The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Linking Participative Budgeting Congruence to Organization Performance (Retracted)
Clinton, B. D., & Hunton, J. E. (2001) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.127 · Cited by 39
Retracted(1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15,085
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.
Babbie, E., & Dillman, D. A. (1982) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2068433 · Cited by 6,852
Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings
Shrout, P. E. (1980) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(80)90063-4 · Cited by 6,010
Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.
Osmond, M. W., & Dillman, D. A. (1979) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2577403 · Cited by 5,023
Losh-Hesselbart, S., & Fowler, F. J. (1985) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288598 · Cited by 4,764
Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
CHISNALL, P. M. (2007) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/s0021849907070237 · Cited by 3,435
Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context
(1990) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90054-w · Cited by 1,713
Cited by
Nitzl, C. (2016) · Journal of Accounting Literature · doi:10.1016/j.acclit.2016.09.003 · Cited by 580
Management control as a system or a package? Conceptual and empirical issues
Grabner, I., & Moers, F. (2013) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2013.09.002 · Cited by 486
Strategy, Choice of Performance Measures, and Performance
Stede, W. A. V. D., Chow, C. W., & Lin, T. W. (2006) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria.2006.18.1.185 · Cited by 321
A manipulationist view of causality in cross-sectional survey research
Van der Stede, W. A. (2014) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2013.12.001 · Cited by 95
Do Customer Acquisition Cost, Retention and Usage Matter to Firm Performance and Valuation?
Livne, G., Simpson, A., & Talmor, E. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1587765 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Van der Stede, W. A., Young, S. M., & Chen, C. X.
- Venue
- Accounting, Organizations and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 655-684
- ISSN
- 0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033712807
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 120
- FWCI
- 26.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.aos.2005.01.003
- The paper
- Van der Stede, W. A., Young, S. M., & Chen, C. X. (2005). Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.01.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
