Cited by 30Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsInfant Development and Preterm CareBreastfeeding Practices and Influences

Implementing skin-to-skin contact for cesarean birth

Boyd, Margaret M.·2017·AORN Journal

Abstract

Early skin‐to‐skin (STS) contact in the OR facilitates the development of mothering behaviors, breastfeeding success, and newborn adaptation to extrauterine life. A team at my institution performed a quality improvement project to implement a standard of care for STS contact in the OR during and after cesarean birth. Thirty‐seven of 50 mother‐infant dyads experienced STS contact in the OR or in the postanesthesia care unit. Twenty‐five mothers and newborns who experienced STS contact did so on the OR bed. The median time newborns spent engaged in STS contact with their mothers was 42 minutes and 30 seconds. Developing and using a standard of care to implement this evidence‐based practice facilitated acceptance of this intervention. Obstacles that staff members encountered included maternal or neonatal instability, equipment problems, and nurse staffing issues. Staff members addressed these obstacles through creative problem‐solving.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aorn.2017.04.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Practical concerns that may complicate provision of skin-to-skin contact after cesarean birth include lack of a standardized protocol, nursing staff availability, maternal or neonatal instability, type of anesthetic, support from anesthesia, clinician education, and practice and behaviour changes in a busy clinical environment.

    “other practical concerns that may complicate the provision of skin-to-skin contact after cesarean birth include the lack of a standardized protocol,32 nursing staff availability,33 maternal or neonatal instability,34 type of anesthetic,35 support from anesthesia, 35 clinician education,32 and the challenge of practice and behaviour changes in a busy clinical environment.25”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boyd, M. M.
Corresponding author
Boyd, Margaret M.
Venue
AORN Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-27
Volume
105
Issue
6
Pages
579-592
ISSN
  • 0001-2092 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-0369
OpenAlex
W2617408898
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AORN Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Keywords
skin-to-skin contact, cesarean section, operating room, post-anesthesia care unit, standard of care, quality improvement, breastfeeding, newborn adaptation, mother-infant dyads, nurse staffing
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Breast Feeding, Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Behavior, Mother-Child Relations, Operating Rooms, Pregnancy, Touch, Perioperative Care, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Improvement, Kangaroo-Mother Care Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review