The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Topological order and conformal quantum critical points
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We discuss a certain class of two-dimensional quantum systems which exhibit conventional order and topological order, as well as quantum critical points separating these phases. All of the ground-state equal-time correlators of these theories are equal to correlation functions of a local two-dimensional classical model. The critical points therefore exhibit a time-independent form of conformal invariance. These theories characterize the universality classes of two-dimensional quantum dimer models and of quantum generalizations of the eight-vertex model, as well as Z 2 and non-abelian gauge theories. The conformal quantum critical points are relatives of the Lifshitz points of three-dimensional anisotropic classical systems such as smectic liquid crystals. In particular, the ground-state wave functional of these quantum Lifshitz points is just the statistical (Gibbs) weight of the ordinary two-dimensional free boson, the two-dimensional Gaussian model. The full phase diagram for the quantum eight-vertex model exhibits quantum critical lines with continuously varying critical exponents separating phases with long-range order from a Z 2 deconfined topologically ordered liquid phase. We show how similar ideas also apply to a well-known field theory with non-Abelian symmetry, the strong-coupling limit of 2+1-dimensional Yang–Mills gauge theory with a Chern–Simons term. The ground state of this theory is relevant for recent theories of topological quantum computation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial
Witten, E. (1989) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01217730 · Cited by 4,758
An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems
Kogut, J. B. (1979) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.51.659 · Cited by 2,029
Cited by
Entanglement in many-body systems
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., & Vedral, V. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.517 · Cited by 3,745
Quantum criticality beyond the Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm
Senthil, T., Balents, L., Sachdev, S., Vishwanath, A., & Fisher, M. P. A. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.144407 · Cited by 834
Membranes at quantum criticality
Hořava, P. (2009) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/03/020 · Cited by 731
Criticality, the Area Law, and the Computational Power of Projected Entangled Pair States
Verstraete, F., Wolf, M. M., Perez-Garcia, D., & Cirac, J. I. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.220601 · Cited by 580
Hastings, M. B., & Wen, X.-G. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.045141 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Ardonne, E., Fendley, P., & Fradkin, E.
- Venue
- Annals of Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 310
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 493-551
- ISSN
- 0003-4916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054766688
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topological order and conformal quantum critical points. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.aop.2004.01.004
- The paper
- Ardonne, E., Fendley, P., & Fradkin, E. (2004). Topological order and conformal quantum critical points. Annals of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2004.01.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.