Cited by 39Skin Protection and Agingmelanin and skin pigmentationOcular and Laser Science Research

Effects of solar radiation and an update on photoprotection

Open access
Garnacho Saucedo, Gloria M., Salido Vallejo, Rafael, Moreno Giménez, Jose Carlos·2020·Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)

Abstract

Sunburn, immunodepression, photoaging, and photocarcinogenesis, are some of the most significant adverse effects of solar radiation in humans. Children are a population group of special vulnerability, due to the fact that exposure to the sun has more pronounced biological effects compared to adults. Furthermore, childhood is a critical period for promoting the development of photo damage and photocarcinogenesis in the later stages of life if adequate measures are not put into place. This is because it is estimated that between 18 and 20 years of age 40–50% of the accumulative exposure to ultraviolet radiation up to 60 years of age is received. The most important strategy for the photoprotection of children is changes in behaviour and habits associated with exposure to the sun at all levels (school, society, family, etc.). Resorting to the shade, reduction in overall time of exposure to the sun, and physical protection (clothes, hats, and sunglasses) are the best and least costly photoprotection strategies. The photoprotectors must be incorporated into the daily routine of children in the same way as adults, and must complete a series of requirements in order to make them effective, safe, and in line with the environment. Las quemaduras solares, la inmunodepresión, el fotoenvejecimiento y la fotocarcinogénesis son algunos de los efectos adversos más importantes de la radiación solar en el ser humano. Los niños son un grupo poblacional de especial vulnerabilidad debido a que en ellos la exposición solar tiene efectos biológicos más pronunciados en comparación con los adultos. Por otro lado, la infancia es un periodo crítico para promover el desarrollo de fotodaño y fotocarcinogénesis en etapas más tardías de la vida si no se ponen las medidas adecuadas, ya que se estima que entre los 18 y 20 años de edad se recibe del 40-50% de la exposición acumulativa a la radiación ultravioleta hasta la edad de 60 años. La estrategia más importante para la fotoprotección de los niños son las modificaciones de comportamiento y hábitos relacionados con la exposición al sol a todos los niveles (colegio, sociedad, familia, etc.). El recurso de la sombra, la reducción del tiempo global de exposición al sol y la protección física (ropa, sombreros y gafas de sol) representan las mejores y menos costosas estrategias de fotoprotección. Los fotoprotectores deben incorporarse a la rutina diaria de los niños, de la misma manera que los adultos, y deben cumplir una serie de requisitos que los hagan eficaces, seguros y comprometidos con el medio ambiente.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anpede.2020.04.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physical ultraviolet filters and chemical ultraviolet filters are useful but do not offer comprehensive protection.

    “Physical ultraviolet filters, such as sunglasses and sun clothing, and chemical ultraviolet filters, such as sunscreen lotions, are both useful, but they do not offer comprehensive protection”

