Protein enrichment of yam peels by fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (BY4743)
Open accessAbstract
Conventional sources of protein are becoming inadequate for protein-based food supply. Non-conventional sources are of much concern, but literature is sparse on the protein quality of yam peel biomass. Solid state fermentation (with and without ammonium sulphate) of yam peels was carried out for 96 h, using Saccharomyces cerevisiae (BY4743). Samples from fermented biomass were collected at 24 h interval for 96 h, oven dried at 60 °C, cooled, milled and assayed for chemical and amino acid composition. The crude protein, true protein, fat and ash contents increased significantly from 6.60%, 4.38%, 1.12% and 4.45% to 15.54%, 13.37%, 2.09% and 8.02% respectively when fermentation reached 96 h in the presence of ammonium sulphate. High protein content with good amino acids profile (leucine, valine, lysine and threonine as essential amino acids) was recorded in ammonium sulphate supplemented peels fermented for 96 h. Remarkable increase in protein and amino acids suggested that ammonium sulphate supplement influenced the biomass protein yield and quality.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Protein with essential amino acid content, such as threonine, lysine, valine, and leucine, was obtained after solid state fermentation of yam peel for 96 h by Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4743.
“Protein with essential amino acid content, such as threonine, lysine, valine, and leucine was obtained after solid state fermentation of yam peel for 96 h by Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4743 [115].”
From Food Waste Biorefinery: Pathway towards Circular Bioeconomy (2021) · cites this paper as [115]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 97
- Authors
- Aruna, T. E., Aworh, O. C., Raji, A. O., & Olagunju, A. I.
- Affiliations
- Kwara State University (NG)
- University of Ibadan (NG)
- Federal University of Technology (NG)
- Corresponding author
- Raji, Akeem O.
- Venue
- Annals of Agricultural Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-37
- ISSN
- 0570-1783 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2589273619
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 5.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Agricultural Science Cairo (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Advanced Scientific Research Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Keywords
- yam peel, protein enrichment, solid-state fermentation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, amino acid composition, protein yield, cassava by-products
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review