Implementing skin-to-skin contact for cesarean birth
Abstract
Early skin‐to‐skin (STS) contact in the OR facilitates the development of mothering behaviors, breastfeeding success, and newborn adaptation to extrauterine life. A team at my institution performed a quality improvement project to implement a standard of care for STS contact in the OR during and after cesarean birth. Thirty‐seven of 50 mother‐infant dyads experienced STS contact in the OR or in the postanesthesia care unit. Twenty‐five mothers and newborns who experienced STS contact did so on the OR bed. The median time newborns spent engaged in STS contact with their mothers was 42 minutes and 30 seconds. Developing and using a standard of care to implement this evidence‐based practice facilitated acceptance of this intervention. Obstacles that staff members encountered included maternal or neonatal instability, equipment problems, and nurse staffing issues. Staff members addressed these obstacles through creative problem‐solving.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Practical concerns that may complicate provision of skin-to-skin contact after cesarean birth include lack of a standardized protocol, nursing staff availability, maternal or neonatal instability, type of anesthetic, support from anesthesia, clinician education, and practice and behaviour changes in a busy clinical environment.
“other practical concerns that may complicate the provision of skin-to-skin contact after cesarean birth include the lack of a standardized protocol,32 nursing staff availability,33 maternal or neonatal instability,34 type of anesthetic,35 support from anesthesia, 35 clinician education,32 and the challenge of practice and behaviour changes in a busy clinical environment.25”
From Women’s experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mixed‐method study of women’s assessment and experience of childbirth care
Donate‐Manzanares, M., Rodríguez‐Cano, T., Rodríguez‐Almagro, J., Hernández‐Martínez, A., Santos‐Hernández, G., & Beato‐Fernández, L. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14984 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Machold, C. A., O’Rinn, S. E., McKellin, W. H., Ballantyne, G., & Barrett, J. F. R. (2021) · CMAJ Open · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20200079 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Boyd, M. M.
- Corresponding author
- Boyd, Margaret M.
- Venue
- AORN Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-05-27
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 579-592
- ISSN
- 0001-2092 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-0369
- OpenAlex
- W2617408898
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 3.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- AORN Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
- Keywords
- skin-to-skin contact, cesarean section, operating room, post-anesthesia care unit, standard of care, quality improvement, breastfeeding, newborn adaptation, mother-infant dyads, nurse staffing
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Breast Feeding, Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Behavior, Mother-Child Relations, Operating Rooms, Pregnancy, Touch, Perioperative Care, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Improvement, Kangaroo-Mother Care Method
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review