Cited by 2,179SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro.

Open access
Caly, Leon, Druce, Julian D., Catton, Mike G., Jans, David A., Wagstaff, Kylie M.·2020·Antiviral Research

Abstract

Although several clinical trials are now underway to test possible therapies, the worldwide response to the COVID-19 outbreak has been largely limited to monitoring/containment. We report here that Ivermectin, an FDA-approved anti-parasitic previously shown to have broad-spectrum anti-viral activity in vitro, is an inhibitor of the causative virus (SARS-CoV-2), with a single addition to Vero-hSLAM cells 2 h post infection with SARS-CoV-2 able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in viral RNA at 48 h. Ivermectin therefore warrants further investigation for possible benefits in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104787

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ivermectin was shown to have antiviral effects against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro.

    “In June 2020, ivermectin, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved antiparasitic drug, was shown to have antiviral effects against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in vitro [1].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caly, L., Druce, J. D., Catton, M. G., Jans, D. A., & Wagstaff, K. M.
Affiliations
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Wagstaff, Kylie M.
Venue
Antiviral Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
178
Pages
104787
ISSN
0166-3542 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014962324
Cited by
2,179
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 183 · 2022: 392 · 2021: 692 · 2020: 715 · 2019: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
65.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antiviral Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Breast Cancer Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
ivermectin, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, antiviral activity, viral replication inhibition, antiparasitic drugs, antiviral drug repurposing
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Animals, Antiviral Agents, Australia, Chlorocebus aethiops, Humans, Ivermectin, Pneumonia, Viral, Vero Cells, Virus Replication, Drug Approval, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review