    From Skin protection from solar ultraviolet radiation using natural compounds: a review (2024) · cites this paper as Garnacho Saucedo et al. 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Blume-Peytavi U, Bagot M, Tennstedt D, Saint Aroman M, Stock- fleth E, Zlotogorski A, et al. Dermatology today and tomorrow: from symptom control to targeted therapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33:3---36, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15335. · DOI
  2. Narla S, Kohli I, Hamzavi IH, Lim HW. Visible light in photodermatology. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2020;19:99---104, http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9pp00425d. · DOI
  3. Turner J, Igoe D, Parisi AV, McGonigle AJ, Amar A, Wainwright L. A review on the ability of smartphones to detect ultraviolet (UV) radiation and their potential to be used in UV research and for public education purposes. Sci Total Environ. 2020;706:135873, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135873. · DOI
  4. Balk SJ, Council on Environmental Health and Section on Dermatology, American Academy of Pediatrics. Tech- nical report: Ultraviolet radiation: a hazard to children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2011;127:588---97, http://dx. doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3501. · DOI
  5. Stamatas GN, Nikolovski J, Luedtke MA, Kollias N, Wie- gand BC. Infant skin microstructure assessed in vivo dif- fers from adult skin in organization and at the cel- lular level. Pediatr Dermatol. 2010;27:125---31, http://dx. doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1470.2009.00973.x. · DOI
  6. Dowd MD. Treatment and prevention of pediatric sun- burn. Pediatr Ann. 2019;48:e213---4, http://dx.doi. org/10.3928/19382359-20190520-02. · DOI
  7. Dennis LK, Vanbeek MJ, Beane Freeman LE, Smith BJ, Dawson DV, Coughlin JA. Sunburns and risk of cutaneous melanoma: does age matter? A comprehensive meta- analysis. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18:614---27, http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.04.006. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Khlat M, Vail A, Parkin M, Green A. Mortality from melanoma in migrants to Australia: variation by age at arrival and duration of stay. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135:1103---13, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116210. · DOI
  9. Zhang M, Qureshi AA, Geller AC, Frazier L, Hunter DJ, Han J. Use of tanning beds and incidence of skin can- cer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1588---93, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.3652. · DOI
  10. Seité S, Fourtanier A, Moyal D, Young AR. Photodam- age to human skin by suberythemal exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation can be attenuated by sunscreens: a review. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163:903---14, http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10018.x. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Green AC, Wallingford SC, McBride P. Childhood exposure to ultraviolet radiation and harmful skin effects: epidemi- ological evidence. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011;107:349---55, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.08.010. · DOI
  12. Moreno S, Soria X, Martínez M, Martí RM, Casanova JM. Epidemiology of melanocytic naevi in children from Lleida, Catalonia, Spain: protective role of sunscreen in the develop- ment of acquired moles. Acta Derm Venereol. 2016;96:479---84, http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-2277. · DOI
  13. Ghazi S, Couteau C, Paparis E, Coiffard LJ. Interest of external photoprotection by means of clothing and sunscreen products in young children. J Eur Acad Der- matol Venereol. 2012;26:1026---30, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04139.x. · DOI
  14. Li H, Colantonio S, Dawson A, Lin X, Beecker J. Sun- screen application safety, and sun protection: the evi- dence. J Cutan Med Surg. 2019;23:357---69, http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1203475419856611. · DOI
  15. Bielinski K, Bielinski N. UV Radiation transmittance: regular clothing versus sun-protective clothing. Cutis. 2014;94:135---8.
  16. Monteiro-Riviere NA, Wiench K, Landsiedel R, Schulte S, Inman AO, Riviere JE. Safety evaluation of sunscreen formulations containing titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in UVB sunburned skin: an in vitro and in vivo study. Toxicol Sci. 2011;123:264---80, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfr148. · DOI
  17. Bernstein EF, Sarkas HW, Boland P, Bouche D. Beyond sun protection factor: an approach to environmental protection with novel mineral coatings in a vehicle containing a blend of skincare ingredients. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19:407---15, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13007. · DOI
  18. Schneider SL, Lim HW. Review of environmental effects of oxybenzone and other sunscreen active ingredi- ents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:266---71, http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.033. · DOI
  19. Warshaw EM, Wang MZ, Maibach HI, Belsito DV, Zug KA, Taylor JS, et al. Patch test reactions associated with sunscreen products and the importance of testing to an expanded series: retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001 to 2010. Der- matitis. 2013;24:176---82, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1097/DER.0b013e3182983845. · DOI
  20. Julian E, Palestro AM, Thomas JA. Pediatric sunscreen and sun safety guidelines. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015;54:1133---40, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0009922815591889. · DOI
  21. Kabir Y, Seidel R, McKnight B, Moy R. DNA repair enzymes: an important role in skin cancer prevention and reversal of photodamage ---a review of the literature. J Drugs Dermatol. 2015;14:297---303.
  22. Lim HW, Arellano-Mendoza MI, Stengel F. Current challenges in photoprotection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:S91---9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2016.09.040. · DOI
  23. Langendonk JG, Balwani M, Anderson KE, Bonkovsky HL, Anstey AV, BissellF D.M., et al. Afamelanotide for ery- thropoietic protoporphyria. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:48---59, http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411481. · DOI
  24. Andreola GM, Carvalho VO, Huczok J, Cat MNL, Abagge KT. Photoprotection in adolescents: what they know and how they behave. An Bras Dermatol. 2018;93:39---44, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20185489. · DOI
  25. Reinau D, Meier C, Gerber N, Hofbauer GF, Surber C. Sun pro- tective behaviour of primary and secondary school students in North-Western Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012;142:w13520, http://dx.doi.org/10.4414/smw.2012.13520. · DOI
  26. McLoone JK, Meiser B, Karatas J, Sousa MS, Zilliacus E, Kas- parian NA. Perceptions of melanoma risk among Australian adolescents: barriers to sun protection and recommendations for improvement. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014;38:321---5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12209. · DOI
  27. Klostermann S, Bolte G, GME Study Group. Determinants of inadequate parental sun protection behaviour in their children ---results of a cross-sectional study in Ger- many. Int Hyg Environ Health. 2014;217:363---9, http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.07.013. · DOI
  28. Diaz A, Neale RE, Kimlin MG, Jones L, Janda M. The chil- dren and sunscreen study: a crossover trial investigating children's sunscreen application thickness and the influence of age and dispenser type. Arch Dermatol. 2012;148:606---12, http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2011.2586. · DOI
  29. Gilaberte Calzada Y, Teruel Melero MP, Pardos Martínez C, Pueyo Ascaso A, Doste Larrull D, Coscojuela Santaliestra C, et al. Efec- tividad del programa educativo escolar «SolSano» para la pre- vención del cáncer de piel. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2002;93:313---9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-7310(02)76582-4. · DOI
  30. Pereira LA, Luz FB, Carneiro CMMO, Xavier ALR, Kanaan S, Miot HA. Evaluation of vitamin D plasma levels after mild exposure to the sun with photopro- tection. An Bras Dermatol. 2019;94:56---61, http://dx. doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20198070. · DOI
  31. Jindal AK, Gupta A, Vinay K, Bishnoi A. Sun exposure in chil- dren: balancing the benefits and harms. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2020;11:94---8, http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/idoj.IDOJ 206 19. · DOI
  32. Scott JF, Das LM, Ahsanuddin S, Qiu Y, Binko AM, Traylor ZP, et al. Oral vitamin D rapidly attenuates inflammation from sunburn: an interventional study. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:2078---86, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.04.040. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Park YM, White AJ, Jackson CL, Weinberg CR, Sandler DP. Association of exposure to artificial light at night while sleep- ing with risk of obesity in women. JAMA Internal Med. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0571. · DOI
  34. Arjmandi N, Mortazavi G, Zarei S, Faraz M, Mortazavi SAR. Can light emitted from smartphone screens and taking self- ies cause premature aging and wrinkles? J Biomed Phys Eng. 2018;8:447---52.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garnacho Saucedo, G. M., Salido Vallejo, R., & Moreno Giménez, J. C.
Venue
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
92
Issue
6
Pages
377.e1-377.e9
ISSN
2341-2879 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034350838
Cited by
39
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anales de Pediatría (English Edition) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular and Laser Science Research
Keywords
photoprotection, solar radiation, ultraviolet radiation, sunburn, immunodepression, photoaging, photocarcinogenesis, children, childhood sun exposure, sun protection behavior, photoprotective agents, sun protection education, skin cancer prevention, cumulative UV exposure, shade avoidance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review