann, K., Jardon, K., Redondo, A., Moore, R. G., Vulsteke, C., O’Cearbhaill, R. E., Lund, B., Backes, F., Barretina-Ginesta, P., . . . Monk, B. J. (2019). Niraparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1910962
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.