The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice
Abstract
Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice Denise F. Polit, Cheryl Tatano Beck 7th edition 2011, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 624 pages, paperback
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2013) · Cited by 2,621
Cited by
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13031 · Cited by 4,295
Snowball Sampling: A Purposeful Method of Sampling in Qualitative Research
Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017) · Strides in Development of Medical Education · doi:10.5812/sdme.67670 · Cited by 2,275
Assarroudi, A., Heshmati Nabavi, F., Armat, M. R., Ebadi, A., & Vaismoradi, M. (2018) · Journal of Research in Nursing · doi:10.1177/1744987117741667 · Cited by 1,252
Butler, A., Hall, H., & Copnell, B. (2016) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/wvn.12134 · Cited by 539
Magaldi, D., & Berler, M. (2020) · Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_857 · Cited by 433
Metadata
- Authors
- Stannard, D.
- Venue
- AORN Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01-27
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 307-308
- ISSN
- 0001-2092 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-0369
- OpenAlex
- W2011709099
- Cited by
- 2,083
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 143.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.aorn.2011.10.009
- The paper
- Stannard, D. (2012). Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. AORN Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2011.10.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
